Abstract
In spite of standardization and improvements in technique, colorectal surgery remains subject to an intraoperative accident rate that has undergone a slight increase with the advent of laparoscopy [1]. This fact can be correlated to the technical limitations of laparoscopic access, which are its two-dimensional imaging and the loss of tactile sensation [1]. The most updated studies report a global incidence of intraoperative accidents of 10-13% [2, 3]; for rectal surgery this incidence is significantly higher than for colonic surgery (13% vs. 7%) [3]. The most frequent intraoperative complications are hemorrhage, lesions to the bowel, spleen, urethra and bladder, as well as technical difficulties during anastomosis. The risk of technical difficulties during mini-invasive operations for colorectal cancer is higher for surgeons in the learning phase, a phase that is often longer for laparoscopy than for the same procedures carried out in laparotomy; the learning curve for laparoscopic rectal surgery seems to be about 35 operations [4–6]. In analyzing the learning curve of a junior surgeon, the most significant data are the complication rate, the length of the hospital stay and the incidence of re-hospitalization, and not the conversion rate and the length of the operation; indeed, if the operating time does not go down as the experience of the surgeon increases, this often reflects the fact that the more complex individual cases are generally performed by expert surgeons [7].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
D’Annibale A, Morpurgo E, Fiscon V et al (2004) Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum 47:2162–2168
Tarik S, Arman K, Sanket S et al (2011) Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Is Associated With a Higher Intraoperative Complication Rate Than Open Surgery. Ann Surg 253:35–43
Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al, for the MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopicassisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726
Jamali FR, Soweid AM, Dimassi H et al (2008) Evaluating the degree of difficulty of laparo-scopic colorectal surgery. Arch Surg 143:762–767
Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242:83–91
Li GX, Yan HT, Yu J et al (2006) Learning curve of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao 26:535–538
Kirchhoff P, Clavien PA, Hahnloser D (2010) Complications in colorectal surgery: risk factors and preventive strategies. Patient Safety in Surgery 4:5
Shawki S, Bashankaev B, Denoya P et al (2009) What is the definition of “conversion” in laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Surg Endosc 23:2321–2326
Thorpe H, Jayne DG, Guillou PJ et al (2008) Patient factors influencing conversion from laparoscopically assisted to open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 95:199–205
Chan ACY, Poon JTC, Fan JKM et al (2008) Impact of conversion on the long-term outcome in laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 22:2625–2630
Tan PY, Stephens JH, Rieger NA, Hewett PJ (2008) Laparoscopically assisted colectomy: a study of risk factors and predictors of open conversion. Surg Endosc 22:1708–1714
Li JCM, Lee JFY, Ng SSM et al (2010) Conversion in laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for right colon cancer: risk factors and clinical outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 25:983–988
Yang C, Wexner SD, Safar B et al (2009) Conversion in laparoscopic surgery: does intraoperative complication influence outcome? Surg Endosc 23:2454–2458
Chan ACY, Poon JTC, Fan JKM et al (2008) Impact of conversion on the long-term outcome in laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 22:2625–2630
Gonzalez R, Smith CD, Mason E et al (2006) Consequences of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 49:197–204
Ahmad G, Duffy JMN, Phillips K et al (2008) Laparoscopic Entry Techniques. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Issue 2. Art. No.: CD006583. DOI: 10.1002/14651858
Merlin TL, Hiller JE, Maddern GJ et al (2003) Systematic review of the safety and effective-ness of methods used to establish pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 90:668–679
Molloy D, Kaloo PD, Cooper M, Nguyen TV (2002) Laparoscopic entry: a literature review and analysis of techniques and complications of primary port entry. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 42:246–255
Jacobson MT, Osias J, Bizhang R et al (2002) The direct trocar technique: an alternative approach to abdominal entry for laparoscopy. JSLS 6:169–174
Madan AK, Menachery S (2006) Safety and Efficacy of Initial Trocar Placement in Morbidly Obese Patients. Arch Surg. 141:300–303
Agresta F, DeSimone P, Ciardo LF et al (2004) Direct trocar insertion versus Veress needle in nonobese patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures. Surgical Endoscopy 18:1778–81
Schäfer M, Lauper M, Krähenbühl L (2001) Trocar and Veress needle injuries during la-paroscopy. Surg Endosc 15:275–80
Merchea A, Dozois EJ, Wang JK, Larson DW (2012) Anatomic Mechanisms for Splenic Injury During Colorectal Surgery. Clin Anat 25:212–217
Holubar SD, Wang JK, Wolff BG et al (2009) Splenic Salvage After Intraoperative Splenic Injury During Colectomy. Arch Surg 144:1040–1045
Wakeman CJ, Dobbs BR, Frizelle FA et al (2008) The impact of splenectomy on outcome after resection for colorectal cancer: a multicenter, nested, paired cohort study. Dis Col Rect 51:213–217
Kirchhoff P, Clavien PA, Hahnloser D (2010) Complications in colorectal surgery: risk factors and preventive strategies. Patient Saf Surg 4:5
Oktar GL (2007) Iatrogenic major venous injuries incurred during cancer surgery. Surg Today 37:366–369
Hubner M, Demartines N, Muller S (2008) Prospective randomized study of monopolar scissors, bipolar vessel sealer and ultrasonic shears in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 95:1098–1104
Hubner M, Hahnloser D, Hetzer F et al (2007) A prospective randomizedcomparison of two instruments for dissection and vessel sealing in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 21:592–594
Noble EJ et al (2011) Experimental comparison of mesenteric vessel sealing thermal damage between one bipolar and two ultrasonic shears devices Br J Surg 98:797–800
Kirchhoff P, Dincler S, Buchmann P (2008) A multivariate analysis of potential risk factors for intra- and postoperative complications in 1316 elective laparoscopic colorectal procedures. Ann Surg 248:259–265
Redan A, McCarus SD (2009) Protect the Ureters Jay. JSLS 13:139–141
Delacroix SE Jr, Winters JC (2010) Urinary Tract Injures: Recognition and Management Clin Colon Rectal Surg 23:104–129
Larach SW, Patankar SK, Ferrara A (1997) Complications of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Analysis and comparison of early vs. latter experience. Dis Colon Rectum 40:592–596
Fröber R (2007) Surgical anatomy of the ureter. BJU Int 100:949–965
Chahin F, Dwivedi A, Paramesh A et al (2002) The implications of lighted ureteral stenting in laparoscopic colectomy. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 6:49–52
Nam YS, Wexner SD (2002) Clinical Value of Prophylactic Ureteral Stent Indwelling During Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery. J Korean Med Sci 17:633–635
Emam T, Cuschieri A (2003) How safe is high-power ultrasonic dissection. Ann Surg 237:186–191
van Goor H (2007) Consequences and complications of peritoneal adhesions. Colorectal Dis 9:25–34
Crafa F (2011) Anastomoses très basses avec CAD. III Journées francophones de Chirurgie Colorectale sous Coelioscopie, Napoli 23–25/11/2011
de Manzini N (2012) Unpublished data
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Italia
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kosuta, M., Cosola, D., de Manzini, N. (2013). Intraoperative Accidents. In: de Manzini, N. (eds) Rectal Cancer. Updates in Surgery. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2670-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2670-4_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Milano
Print ISBN: 978-88-470-2669-8
Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2670-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)