Skip to main content

Intraoperative Accidents

  • Chapter
Book cover Rectal Cancer

Part of the book series: Updates in Surgery ((UPDATESSURG))

  • 1477 Accesses

Abstract

In spite of standardization and improvements in technique, colorectal surgery remains subject to an intraoperative accident rate that has undergone a slight increase with the advent of laparoscopy [1]. This fact can be correlated to the technical limitations of laparoscopic access, which are its two-dimensional imaging and the loss of tactile sensation [1]. The most updated studies report a global incidence of intraoperative accidents of 10-13% [2, 3]; for rectal surgery this incidence is significantly higher than for colonic surgery (13% vs. 7%) [3]. The most frequent intraoperative complications are hemorrhage, lesions to the bowel, spleen, urethra and bladder, as well as technical difficulties during anastomosis. The risk of technical difficulties during mini-invasive operations for colorectal cancer is higher for surgeons in the learning phase, a phase that is often longer for laparoscopy than for the same procedures carried out in laparotomy; the learning curve for laparoscopic rectal surgery seems to be about 35 operations [4–6]. In analyzing the learning curve of a junior surgeon, the most significant data are the complication rate, the length of the hospital stay and the incidence of re-hospitalization, and not the conversion rate and the length of the operation; indeed, if the operating time does not go down as the experience of the surgeon increases, this often reflects the fact that the more complex individual cases are generally performed by expert surgeons [7].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. D’Annibale A, Morpurgo E, Fiscon V et al (2004) Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases. Dis Colon Rectum 47:2162–2168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tarik S, Arman K, Sanket S et al (2011) Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Is Associated With a Higher Intraoperative Complication Rate Than Open Surgery. Ann Surg 253:35–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al, for the MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopicassisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jamali FR, Soweid AM, Dimassi H et al (2008) Evaluating the degree of difficulty of laparo-scopic colorectal surgery. Arch Surg 143:762–767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Fazio VW (2005) Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections. Ann Surg 242:83–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Li GX, Yan HT, Yu J et al (2006) Learning curve of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao 26:535–538

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kirchhoff P, Clavien PA, Hahnloser D (2010) Complications in colorectal surgery: risk factors and preventive strategies. Patient Safety in Surgery 4:5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shawki S, Bashankaev B, Denoya P et al (2009) What is the definition of “conversion” in laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Surg Endosc 23:2321–2326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Thorpe H, Jayne DG, Guillou PJ et al (2008) Patient factors influencing conversion from laparoscopically assisted to open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 95:199–205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chan ACY, Poon JTC, Fan JKM et al (2008) Impact of conversion on the long-term outcome in laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 22:2625–2630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tan PY, Stephens JH, Rieger NA, Hewett PJ (2008) Laparoscopically assisted colectomy: a study of risk factors and predictors of open conversion. Surg Endosc 22:1708–1714

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Li JCM, Lee JFY, Ng SSM et al (2010) Conversion in laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for right colon cancer: risk factors and clinical outcomes. Int J Colorectal Dis 25:983–988

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang C, Wexner SD, Safar B et al (2009) Conversion in laparoscopic surgery: does intraoperative complication influence outcome? Surg Endosc 23:2454–2458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chan ACY, Poon JTC, Fan JKM et al (2008) Impact of conversion on the long-term outcome in laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 22:2625–2630

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gonzalez R, Smith CD, Mason E et al (2006) Consequences of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 49:197–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ahmad G, Duffy JMN, Phillips K et al (2008) Laparoscopic Entry Techniques. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Issue 2. Art. No.: CD006583. DOI: 10.1002/14651858

    Google Scholar 

  17. Merlin TL, Hiller JE, Maddern GJ et al (2003) Systematic review of the safety and effective-ness of methods used to establish pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg 90:668–679

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Molloy D, Kaloo PD, Cooper M, Nguyen TV (2002) Laparoscopic entry: a literature review and analysis of techniques and complications of primary port entry. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 42:246–255

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jacobson MT, Osias J, Bizhang R et al (2002) The direct trocar technique: an alternative approach to abdominal entry for laparoscopy. JSLS 6:169–174

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Madan AK, Menachery S (2006) Safety and Efficacy of Initial Trocar Placement in Morbidly Obese Patients. Arch Surg. 141:300–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Agresta F, DeSimone P, Ciardo LF et al (2004) Direct trocar insertion versus Veress needle in nonobese patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures. Surgical Endoscopy 18:1778–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schäfer M, Lauper M, Krähenbühl L (2001) Trocar and Veress needle injuries during la-paroscopy. Surg Endosc 15:275–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Merchea A, Dozois EJ, Wang JK, Larson DW (2012) Anatomic Mechanisms for Splenic Injury During Colorectal Surgery. Clin Anat 25:212–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Holubar SD, Wang JK, Wolff BG et al (2009) Splenic Salvage After Intraoperative Splenic Injury During Colectomy. Arch Surg 144:1040–1045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wakeman CJ, Dobbs BR, Frizelle FA et al (2008) The impact of splenectomy on outcome after resection for colorectal cancer: a multicenter, nested, paired cohort study. Dis Col Rect 51:213–217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kirchhoff P, Clavien PA, Hahnloser D (2010) Complications in colorectal surgery: risk factors and preventive strategies. Patient Saf Surg 4:5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Oktar GL (2007) Iatrogenic major venous injuries incurred during cancer surgery. Surg Today 37:366–369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hubner M, Demartines N, Muller S (2008) Prospective randomized study of monopolar scissors, bipolar vessel sealer and ultrasonic shears in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 95:1098–1104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hubner M, Hahnloser D, Hetzer F et al (2007) A prospective randomizedcomparison of two instruments for dissection and vessel sealing in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc 21:592–594

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Noble EJ et al (2011) Experimental comparison of mesenteric vessel sealing thermal damage between one bipolar and two ultrasonic shears devices Br J Surg 98:797–800

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kirchhoff P, Dincler S, Buchmann P (2008) A multivariate analysis of potential risk factors for intra- and postoperative complications in 1316 elective laparoscopic colorectal procedures. Ann Surg 248:259–265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Redan A, McCarus SD (2009) Protect the Ureters Jay. JSLS 13:139–141

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Delacroix SE Jr, Winters JC (2010) Urinary Tract Injures: Recognition and Management Clin Colon Rectal Surg 23:104–129

    Google Scholar 

  34. Larach SW, Patankar SK, Ferrara A (1997) Complications of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Analysis and comparison of early vs. latter experience. Dis Colon Rectum 40:592–596

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Fröber R (2007) Surgical anatomy of the ureter. BJU Int 100:949–965

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Chahin F, Dwivedi A, Paramesh A et al (2002) The implications of lighted ureteral stenting in laparoscopic colectomy. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 6:49–52

    Google Scholar 

  37. Nam YS, Wexner SD (2002) Clinical Value of Prophylactic Ureteral Stent Indwelling During Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery. J Korean Med Sci 17:633–635

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Emam T, Cuschieri A (2003) How safe is high-power ultrasonic dissection. Ann Surg 237:186–191

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. van Goor H (2007) Consequences and complications of peritoneal adhesions. Colorectal Dis 9:25–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Crafa F (2011) Anastomoses très basses avec CAD. III Journées francophones de Chirurgie Colorectale sous Coelioscopie, Napoli 23–25/11/2011

    Google Scholar 

  41. de Manzini N (2012) Unpublished data

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Kosuta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kosuta, M., Cosola, D., de Manzini, N. (2013). Intraoperative Accidents. In: de Manzini, N. (eds) Rectal Cancer. Updates in Surgery. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2670-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2670-4_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-2669-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2670-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics