Advertisement

Quantification of NeuroPET: When to Use It

  • Alfred Buck
Conference paper

Abstract

One of the advantages of positron emission tomography (PET) is the possibility of calculating quantitative values for all kinds of parameters, such as glucose metabolism, receptor densities, blood flow, and many other parameters.

Keywords

Positron Emission Tomography Standard Uptake Value Washout Rate Perfusion Positron Emission Tomography Automatic Data Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Haense C, Herholz K, Jagust WJ, Heiss WD (2009) Performance of FDG PET for detection of Alzheimer’s disease in two independent multicentre samples (NEST-DD and ADNI). Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 28:259–266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Herholz K, Salmon E, Perani D et al (2002) Discrimination between Alzheimer dementia and controls by automated analysis of multicenter FDG PET. Neuroimage 173:02–316Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Herholz K, Westwood S, Haense C, Dunn D (2011) Evaluation of a calibrated (18)F-FDG PET score as a biomarker for progression in Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment. J Nucl Med 52:1218–1226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Treyer V, Jobin M, Burger C et al (2003) Quantitative cerebral H2(15)O perfusion PET without arterial blood sampling, a method based on washout rate. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 30:572–580PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim E, Howes OD, Kim BH et al (2011) The use of healthy volunteers instead of patients to inform drug dosing studies: a [(1)(1)C]raclopride PET study. Psychopharmacology 217:515–523PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marcellino D, Kehr J, Agnati LF, Fuxe K (2012) Increased affinity of dopamine for D2-like versus D1-like receptors. Relevance for volume transmission in interpreting PET findings. Synapse 66:196–203PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Floeth FW, Sabel M, Stoffels G et al (2008) Prognostic value of 18F-fluoroethyl-L-tyrosine PET and MRI in small nonspecific incidental brain lesions. J Nucl Med 49:730–737PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alfred Buck
    • 1
  1. 1.Nuclear MedicineUniversity Hospital ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations