Skip to main content

Scanning Electron Microscopy: Notes on Basic Techniques for Investigating Pulmonary and Airway Structures

  • Chapter
Lungscapes
  • 30 Accesses

Abstract

The eye is probably the most important “sensor” of our body. Not only does it provide information about our surroundings, but this information is then used by the brain to control our interaction with the surroundings through feedback. It is a common observation that we cannot see structural details of either very minute objects or of larger objects at great distance, so the idea of magnifying images of the things that surround us has always fascinated man. From the earliest times, discoveries of magnifying devices such as drops of water, convex metal mirrors, and lenses have been reported, with records dating back to 1000 b.c. or even earlier. The Assyrians had a convex lens around 700 b.c., and the Greeks and Romans also wrote about magnifying lenses [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Scharf D (1979) Magnifications, photography with the scanning electron microscope. Muller, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bradbury S (1968) The microscope, past and present. Pergamon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burgess J, Marten M, Taylor R (1987) Microcosmos. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  4. McMullan D (1989) SEM, past, present and future. J Microsc 155: 373–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chescoe D, Goodhew PJ (1990) The operation of transmission and scanning electron microscopes. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  6. Watti M (1985) Principles and practice of electron microscopy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  7. Scala C, Pasquinelli G (1987) Microscopia elettronica a scansione in biologia. Editrice CLUEB, Bologna

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kessel RG, Shith CY (1976) Scanning electron microscopy in biology. Springer Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ross N, Morgan AJ (1990) Cryopreparation of thin biological specimens for electron microscopy: methods and applications. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hayat (1981) Fixation for electron microscopy. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. McDowell EM, Trump BF (1976) Histologic fixatives suitable for diagnostic light and electron microscopy. Arch Pathol Lab Med 100: 405–414

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hulbert WC, Forster BB, Laird W, Phil CE, Walker DC (1982) An improved method for fixation of the respiratory epithelial surface with the mucous and surfactant layers. Lab Invest 47: 354363

    Google Scholar 

  13. Litman RB, Barrnett RJ (1982) The mechanism of the fixation of tissue components by osmium tetroxide via hydrogen binding J Ultrastr Res 38: 63–86

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kelley RO, Dekker RAF, Bluemink JG (1973) Ligand-mediated osmium binding: its application in coating biological specimens for scanning electron microscopy. J Ultrastruct Res 45: 254–258

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mathieu O, Claassen H, Weibel ER (1978) Differential effect of glutaraldehyde and buffer osmolarity on cell dimensions: a study on lung tissue. J Ultrastruct Res 63: 20–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Arborgh B, Bell P, Brunk U, Collins VP (1976) The osmotic effect of glutaraldehyde fixation. A transmission electron microscopy. Scanning electron microscopy and cytochemical study. J Ultrastruct Res 56: 331–350

    Google Scholar 

  17. Karnovsky MJ (1965) A formaldeide-glutaraldehyde fixative of high osmolarity for use in electron microscopy. J Cell Biol 27:137–138 A

    Google Scholar 

  18. Katsumoto T, Naguro T, Iino A, Takagi A (1981) The effect of tannic acid on the preservation of tissue culture cells for scanning electron microscopy. J Electron Microsc (Tokyo) 30: 177182

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gil J, Weibel ER (1968) The role of buffers in lung fixation with glutaraldehyde and osmium tetroxide. J Ultrastruct Res 25: 331–348

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Schiff RI, Gennaro JF (1979) The role of the buffer in the fixation of biological specimens for transmission and scanning electron microscopy. Scanning 2: 135–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Boyde A (1976) Do’s and don’ts in biological specimen preparation for the SEM. Scanning Electron Microsc 9: 697–734

    Google Scholar 

  22. Anderson TF (1951) Techniques for the preservation of three-dimensional structure in preparing specimens for the electron microscope. Trans NY Acad Sci (Ser II ) 13: 130–134

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bastacky J, Hayes TL, Gelinas RP (1985) Quantitation of shrinkage during preparation for scanning electron microscopy: human lung. Scanning 7: 134–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mazzone RW, Komblau S, Durand CM (1980) Shrinkage of lung after chemical fixation for analysis of pulmonary structure-function relations. J Appl Physiol 48: 382–385

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wollweber L, Stacke R, Gothe U (1981) The use of a simple methods to avoid cell shrinkage during SEM preparation. J Microsc 121: 185–189

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Inouè T, Osatake H (1988) A new drying method of biological specimens for scanning electron microscopy, the t-butyl-alcohol freeze-drying method. Arch Histol Cytol 51: 53–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Echlin P (1975) Sputter coating techniques for scanning electron microscopy. Scanning Electron Microsc 8: 217–224

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Echlin P (1974) Coating techniques for scanning electron microscopy. Scanning Electron Microsc 7: 1019–1028

    Google Scholar 

  29. Holland VF (1976) Some artifacts associated with sputter-coated samples observed at high magnifications in the scanning electron microscope. Scanning Electron Microsc 9: 71–74

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ingram P, Morosoff N, PopeL, Allen F, Tisher C (1976) Some comparisons of the techniques of sputter (coating) and evaporative coating for scanning electron microscopy. Scanning Electron Microsc 9: 75–82

    Google Scholar 

  31. Boyde A, Wood C (1969) Preparation of animal tissues for surface-scanning electron microscopy. J Microsc 90: 221–249

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Murakami T (1974) A revised tannin-osmium method for non-coated scanning electron microscope specimens. Arch Histol Jap 36: 189–193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sasaki K (1988) A simple method to observe intracellular organelles with the scanning electron microscope. J Electron Microsc (Tokyo) 37: 171–173

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Boyde A (1972) Biological specimen preparation for the scanning electron microscope, a overview. Scanning Electron Microsc 5: 257–264

    Google Scholar 

  35. Malick LE,Wilson RB (1975) Evaluation of a modified technique for SEM examination for vertebrate specimens without evaporated metal layers. Scanning Electron Microsc 8: 259–266

    Google Scholar 

  36. Akahori I, Ishi H, Naka I, Yoshida H (1988) A simple freeze-drying device using t-butyl alcohol for SEM specimens. J Electron Microsc 37: 351352

    Google Scholar 

  37. Osatake H, Atom K, Mitsushima A, Tanak K (1980) A simple method of freeze-drying for scanning electron microscopy. J Electron Microsc (Tokyo) 29: 72–74

    Google Scholar 

  38. Demsey A, Kawka D, Stackpole C (1978) Cell surface membrane organization revealed by freeze-drying. J Ultrastruct Res 62: 13–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Fujikawa S, Suzuki T, Ishikawa T, Sakurai S, Hasegawa Y (1988) Continuous observation of frozen biological material with cryo-scanning electron microscope and freeze-replica by a new cryosystem. J Electron Microsc (Tokyo) 37: 315–322

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Humphreys WJ, Spurlock BO, Johnson S (1974) Critical point drying of ethanol-infiltrated cryofractured biological specimens for scanning electron microscopy. Scanning Electron Microsc 7: 275–282

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tokunaga J, Edanaga N, Fujita T, Adachi K (1974) Freeze cracking of scanning electron microscope specimens. A study of the kidney and spleen. Arch Histol Jap 37: 165–182

    Google Scholar 

  42. Boyde A (1974) Freezing, freeze-fracturing and freeze-drying in biological specimen preparation for the SEM. Scanning Electron Microsc pp 10431046

    Google Scholar 

  43. Roth J, Meyer HW (1972) Electron microscopic studies in mammalian lungs by freeze-etching: III. The bronchiolar cells with special consideration of the Clara cells. Exp Pathol 7: 71–83

    Google Scholar 

  44. Anderson PM (1979) The respiratory system. In: Hodges CM, Hallowes RC (eds) Biomedical research application of scanning electron microscopy, vol 1. London, pp 177–202

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Braga, P.C. (1992). Scanning Electron Microscopy: Notes on Basic Techniques for Investigating Pulmonary and Airway Structures. In: Braga, P.C., Allegra, L. (eds) Lungscapes. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2255-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2255-3_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-2257-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2255-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics