Guidelines on acute postoperative pain management

  • G. Savoia
  • G. Scibelli
  • R. Gammaldi
Part of the Topics in Anaesthesia and Critical Care book series (TIACC)

Abstract

In high-technology countries, the level of care in intensive care units or recovery units is high, whereas on many general wards the standards of acute pain therapy are low. “Standards” are derived from the sources that legitimately set the standards of knowledge and practice in the dominant medical care system. Standards are intended to be applied rigidly and in virtually all cases. Violation should trigger thoughts of malpractice. “Practice guidelines” aim at decreasing inappropriate variations in practice and reducing excessive expenses. They are appropriate for the majority of patients and should be followed in most cases. Guidelines are not intended to function as standards or absolute requirements.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Wulf H, Neugebauer E (1997) Guidelines for postoperative pain therapy. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 10. 380–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Miaskowski C (1994) Pain management: quality assurance and changing practice. Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Pain. IASP Press, Seattle, pp 75–96Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    American Society of Anaesthesiologists Task Force on Pain Management, Acute Pain Section (1995) Practice guidelines for acute pain management in the perroperative setting. Anaesthesiology 82: 1071–1081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    BDA & BDC (1992) Agreement on the organization of postoperative pain management. Association of German Anaesthesiologists and of German Surgeons (in German) Chirurg 31. 222–236Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    American Pain Society Quality of Care Committee (1995) Quality improvement guidelines for the treatment of acute pain and cancer pain. JAMA 274: 1874–1880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carpenter RL, Abram SE, Bromage PR, Rauck RL (1996) Consensus statement on acute pain management Reg Anaesth 21 (Suppl 6): 152–156Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    FISM (Federazione delle Società Medico-Scientifiche Italiane) (1996) Raccomandazioni per la produzione, disseminazione ed implementazione di linee-guida di comportamento pratico. Milano, pp 1–24Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Breivik H (1995) Benefits, risks and economics of postoperative pain management programmes. Bailheres Clin Anaesthesiol 9. 403–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McQuay H, Moore A (1997) The concept of postoperative care. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 10: 369–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    DuBose RA, Berde CB (1997) Respiratory effects of oproids. IASP Newsletter. IASP Press, Seattle, pp 3–5Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rawal N, Allvin R and the EURO Pain Study Group on Acute Pain (1996) Epidural and intrathecal opioids for postoperative pain management in Europe — a 17-nation questionnaire study of selected hospitals. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 40: 1119–1126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aguilar JL, Benhamou D, Bonnet F, Dahl J, Rawal N, Rubin A (1997) ESRA guidelines for the use of epidural opioids. Int Monitor 9 (2): 3–8Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wedel DJ, Horlocker TT (1996) Risks of regional anaesthesia — infectious, septic. Reg Anaesth 21: 57–61Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lehmann KA (1997) Update of patient-controlled analgesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 10: 374–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gruppo di studi SIAARTI per la terapia del dolore. Raccomandazioni per il trattamento del dolore postoperatorio Minerva Anestesiol 64(6):26–29Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Verlag Italia, Milano 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Savoia
  • G. Scibelli
  • R. Gammaldi

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations