Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Valutazione neuropsicologica

  • Chapter
Guida alla valutazione medico-legale del danno neurologico

  • 697 Accesses

Riassunto

Questa sezione approfondisce e in parte riprende argomenti già trattati nel volume. Suo scopo è di offrire uno strumento di comprensione degli esami neuropsicologici, così spesso “misteriosi” all’apparenza, ma determinanti in ogni perizia che preveda la valutazione delle funzioni corticali superiori. Si pensi in particolare ai pazienti con demenza e ai traumatizzati cranici, come a tutti i periziandi in cui le lesioni frontali e la perdita di abilità cognitive sono la regola piuttosto che l’eccezione.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliografia essenziale

  1. Faglioni P (1990) Il Lobo Frontale, in Manuale di Neuropsicologia. In: Denes G, Pizzamiglio L (eds) Zanichelli, Milano, pp 701–750

    Google Scholar 

  2. Campbell W (2005) DeJong’s the neurologic examination. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alexander MP, Stuss DT (2000) Disorders of frontal lobe functioning. Seminars in Neurology 20:427–437

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Filley CM (2000) Clinical neurology and executive dysfunction. Seminars in speech and language 21(2):95–108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lezak MD (1978) Subtle sequelae of brain damage. Perplexity, distractibility, and fatigue. Am J Phys Med 57(1):9–15

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lezak MD (1989) Assessment of the behavioral consequences of head trauma. A.R. Liss, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mesulam MM (2000) Principles of behavioral and cognitive neurology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  8. Passingham RE (1998) Attention to action. In: The prefrontal cortexexecutive and cognitive functions. Roberts AC, Robbins TW, Weiskrantz L (eds) Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  9. Della Sala S, Baddeley A, Papagno C, Spinnler H (1995) Dual-task paradigm: a means to examine the central executive. Ann N Y Acad Sci 769:161–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Spinnler H, Tognoni G (1987) Standardizzazione e taratura italiana di test neuropsicologici. The Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences 6

    Google Scholar 

  11. Reitan RM (1958) Validity of the Trial Making Test as an indicator of organic brain damage. Perceptual and Motor Skills 8:271–276

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wilson B, Cockburn J, Baddeley AD (1985) The Rivermead Behavioral Memory Test. Thames Valley Test, Bury St. Edmunds, UK

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shallice T (1982) Specific impairment of planning. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 298:199–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Luria AR (1966) Higher cortical functions in man. New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stroop JR (1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 18:643–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Berg EA (1948) A simple objective treatment for measuring flexibility in thinking. Journal of General Psychology 39:15–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Nelson HE (1976) A modified card sorting test sensitive to frontal lobe defects. Cortex 12(4):313–324

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shallice T, Evans ME (1978) The involvement of the frontal lobes in cognitive estimation. Cortex 14(2):294–303

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Raven JC (1949) Progressive matrices (1947), Sets A, Ab, B: Board and Book Forms. London

    Google Scholar 

  20. Novelli G, Papagno C, Capitani E, et al. (1986) Tre test clinici di ricerca e produzione lessicale. Taratura su soggetti normali. Archivio di Psicologia, Neurologia e Psichiatria 47:477–506

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ruff RM, Light RH, Evans RW (1987) The Ruff Figural Fluency Test: A normative study with adults. Developmental Neuropsychology 3:313–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kirshner HS (2004) Approachers to Intellectual and Memory Impairments. In: Bradley WG, Daroff RB, Fenichel GM, Jankovich J (eds) Neurology in Clinical Practice. 4th edition. Butteworth-Heinneman, pp 65–74

    Google Scholar 

  23. Orsini A, Grossi D, Capitani E, et al. (1987) Verbal and spatial immediate memory span. Normative data from 1355 adults and 1112 children. Ital J Neurol Sci 8(6):539–548

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Carlesimo GA, Buccione I, Fadda L, et al. (2002) Standardizzazione di due test di memoria per uso clinico. Breve racconto e Fig. 19.di Rey. Nuova Rivista di Neurologia 12(1):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  25. Caffarra P, Vezzadini G, Dieci F, et al. (2001) Rey-Osterrieth complex figure: normative values in an Italian population sample. Neurol Sci 22(6):443–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rey A (1958) Mèmorisation d’une sèries de 15 mots en 5 rèpetitions. In: Rey A (ed) L’examen clinique en psychologie. Presses Universitaires de France, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  27. Huber W., Poeck K, Weniger D, Willmes K (1996) Aachener Aphasie Test. Versione italiana: Luzzatti C, Willmes K, De Bleser R. Organizzazioni Speciali. Ref Type: Catalog

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ciurli P, Marangolo P, Basso A (1996) Esame del linguaggio. 2nd editino. Firenze, Organizzazioni Speciali

    Google Scholar 

  29. Miceli G, Laudanna A, Burani C, Capasso A (1994) Batteria per l’Analisi dei Deficit Afasici. CEPSAG, Roma

    Google Scholar 

  30. De Renzi E, Vignolo LA (1962) The token test: A sensitive test to detect receptive disturbances in aphasics. Brain 85:665–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Goodglass H, Kaplan E (2000) Boston Naming Test. Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  32. Associazione per lo Sviluppo delle Ricerche Neuropsicologiche (1985) Test per l’acalculia. Firenze, Organizzazioni Speciali

    Google Scholar 

  33. De Renzi E, Motti F, Nichelli P (1980) Imitating gestures. A quantitative approach to ideomotor apraxia. Arch Neurol 37(1):6–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. De Renzi E, Lucchelli F (1988) Ideational apraxia. Brain 111(Pt 5)1173–1185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Osterrieth PA (1944) Le test de copie d’une figure complex: contribution a l’étude de la perception et de la mémoire. Archives de Psychologie 30:286–356

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wechsler D (1955) WAIS Manual. The Psychological Corporation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  37. Warrington EK, James M (1991) A new test of object decision: 2D silhouettes featuring a minimal view. Cortex 27(3):370–383

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Diller L, Ben-Yishay Y, Gerstman LJ, et al. (1974) Studies in cognition and rehabilitation in hemiplegia. New York University Medical Centre Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine, New York

    Google Scholar 

  39. Albert ML (1973) A simple test of visual neglect. Neurology 23(6):658–664

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Wilson B, Cockburn J, Halligan P (1987) Behavioural Inattention Test (BIT). Thames Valley Test Co, Bury St. Edmunds, UK

    Google Scholar 

  41. Benton AL, Sivan AB, Hamsher K, et al. (2000) Test di riconoscimento di volti ignoti. Firenze, Organizzazioni Speciali

    Google Scholar 

  42. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12(3):189–198

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Brazzelli M, Capitani E, Della Sala S, et al. (1994) M.O.D.A. Milan Overall Dementia Assessment: uno strumento italiano per la diagnosi dell’Alzheimer. Giunti, Firenze

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wechsler D (1997) Wais-R Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale — revised. Giunti, Firenze

    Google Scholar 

  45. Goldberg G (2001) Imitation and matching of hand and finger postures. Neuroimage 14:132–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Sylvie Piacentini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Piacentini, S. (2012). Valutazione neuropsicologica. In: Guida alla valutazione medico-legale del danno neurologico. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2074-0_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-2074-0_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-2073-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-2074-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation