Advertisement

Culture Implications on Future Work Design—New Technologies and Collaborations for Controllers and Pilots

  • Pernilla Ulfvengren
  • Lena Mårtensson
  • Fredrik Barchéus
Conference paper

Abstract

Future air traffic management is facing major changes that will bring pilots and controllers, two professional cultures, closer with new technologies and collaboration. Earlier research on safety culture and organisational change such as mergers and implementing new system designs have been rewieved to identify applicable implications for the future work design of the air-ground joint system. The HILAS project has developed relevant tools for both intra- and inter-organisational processes for maintenance and flight operations and may function as a role model. It is concluded that preventive measures for facilitating successful future system operations is to develop similar integrating tools for knowledge management, process modeling, training modules for cross-learning, reporting, risk models as well as performance measures and indicators.

Keywords

Safety culture ATC Flight operations Work design 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank all of the HILAS team for great fun!

References

  1. 1.
    Akselsson R, Ek Å, Koornneef F, Stewart S, Ward M (2009) Resilience safety culture. In: Proceedings of International Ergonomic Association, IEA, Bejing in China, August 2009Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arvidsson M (2006) Organizational psychology and safety culture in air traffic control. Doctoral thesis, Lund University. Lund, Sweden, ISBN 13: 978-91-628-6903-8Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barchéus F, Ulfvengren P, Mårtensson L, (2010) Communication enablers for delegation—a relational model for the new ATM system. Submitted to HCI-Aero, Florida, November 2010Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barchéus F, Mårtensson L (2003) New air traffic management systems—views of Air traffic controllers. Preprints of the 8th IFAC/IFIP/IFORS/IEA symposium on automated systems based on human skill and knowledge, Göteborg, Sweden, 22–24 Sept 2003Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barchéus F, Mårtensson L (2007) Air traffic management and future technology—the views of the controllers. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety—an International Journal 6(1):1–16. Ashgate Publishing Ltd, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boy AG (2009) The orchestra: a conceptual model for function allocation and scenario-based engineering in multi-agent safety-critical systems. In: proceedings of European conference on cognitive ergonomics. Helsinki, Finland, October 2009.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Díaz-Cabrera D, Ramos-Sapena Y, Hernández-Fernaud E, Casenave S (2009) Culture and the implementation of Knowledge Management Systems (KMS). HILAS deliverable and draft manuscript. Project Number 516181. Funded by European Commission—Sixth FPGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eurocontrol (1998) Air traffic management strategy for 2000+Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    HILAS Annex 1 (2005) HILAS description of work. Project number 516181, Funded by European Commission—Sixth Framework ProgrammeGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hollnagel E (2007) Flight decks and free flight: Where are the system boundaries? Appl Ergonomics 38(4):409–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    ICAO (2008) Safety Management Manual (SMM), 2nd edn. Draft document 9859Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    McDonald N (2009) Transformation: human factors and organisational change. HILAS project report, deliverable and draft manuscript to book in preparation. Project Number 516181. Funded by European commission—Sixth framework programmeGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McDonald N, Ulfvengren P, Ward M, (eds) (2009) Human role in aviation. HILAS project deliverables and draft manuscripts to book in preparation, Project number 516181, Funded by European commission—Sixth framework programmeGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Midkiff AH, Hansman RJ (1993) Identification of important “party line” information elements and the implications for situational awareness in the datalink environment. Air Traffic Control Quarterly 1:5–30Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rantanen EM, Kokayeff NK (2002) Pilot errors in copying air traffic control clearances. In: Proceedings of the 46th annual meeting of the human factors and ergonomics society, pp 145–149, Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics SocietyGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rasmussen J, Pejtersen AM, Goodstein LP (1994) Cognitive systems engineering. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reason J (1997) Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Ashgate Publishing Limited, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ulfvengren P (2007) Study on how to increase reporting in aviation. In: Proceedings of Nordic ergonomic society, NES 2007Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ulfvengren P, Rignér J, Mårtensson L (2009) Integrating safety and innovation in aviation. In: Proceedings of international ergonomics association, IEA 2009, Bejing, ChinaGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ulfvengren P, Rignér J, Ydalus M, Mårtensson L (2009) SAS HILAS participation and experiences. HILAS report, deliverable and draft manuscript to book in preparation. Project number 516181. Funded by European commission—Sixth framework programmeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia Srl 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pernilla Ulfvengren
    • 1
  • Lena Mårtensson
    • 1
  • Fredrik Barchéus
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Industrial Work ScienceKTH, Royal Institute of Technology, School of Industrial Technology and ManagementStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations