Advertisement

Simulation Study for Driver Behaviour Analysis as a Basis for the Design of a Partially Autonomous Driver Assistance System

  • María Alonso
  • M. Henar Vega
  • Óscar Martín
Conference paper

Abstract

This paper is presenting a driver behaviour investigation conducted within the framework of ISi-PADAS (Integrated Human Modelling and Simulation to support Human Error Risk Analysis of Partially Autonomous Driver Assistance Systems) FP7 European Project (September 2008–September 2011). This research has been developed at an initial phase of the project to support the conception of a new driver assistance system, aimed at improving longitudinal driving by means of information, warning and intervention strategies. In this research, the contribution to the system conception is based on providing a knowledge base of driver behaviour through the conduction of simulator experiments. In particular, this paper is aimed at providing a thorough description of the rationale behind the investigation, as well as at describing the methodology and the procedure used for the experiments conduction. Moreover, the main results achieved through this research and how these results are linked to the modelling phase inside the ISi-PADAS project, are covered within this paper.

Keywords

Driver assistance system Driver behaviour Usal and cognitive distraction Driving simulator 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Commission Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) under grant agreement no. FP7-218552, Project ISi-PADAS (Integrated Human Modelling and Simulation to support Human Error Risk Analysis of Partially Autonomous Driver Assistance Systems).

References

  1. 1.
    Engström J, Johansson E, Östlund J (2005) Effects of visual and cognitive load in real and simulated motorway driving. Transport Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 8(2):97–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Horrey WJ, Simons DJ (2007) Examining cognitive interference and adaptive safety behaviours in tactical vehicle control. Ergonomics 50(8):1340–1350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    ISi-PADAS consortium (2008). Integrated human modelling and simulation to support human error risk analysis of partially autonomous driver assistance systems—description of work. ISi-PADAS project, Grant Agreement no. FP7-218552Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee SE, Llaneras E, Klauer S, Sudweeks J (2007) Analyses of rear-end crashes and near-crashes in the 100-Car naturalistic driving study to support rear-signaling countermeasure development. DOT HS 810 846. National Highway Traffic Safety AdministrationGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lesch MF, Hancock PA (2004) Driving performance during concurrent cellphone use: are drivers aware of their performance decrements? Accid Anal Prev 36:471–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Treat JR (1980) A study of pre-crash factors involved in traffic accidents. HSRI Res Rev, 10/11, pp 1–35Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Young K, Regan M (2007) Driver distraction: a review of the literature. In: Faulks IJ, Regan M, Stevenson M, Brown J, Porter A, Irwin JD (eds) Distracted driving. Australasian College of Road Safety, Sydney, NSW, pp 379–405Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia Srl 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CIDAUT Foundation, Parque Tecnológico de BoecilloBoecilloSpain

Personalised recommendations