Exploratory Investigation of Vibration Floor as Potential Collision Warning

  • Christine Mégard
  • Margarita Anastassova
  • Daphné Repain
Conference paper

Abstract

This paper investigates the possibility of using the floor of a car as potential locus of vibratory collision warnings. Arrangements of three actuators were used to provide vibrating floor patterns. DC motors with eccentric mass and suspended on leaf springs were fixed longitudinally at the center of a metallic structure. The actuators can be activated independently to provide different haptic patterns with different possible amplitudes and temporal frequency parameters. Continuously activated patterns, provided by the simultaneous activation of the actuators can be suggested for high level urgency collision warning as they are considered to be mostly associated to unpleasant, urgent and intrusive judgments. Low level amplitude patterns can be proposed for the advice collision warning.

Keywords

Haptic interaction User-centered design 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the subjects of the experiment. The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Commission’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) under grant agreement no 218552 Project Isi-PADAS.

References

  1. 1.
    El Jaafari M, Forzy J-F, Navarro J, Mars F, Hoc J-M (2008) User acceptance and effectiveness of warning and motor priming assistance devices in car driving. In: Proceedings of the humanist conference Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ho C, Tan HZ, Spence C (2005) Using spatial vibrotactile cue to direct visual attention in driving scenes. Transportation Research Part F8, 397–412Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hoggan E, Brewster SA (2007) Designing audio and tactile crossmodal icons for mobile devices. In: Proceedings of ACM international conference on multimodal interfaces (Nagoya, Japan). ACM Press, pp 162–169Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    ISO 9241-920 (2009) Ergonomics of human-system interaction-Part 920: guidance on tactile and haptic interactionsGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jones LA, Sarter NB (2008) Tactile displays: guidance for their design and application. Hum Factors: J Hum Factors Ergonom Soc 50(1):90–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mulder M, Mulder M, vanPaasssen MM, Abbink, DA (2008) Haptic gas pedal feedback. Ergonomics 51(11):1710–1720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Spence C, Ho C (2008) Multisensory interface design for drivers: past, present and future. Ergonomics 51(1):65–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tan HZ, Gray R, Young JJ, Traylor R (2003) A haptic back display for attentional and directional cueing. Haptics-e: The Electron J Haptics Res 3(1):20Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Van Erp JBF, van Veen HAHC (2003) A multipurpose tactile vest for astronauts in the international space station. In: Proceedings of eurohapticsGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Van Erp JBF(2002) Guidelines for the use of vibro-tactile displays in human computer interaction. In: Proceedings Eurohaptics 2002, Wall et al SA, (eds) pp 18–22Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Visell Y, Law A, Cooperstock JR (2009) Touch is everywhere: floor surfaces as ambient haptic interfaces. IEEE Trans Haptics 2(3):148–159Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia Srl 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christine Mégard
    • 1
  • Margarita Anastassova
    • 1
  • Daphné Repain
    • 1
  1. 1.CEA, LIST, The Sensory and Ambient Interfaces LaboratoryFontenay-aux-roses CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations