Advertisement

Effects of Distraction and Traffic Events Expectation on Drivers’ Performances in a Longitudinal Control Task

  • Luca Minin
  • Lorenzo Fantesini
  • Roberto Montanari
  • Fabio Tango
Conference paper

Abstract

Background

In recent studies it has been investigated how the decrease of situation awareness is related to the level of drivers’ attention dedicated to the road and to drivers’ incorrect expectation on traffic events. This paper is aimed at investigating the effects of a distracting visual research task and drivers’ expectations on traffic behaviour on drivers’ on-road performances.

Methods

Twenty drivers were involved in a driving experiment where they were asked to perform several car followings, with and without interacting with a visual research task. Expectations of traffic behaviour were reproduced by varying (i) the lead vehicle speed: proceeding at a variable speed and sudden brake and (ii) size: a car for predictable conditions, a bus (obstructing follower sight) for unpredictable. Average Time Headway and Brake Reaction Time were selected as on-road performance indicators.

Result

Results confirmed literature findings in terms of driver behaviour impairment in the visual research task conditions; at the same time, the unpredictability of lead driver behaviour negatively influenced the longitudinal behaviour, in particular when drivers were asked to also deal with the secondary task.

Conclusion

The interesting aspect of the results is the negative effect on the longitudinal behaviour of the reproduced unexpected events. Even if this is a small scale experiment, significant differences have been found, even worst if drivers also have to deal with a secondary task. Data collected and experiment findings have also been used to design a driver model for the prediction of driver’s distraction, currently under development.

Keywords

Advanced Driver Assistance Systems Automotive environment Modelling distraction Driver vehicle interction 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Commission’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) under grant agreement no. 218552 Project ISi-PADAS.

References

  1. 1.
    Beirness DJ et al (2002) The road safety monitor: driver distraction. Traffic Injury Research Foundation, OntarioGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Endsley MR (1995) Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors 37(1):32–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fiorani M, Mariani M, Tango F, Saroldi A (2005) Saspence—safe speed and safe distance: project overview and customer benefit analysis of a novel driver’s collision avoidance support system. In: Proceedings of the 5th European congress and exhibition on intelligent transport systems and services, Hannover, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Green M (2000) How long does it take to stop? Methodological analysis of driver perception-brake times. Transp Hum Factors 2(3):195–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Houtenbos M, Hagenzieker M, Wieringa P, Hale A (2005) The role of expectations in interaction behaviour between car drivers. In: Underwood G (ed) Traffic and transport psychology: theory and application, Elsevier, Kidlington, Oxford, pp 303–314Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Klauer SG, Dingus TA, Neale VL, Sudweeks JD, Ramsey DJ (2006). The impact of driver inattention on near-crash/crash risk: an analysis using the 100-Car naturalistic driving study data. National highway traffic safety administration technical report, DOT HS 810 594Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee SE, Llaneras E, Klauer S, Sudweeks J (2007) Analyses of rear-end crashes and near-crashes in the 100-car naturalistic driving study to support rear-signaling countermeasure development. National highway traffic safety administration technical report, DOT HS 810 846Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mattes S (2003) The lane change task as a tool for driver distraction evaluation. In: Strasser H, Rausch H, Bubb H (eds) Quality of work and products in enterprises of the future. Ergonomia Verlag, Stuttgart, pp 57–60Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Muhrer E, Vollrath M (2009) Final report for task 1.22: results of the accident analyses. ISI-PADAS European Project public reportGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Singh S (2003) Driver attributes and rear-end crash involvement propensity. National highway traffic safety administration technical report, DOT HS 809 540Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wickens CD (2002) Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theor Issues Ergonomics Sci 3(2):159–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Östlund J, Peters B, Thorslund B et al (2007) Using performance indicators for driver state assessment. Deliverable 2.2.5, adaptive integrated driver-vehicle interface, European Integrated ProjectGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia Srl 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luca Minin
    • 1
  • Lorenzo Fantesini
    • 1
  • Roberto Montanari
    • 1
  • Fabio Tango
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Science and Methods for EngineeringUniversity of Modena and Reggio EmiliaReggio EmiliaItaly
  2. 2.Fiat Research Center (CRF)TurinItaly

Personalised recommendations