Integrating Anticipatory Competence into a Bayesian Driver Model

Conference paper

Abstract

Background

We present a probabilistic model architecture combining a layered model of human driver expertise with a cognitive map and beliefs about the driver-vehicle state to describe the effect of anticipations on driver actions.

Methods

It implements the sensory-motor system of human drivers with autonomous, goal-based attention allocation, and anticipation processes. The model has emergent properties and combines reactive with prospective behavior based on anticipated or imagined percepts obtained from a Bayesian cognitive map.

Results

It has the ability to predict agent’s behavior, to abduct hazardous situations (what could have been the initial situation), to generate anticipatory plans, and control countermeasures preventing hazardous situations.

Conclusions

We demonstrated that the Bayesian-Map-extended BAD-MoB model has the ability to predict agent’s behavior, to abduct hazardous situations (what could have been the initial situation, what could be appropriate behavior), to generate anticipatory plans, and control countermeasures preventing hazardous situations. It was demonstrated that the selection of action and goal evidence has to be planned by a higher cognitive layer residing on top of the BAD-MoB model. An implementation with real expert and novice data has to follow this conceptual study.

Keywords

Anticipatory planning Bayesian cognitive map Probabilistic driver model Bayesian autonomous driver model Mixture-of-behavior model Visual attention allocation Anticipatory plans and control Reactive and prospective behavior Risk and hazardous prevention 

References

  1. 1.
    Alms R et al (2010) Generierung und Optimierung von Sollkursen mittels Expertenwissen und Heuristiken In: Kolrep H, Jürgensohn Th (Hrsgb) Fahrermodellierung. VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf. ISBN 978-3-18-303222-8Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bessiere P, Laugier Ch, Siegwart R (eds) (2008) Probabilistic reasoning and decision making in sensory-motor systems. Springer, Berlin. ISBN 978-3-540-79006-8MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Diard J, Bessiere P (2008) Bayesian maps: probabilistic and hierarchical models for mobile robot navigation. In: Bessiere P, Laugier Ch, Siegwart R (eds) Probabilistic reasoning and decision making in sensory-motor systems. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, pp 153–175Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eilers M, Möbus C (2010/2011) Learning a Bayesian autonomous driver mixture-of-behaviors (BAD-MoB) model . In: Duffy VG (ed) Advances in Applied Digital Human Modeling, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, pp 436–445. ISBN 978-1-4398-3511-1Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Horrey WJ et al (2006) Modeling driver’s visual attention allocation while interacting with in-vehicle technologies. J Exp Psychol 12:67–78Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Koike CC, Bessiere P, Mazer E (2008) Bayesian approach to action selection and attention focusing. In: Bessiere P et al (eds) Probabilistic reasoning and decision making in sensory-motor systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 177–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lebeltel O, Bessiere P, Diard J, Mazer E (2004) Bayesian Robot Programming. Adv Robot 16(1):49–79Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Möbus C, Eilers M (2009) Further steps towards driver modeling according to the Bayesian programming approach. In: Conference Proceedings, HCII 2009, Digital Human Modeling, LNCS (LNAI), Springer, San Diego, pp 413–422. ISBN 978-3-642-02808-3Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Möbus C, Eilers M, Garbe H, Zilinski M (2009) Probabilistic and empirical grounded modeling of agents in (partial) cooperative traffic scenarios. In: HCII 2009, Digital Human Modeling, LNCS (LNAI), Springer, San Diego, pp 423–432. ISBN 978-3-642-02808-3Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Möbus C, Eilers M, Zilinski M, Garbe H (2009) Mixture of behaviors in a Bayesian driver model. In: Lichtenstein A et al (eds) Der Mensch im Mittelpunkt technischer Systeme, VDI Verlag, Düsseldorf, p 96 and pp 221–226 (CD). ISBN 978-3-18-302922-8, ISSN 1439-958XGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Möbus C, Eilers M (2010) Prototyping smart assistance with Bayesian autonomous driver models. In: Mastrogiovanni F, Chong N-Y (eds) Handbook of research on ambient intelligence and smart environments. IGI Global Publications, Hershey (in press)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Möbus C, Eilers M (2010/2011) Mixture-of-behaviors and levels-of-expertise in a Bayesian autonomous driver model. In: Duffy VG (ed) Advances in Applied Digital Human Modeling, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, pp 425–435. ISBN 978-1-4398-3511-1Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pezzulo G, Butz MV, Castelfranchi C (2008) The anticipatory approach: definitions and taxonomies. In: Pezzulo G et al (eds) The challenge of anticipation: a unifying framework for the analysis and design of artificial cognitive systems. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 23–43 LNAI 5225. ISBN 3-540-87701-0Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia Srl 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Learning and Cognitive Systems/Transportation SystemsC.v.O University/OFFISOldenburgGermany

Personalised recommendations