Estimating Traffic System Wide Impacts of Driver Assistance Systems Using Traffic Simulation

Conference paper


There is a need to estimate impacts of proposed driver assistance systems already at early stages of the system development process. Estimations of the impacts of new technologies have to be based on laboratory studies and modelling. This paper presents a traffic simulation based framework for estimation of the traffic system wide impacts of driver assistance systems. The framework includes a two-step methodology. In the first step of the analysis, the considered driver assistance system’s impact on driver behaviour is observed. The second step of the analysis consist of traffic simulation modelling taking into account the system functionality as well as the observed driver behaviour of the considered driver assistance system. Driver behaviour studies for use of the data for traffic simulation modelling is discussed and traffic simulation modelling of different types of driver assistance systems is exemplified by modelling of an overtaking assistant, of in-vehicle virtual rumble strips and of adaptive cruise control.


ADAS Traffic simulation Driver behaviour 



This work was partially sponsored by the Swedish Road Administration.


  1. 1.
    Kesting A, Treiber M, Schönhof M, Kranke F, Helbing D (2007) Jam-avoiding adaptive cruise control (ACC) and its impact on traffic dynamics. In: Schadschneider A, Pöschel T, Kühne R, Schreckenberg M, Wolf DE (eds) Traffic and granular flow ’05. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Toledo T, Albert G, Hakkert S (2007) Impact of active speed limiters on traffic flow and safety simulation-based evaluation. Transp Res Rec 2019:169–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liu R, Tate J (2004) Network effects of intelligent speed adaptation systems. Transportation 31:297–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    ITERATE (2010) IT for error remediation and trapping emergencies. Accessed 1 May 2010Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tapani A (2005) Versatile model for simulation of rural road traffic. Transp Res Rec 1934:169–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hegeman G, Tapani A, Hoogendoorn S (2009) Overtaking assistant assessment using traffic simulation. Transp Res C 17:617–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tapani A (2008) Analysis of rumble strips and driver fatigue using traffic simulation. Adv Transp Stud 14:69–80Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Janson Olstam J, Tapani A (2003) Comparison of car-following models. VTI meddelande 960A. Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute, LinköpingGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tapani A (2008) Traffic simulation modelling of rural roads and driver assistance systems. Dissertation, Linköping UniversityGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Treiber M, Hennecke A, Helbing D (2000) Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations. Phys Rev E 62(2):1805–1824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Treiber M, Kesting A, Helbing D (2006) Delays, inaccuracies and anticipation in microscopic traffic models. Phys A 360:71–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia Srl 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute (VTI)LinköpingSweden
  2. 2.Department of Science and Technology (ITN)Linköping UniversityNorköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations