Advertisement

Modelling and Validating Pilots’ Visual Attention Allocation During the Interaction with an Advanced Flight Management System

  • Florian Frische
  • Jan-Patrick Osterloh
  • Andreas Lüdtke
Conference paper

Abstract

This paper presents the results of our analysis of human pilot behaviour and of a cognitive pilot model. We have performed experiments in a flight simulator including a new 4D flight management system (FMS) in order to gather information about the interaction of human pilots with the new FMS and to validate the performance of the cognitive pilot model. This paper focuses on the visual attention allocation of human pilots and on the validation of the visual perception component of the pilot model.

Keywords

Cognitive Modelling Visual Attention Advanced Flight Management System 

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson JR (2000) Learning and memory. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Connor CE, Egeth HE, Yantis S (2004) Visual attention: bottom-up versus top-down. Curr Biol 14:850–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Diez M, Boehm-Davis A, Holt RW, Pinney ME, Hansberger JT, Schoppek W (2001) Tracking pilot interactions with flight management systems through eye movements. In: 11th international symposium on aviation psychology, Columbus, OhioGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dzaack J (2008) Analyse kognitiver Benutzermodelle fnr die Evaluation von Mensch-Maschine-Systemen. Technische Universität Berlin, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Groner R, Walder F, Groner M (1984) Looking at faces: local and global aspects of scanpaths. In: Gale AG, Johnson F (eds) Theoretical and applied aspects of eye movement research. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Huettig G, Anders G, Tautz A (1999) Mode awareness in a modern glass cockpit attention allocation to mode information. In: Proceedings of the 10th international symposium on aviation psychology, Ohio State University, ColumbusGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Luedtke A, Cavallo A, Christophe L, Cifaldi M, Fabbri M, Javaux D (2006) Human error analysis based on a cognitive architecture. In: Reuzeau F, Corker K, Boy G (eds) Proceedings of the international conference on human–computer interaction in aeronautics (HCI-Aero), Seattle, USA, pp 40–47Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Luedtke A, Osterloh J-P, Mioch T, Rister F, Looije R (2009) Cognitive modelling of pilot errors and error recovery in flight management tasks. In: Proceedings of the 7th international working conference on human error, safety, and system development, Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mumaw RJ, Sarter NB, Wickens CD (2001) Analysis of pilots’ monitoring and performance on an automated flight deck. In: International symposium on aviation psychology, Ohio State University, ColumbusGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Osterloh J-P, Luedtke A (2008) Analyzing the ergonomics of aircraft cockpits using cognitive models. In: Karowski W, Salvendy G (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on applied human factors. USA Publishing, Las VegasGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rasmussen J (1986) Information processing and human–machine interaction: an approach to cognitive engineering. North Holland, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sarter NB, Mumaw RJ, Wickens CD (2007) Pilots’ monitoring strategies and performance on automated flight decks: an empirical study combining behavioural and eye-tracking data. Hum Factors 49(3):347–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia Srl 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Florian Frische
    • 1
  • Jan-Patrick Osterloh
    • 1
  • Andreas Lüdtke
    • 1
  1. 1.OFFIS Institute for Information TechnologyOldenburgGermany

Personalised recommendations