Effective and Acceptable Forward Collision Warning Systems Based on Relationships Between Car-Following Behaviour and Reaction to Deceleration of Lead Vehicle
This study mainly forcused on unnecessary alarms for forward collision warning systems (FCWS) and two driving simulator experiments were conducted to investigate whether considering individual driving characteristics is reasonable for decreases in unnecessary alarms when determining alarm timing. The results indicate that if the average characteristics of car-following behaviour are taken into account when determining alarm timing, unnecessary alarms are not a problem except for drivers who tend to follow a lead vehicle with the short distance between vehicles. Alarm timing based on the particular characteristics of individual car-following behaviour thus has the potential to further decrease unnecessary alarms, independent of driving speed.
KeywordsForward Collision Warning System Alarm Timing Unnecessary Alarms Car-Following Behaviour
This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (A) 18201031 from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT).
- 1.Dingus TA, Jahns SK, Horowitz AD, Knipling R (1998) Human factors design issues for crash avoidance systems. In: Barfield W, Dingus TA (eds) Human factors in intelligent transportation systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey, pp 55–93Google Scholar
- 2.Janssen W, Nilsson L (1993) Behavioural effects of driver support. In: Parkes AM, Fransen S (eds) Driving future vehicle. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 147–155Google Scholar