Flexible Design and Implementation of Cognitive Models for Predicting Pilot Errors in Cockpit Design

  • Jurriaan van Diggelen
  • Joris Janssen
  • Tina Mioch
  • Mark Neerincx
Conference paper

Abstract

This paper describes an integrated design and implementation framework for cognitive models in complex task environments. We propose a task- and human-centered development methodology for deriving the cognitive models, and present a goal-based framework for implementing them. We illustrate our approach by modelling cognitive lockup as an error producing mechanism for pilots, and present the outcomes of the implemented cognitive models that resulted from applying our methods and tools.

Keywords

Aviation Congitive lockup congitive modeling 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The work described in this paper is funded by the European Commission in the 7th Framework Programme, Transportation under the number FP7-211988. This study is part of the research program “Autonomous Training” (V1023) under contract for the Netherlands Department of Defense.

References

  1. 1.
    CLIPS: a tool for building expert systems. http://clipsrules.sourceforge.net/
  2. 2.
    Diggelen J van, Beun RJ, Dignum F, Eijk RM van, Meyer J-J Ch, ANEMONE: An effective minimal ontology negotiation environment. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems (AAMAS06), ACM Press, pp 899–906, 2006Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lüdtke A, Osterloh J-P, Mioch T, Rister F, Looije R (2010). Cognitive modelling of pilot errors and error recovery in flight management tasks. In human error, safety and systems development, LNCS5962, SpringerGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mioch T, Osterloh J-P, Javaux D (2011) Selecting human error types for cognitive modelling and simulation. In: P. C. Cacciabue et al. (eds.), Human modelling in assisted transportation. doi: 10.1007/978-88-470-1821-1_13
  5. 5.
    Neerincx MA, Lindenberg J, Smets N.J.J.M, Bos A, Breebaart L, Grant T, Olmedo-Soler A, Brauer U, Wolff M (2008) The mission execution crew assistant: improving human-machine team resilience for long duration missions. In: Proceedings of the 59th international astronautical congress (IAC2008), GlasgowGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rasmussen J (1983) Skills, rules, knowledge: signals, signs and symbols and other distinctions in human performance models. IEEE Trans: Syst, Man Cybern SMC-13(3):257–266Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Russell SJ, Norvig P (2003) Artificial intelligence: A modern approach. Pearson education. 2nd ed. Prentice Hall, USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia Srl 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jurriaan van Diggelen
    • 1
  • Joris Janssen
    • 1
  • Tina Mioch
    • 1
  • Mark Neerincx
    • 1
  1. 1.TNO Human FactorsSoesterbergThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations