Selecting Human Error Types for Cognitive Modelling and Simulation

Conference paper

Abstract

This paper presents a method that has enabled us to make a selection of error types and error production mechanisms relevant to the HUMAN European project, and discusses the reasons underlying those choices. We claim that this method has the advantage that it is very exhaustive in determining the relevant error types and error production mechanisms, and that the final objects are selected according to explicit requirements, without missing relevant error types and error production mechanisms.

Keywords

Human error Error types Error production mechanism Cognitive modelling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Commission Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no. 211988 (Project HUMAN, http://www.human.aero).

References

  1. 1.
    Boeing Commercial Airplanes (2004) Statistical summary of commercial jet aircraft accidents, worldwide operations, 1959–2003. Boeing Commercial Airplane, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Endsley MR (1999) Situation awareness and human error: designing to support human performance. In: Proceedings of the high consequence system surety conference, AlbuquerqueGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hollnagel E (1998) Cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM). ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Isaac A, Shorrock ST, Kennedy R, Kirwan B, Andersen H, Bove T (2002) Short report on human performance models and taxonomies of human error in ATM (HERA) (No. 1.0). EUROCONTROL (DIS/HUM), BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lüdtke A, Osterloh J-P, Mioch T, Rister F, Looije R (2009) Cognitive modelling of pilot errors and error recovery in flight management tasks. In: Proceedings of the 7th international working conference on human error, safety, and system development, Brussels, 23–25 Sept 2009Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Norman DA (1983) Design rules based on analyses of human error. Commun ACM 26:254–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Orasanu J, Martin L (1998) Errors in aviation decision making: a factor in accidents and incidents. In: Proceedings of HESSD 98: 2nd workshop on human error, safety, and system development. Seattle, pp 100–106Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rasmussen J (1986) Information processing and human-machine interaction: an approach to cognitive engineering. Elsevier Science Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Reason J (1990) Human error. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, UrbanaMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Swain AD, Guttmann HE (1983) A handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications. NUREG/CR-1278, USNRC, Washington, DC 20555Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wickens CD, Hollands JG (1999) Engineering psychology and human performance. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia Srl 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tina Mioch
    • 1
  • Jan-Patrick Osterloh
    • 2
  • Denis Javaux
    • 3
  1. 1.TNO Human FactorsSoesterbergThe Netherlands
  2. 2.OFFIS Institute for Computer ScienceOldenburgGermany
  3. 3.NEXT STEP SOLUTIONSLiegeBelgium

Personalised recommendations