Skip to main content

Idiomatic Language Comprehension: Neuropsychological Evidence

  • Chapter

Abstract

Idioms [1] are conventional expressions, in general deeply connected to culture, whose meaning cannot be derived from an analysis of the constituent words’ typical meanings (e.g., to kick the bucket). Conventionality gives an idea of the strength of the association between an idiomatic expression and its meaning within a given culture and is determined by the discrepancy between the idiomatic phrasal meaning and the meaning we would predict for the collocation if we were to consult only the rules to determine the meanings of the constituents in isolation [2]. Idioms do not form a unitary class and rather vary along a number of syntactic and semantic dimensions [2, 3]. For example, they vary as to their semantic transparency/opacity, which refers to the ease with which the motivation for their structure can be recovered. Idioms can involve figuration and can be originally metaphorical (e.g., take the bull by the horns), even if speakers may not perceive the figure originally involved; in this specific example, a potentially dangerous situation is evoked, which is faced directly; in such a case, the idiom is called transparent. By contrast, an expression such as farsene un baffo (literal translation: make oneself a moustache, meaning to not care about something) is semantically opaque, since the speaker needs to know the stipulated meaning, which cannot be derived either from the image evoked or from the constituent word meanings. Opaque expressions are also based on a historical or cultural motivation, but in most cases, this has since been forgotten or cannot be directly perceived by the speaker [4].

Keywords

  • Match Task
  • Literal Meaning
  • Literal Interpretation
  • Figurative Language
  • Aphasic Patient

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-88-470-1584-5_6
  • Chapter length: 19 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-88-470-1584-5
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gibbs RW (1999) Figurative language. In: Wilson R, Keil F (eds) The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive science. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 314–315

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nunberg G, Sag IA, Wasow T (1994) Idioms. Language 70:491–538

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. Cacciari C, Glucksberg S (1995) Understanding idioms: do visual images reflect figurative meanings? Eur J Cogn Psychol 7:283–305

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  4. Glucksberg S (2001) Understanding figurative language. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  5. Gibbs RW, Nayak, NP, Cutting C (1989) How to kick the bucket and not decompose: analyzability and idiom processing. J Mem Lang 28:576–593

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  6. Gibbs RW, Gonzales GP (1985) Syntactic frozenness in processing and remembering idioms. Cognition 20:243–259

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Colombo L (1993) The comprehension of ambiguous idioms in context. In: Cacciari C, Tabossi P (eds) Idioms: processing, structure, and interpretation. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 163–200

    Google Scholar 

  8. Colombo L (1998) Role of context in the comprehension of ambiguous Iitalian idioms. In: Hillert D (ed) Syntax and semantics, vol 31. Academic Press, New York, pp 379–404

    Google Scholar 

  9. Giora R, Zaidel E, Soroker N et al (2000) Differential effects of right-and left-hemisphere damage on understanding sarcasm and metaphor. Metaphor & Symbol 15:63–83

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nenonen M, Niemi J, Laine M (2002) Representation and processing of idioms: evidence from aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics 15:43–58

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  11. Papagno C, Genoni A (2004) The role of syntactic competence in idiom comprehension: a study on aphasic patients. Journal of Neurolinguistics 17:371–382

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  12. Papagno C, Tabossi P, Colombo M, Zampetti P (2004) Idiom comprehension in aphasic patients. Brain Lang 89:226–234

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rinaldi MC, Marangolo P, Baldassarri F (2004) Metaphor comprehension in right braindamaged patients with visuo-verbal material: a dissociation (re)considered. Cortex 40:479–490

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Burgess C, Chiarello C (1996) Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying metaphor comprehension and other figurative language. Metaphor Symbolic Activity 11:67–84

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  15. Winner E, Gardner H (1977) The comprehension of metaphor in brain-damaged patients. Brain 100:717–729

    CAS  CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stachowiak F, Huber W, Poeck K, Kerschensteiner M (1977) Text comprehension in aphasia. Brain Lang 4:177–195

    CAS  CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Van Lancker D, Kempler D (1987) Comprehension of familiar phrases by left but not by right hemisphere damaged patients. Brain Lang 32:265–277

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kempler D, Van Lancker D, Marchman V, Bates E (1999) Idiom comprehension in children and adults with unilateral brain damage. Dev Neuropsychol 15:327–349

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  19. Papagno C, Curti R, Rizzo S et al (2006) Is the right hemisphere involved in idiom comprehension? A neuropsychological study. Neuropsychology 20:598–606

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tompkins CA, Boada R, McGarry K (1992) The access and processing of familiar idioms by brain-damaged and normally aging adults. J Speech Hear Res 35:626–637

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Swinney DA, Cutler A (1979) The access and processing of idiomatic expressions. J Verb Learn Verb Behav 18:523–534

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  22. Cacciari C, Reati F, Colombo M-R et al (2006) The comprehension of ambiguous idioms in aphasic patients. Neuropsychologia 44:1305–1314

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Papagno C, Caporali A (2007) Testing idiom comprehension in aphasic patients: the effects of task and idiom type. Brain Lang 100:208–220

    CAS  CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hillert D (2004) Spared access to idiomatic and literal meanings: a single-case approach. Brain Lang 89:207–215

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Oliveri M, Romero L, Papagno C (2004) Left but not right temporal lobe involvement in opaque idiom comprehension: a repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation study. J Cognit Neurosc 16:848–855

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  26. Fogliata A, Rizzo S, Reati F et al (2007) The time corse of idiom processing. Neuropsychologia 45:3215–3222

    CAS  CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rizzo S, Sandrini M, Papagno C (2007) The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in idiom interpretation: an rTMS study. Brain Res Bull 71:523–528

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Papagno C, Vallar G (2001) Understanding metaphor and idioms: a single case neuropsychological study in a subject with Down syndrome. J Intern Neuropsychol Soc 7:516–528

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  29. Romero Lauro LJ, Tettamanti M, Cappa SF, Papagno C (2008) Idiom comprehension: a prefrontal task? Cerebral Cortex 18:162–170

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  30. Zempleni MZ, Haverkort M, Renken R, Sotwe LA (2007) Evidence for bilateral involvement in idiom comprehension: an fMRI study. NeuroImage 34:1280–1291

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Hillert DG, Buracas GT (2009) The neural substrates of spoken idiom comprehension. Lang Cognit Proc 24:1370–1391

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  32. Huber-Okrainec J, Blaser SE, Dennis M (2005) Idiom comprehension deficits in relation to corpus calosum agenesis and hypoplasia in children with spina bifida meningomyelocele. Brain Lang 93:349–368.

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kempler D, Van Lancker D, Read S (1988) Proverb and idiom comprehension in Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Dis 2:38–49

    CAS  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  34. Papagno C (2001) Comprehension of metaphors and idioms in patients with Alzheimer’s disease: a longitudinal study. Brain 124:1450–1460

    CAS  CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Papagno C, Cappa SF, Garavaglia P et al (1995) La comprensione non letterale del linguaggio: taratura su soggetti normali. Archivio di Psicologia, Neurologia e Psichiatria 56:402–420

    Google Scholar 

  36. Papagno C, Lucchelli F, Muggia S, Rizzo S (2003) Idiom comprehension in Alzheimer’s disease: the role of the central executive. Brain 126:2419–2430

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rassiga C, Lucchelli F, Crippa F, Papagno C (2009) Ambiguous idiom comprehension in Alzheimer’s disease. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 31:402–411

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Titone D, Holzman PS, Levy DL (2002) Idiom processing in schizophrenia: literal implausibility saves the day for idiom priming. J Abnorm Psychol 111:313–320

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Iakimova G, Passerieux C, Hardy-Baylé M-C (2006) Interpretation of ambiguous idiomatic statements in schizophrenic and depressive patients. Evidence for common and differential cognitive patterns. Psychopathology 39:277–285

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Tavano A, Sponda S, Fabbro F et al (2008) Specific linguistic and pragmatic deficits in Italian patients with schizophrenia. Schiz Res 102:53–62

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  41. Schettino A, Romero Lauro LJ, Crippa F et al (2010) The comprehension of idiomatic expressions in schizophrenic patients. Neuropsychologia 48:1032–1040

    CrossRef  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Papagno, C. (2010). Idiomatic Language Comprehension: Neuropsychological Evidence. In: Balconi, M. (eds) Neuropsychology of Communication. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1584-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1584-5_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-1583-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-1584-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)