Riassunto
Il trattamento d’elezione per la terapia del carcinoma prostatico localizzato è rappresentato dalla prostatectomia radicale; attualmente esistono diverse tecniche chirurgiche, che si sono evolute e raffinate nel tempo. Tradiesse, la più utilizzata è la prostatectomia radicale retropubica (RRP), che può avere un accesso anterogrado o retrogrado a seconda dei casi e delle condizioni anatomiche generali del paziente [1].
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliografia
Sciarra A, Gentile V, De Matteis A et al (2008) Long-term experience with n anatomicale anterograde approach to radical prostatectomy:results in term of positive margin rate. Urol Int 80(2):151–156
Guillonneau B, Vallancien G (2000) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique. J Urol 163(6): 1643–1649
Guillonneau B, el-Fettouh H, Baumert H et al (2003) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncological evaluation after 1000 cases at the Montsouris Institute. J Urol 169:1261–1266
Patel VR, Chammas MF Jr, Shah S (2007) Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a review of the current state of affairs. Int J Clin Pract 61(2):309–314
Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W et al (2009) Retropubic, Laparoscopic, and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Cumulative Analysis of Comparative Studies. Eur Urol 55(5):1037–1063
Hegarty NJ, Kaouk JH (2006) Radical prostatectomy: a comparison of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic techniques. Can J Urol 13 (Suppl 1):56–61
Hakimi AA, Feder M, Ghavamian R (2007) Minimally invasive approaches to prostate cancer: a review of the current literature. Urol J 4(3):130–137
Austoni E, Zanetti G, Ceresoli A et al (1995) Radical perineal and retropubic prostatectomy: comparison of technics. Arch Ital Urol Androl; 67(3):199–202
Bradford TJ, Weizer AZ, Gilbert SM et al (2008) Is residual neurovascular tissue on prostatectomy specimens associated with surgeon intent at nerve-sparing and postoperative quality of life measures? Urol Oncol [Dec 24 Epub ahead of print]
Hatzimouratidis K, Moysidis K, Bekos A et al (2008) What is adequate management to preserve erectile function after unilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy? J Endourol 22(9):2029–2031
Lee SB, Hong SK, Choe G, Lee SE (2008) Periprostatic distribution of nerves in specimens from non-nervesparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 72(4): 878–881
Haab F, Meulemans A, Boccon-Gibod L et al (1995) Clearance of serum PSA after open surgery for benign prostatic hypertrophy, radical cystectomy, and radical prostatectomy. Prostate 26(6):334–338
Gallo L, Perdonà S, Autorino R et al (2007) Vesicourethral anastomosis during radical retropubic prostatectomy: does the number of sutures matter? Urology 69(3):547–551
Bujons Tur A, Montlleó González M, Pascual García X et al (2006) Radical prostatectomy in patients with history of transurethral resection of the prostate. Arch Esp Urol 59(5): 473–478
Allen SD, Thompson A, Sohaib SA (2008) The normal postsurgical anatomy of the male pelvis following radical prostatectomy as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 18(6):1281–1291
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Italia
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lisi, D., Gentilucci, A., Catalano, C. (2010). Anatomia RM e varianti anastomotiche nel paziente prostatectomizzato. In: Passariello, R., Panebianco, V., Di Silverio, F., Sciarra, A. (eds) Imaging RM della prostata. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1516-6_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1516-6_19
Publisher Name: Springer, Milano
Print ISBN: 978-88-470-1515-9
Online ISBN: 978-88-470-1516-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)