Skip to main content

Vulnerability to climate change: mathematics as a language to clarify concepts

  • Chapter
Mathknow

Part of the book series: MS&A ((MS&A,volume 3))

Abstract

Vulnerability is a central concept in climate change related research. Yet, confusion is asserted in the terminology. This chapter presents a formal framework of vulnerability that expresses concepts using mathematics. This requires assumptions to be made explicit and therefore enhances clarity.

The starting point of the framework is the concept of vulnerability in everyday language, which is analyzed into three primitives: an entity, its uncertain future evolution and a notion of harm. These are translated into mathematical concepts, upon which vulnerability is then mathematically defined as an aggregate measuring function. The scientific concept vulnerability is formalized as a refinement of this definition.

The mathematical definitions, general and precise, explain the confusion in the terminology by an interpretation of vulnerability studies in terms of the framework. A gap is revealed between the theoretical definitions that are put forward and the measurements made, and equivocalities concerning the measurements are illustrated.

Mathematical notation appears as a sort of language, une langue bien faite, a language well adapted to its purpose, concise and precise, with rules which, unlike the rules of ordinary grammar, suffer no exception. (Polya)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brooks, N.: Vulnerability, risk and adaptation: A conceptual framework. Tyndall Center Working Paper 38 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Füssel, H.M., Klein, R.J.T.: Climate change vulnerability assessments: an evolution of conceptual thinking. Climatic Change 75(3), 301–329 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hinkel, J.: Transdisciplinary Knowledge Integration. Cases from Integrated Assessment and Vulnerability Assessment. Ph. D. thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ionescu, C.: Vulnerability modeling and monadic dynamical systems. Ph. D. thesis, Freie Universität Berlin (2008, in press)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ionescu, C., Klein, R.J.T., Hinkel, J., Kavi Kumar, K.S., Klein, R.: Towards a formal framework of vulnerability to climate change. Environmental Modeling and Assessment (2008). doi: 10.1007/s10666-008-9179-x

    Google Scholar 

  6. Parry, M.L., Canziani, O.F., Palutikof, J.P., van der Linden, P.J., Hanson, C.E. (eds.): IPCC: Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Janssen, M.A., Ostrom, E.: Resilience, vulnerability and adaptation: A crosscutting theme of the international human dimensions programme on global environmental change. Global Environmental Change 16(3), 237–239 (2006). Editorial

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nakićenović, N., Swart, R. (eds.): Special Report on Emissions Scenarios. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Special Report. Cambridge University Press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schneider, S.H.: Can we estimate the likelihood of climatic changes at 2100? Climatic Change 52, 414–451 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Suppes, P.: The desirability of formalization in science. The Journal of Philosophy 65(20), 651–664 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Thywissen, K.: Components of Risk, A Comparative Glossary. SOURCE — Studies Of the University: Research, Counsel, Education 2 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. UNFCCC: UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE. FCCC/INFORMAL/84 GE.05-62220 (E) 200705 (1992). Available at: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wolf, S., Lincke, D., Hinkel, J., Ionescu, C., Bisaro, S.: Concept clarification and computational tools — a formal framework of vulnerability. FAVAIA Working Paper 8. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany (2008). Available at http://www.pik-potsdam.de/favaia/pubs/ favaiaworkingpaper8.pdf

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Italia, Milan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wolf, S. (2009). Vulnerability to climate change: mathematics as a language to clarify concepts. In: Emmer, M., Quarteroni, A. (eds) Mathknow. MS&A, vol 3. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1122-9_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics