Estratto
La rapida evoluzione della colonscopia virtuale (CV) ha comportato la necessità di una standardizzazione nella refertazione di tale esame. Linee guida standardizzate consentono, infatti, di poter trovare un linguaggio comune tra i radiologi e gli altri specialisti in modo da poter inquadrare i pazienti e decidere quindi l’iter diagnostico e terapeutico più appropriato da seguire. Già il BIRADS (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System), in ambito senologico, ha dimostrato quanto sia importante utilizzare una classificazione comune per inquadrare la patologia senologica, rendendo più semplice una collaborazione e più immediato un confronto tra i risultati ottenuti in centri differenti [1].
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliografia
Ferrucci JT (2000) CT colonography for colorectal cancer screening: lessons from mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:1539–1541
Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR et al (2005) CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 236:3–9
Dachman AH, Zalis ME (2004) Quality and consistency in CT colonography and research reporting. Radiology 230:319–323
Fenlon HM (2002) CT colonography: pitfalls and interpretation. Abdom Imaging 27:284–291
Shinya H, Wolff WI (1979) Morphology, anatomic distribution and cancer potential of colonic polyps. Ann Surg 190:679–683
Bond JH (2001) Clinical relevance of the small colorectal polyp. Endoscopy 33:454–457
Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I et al (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349:2191–2200
Owen DA (1996) Flat adenoma, flat carcinoma, and de novo carcinoma of the colon. Cancer 77:3–6
Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Choi JR et al (2004) Flat colorectal lesions in asymptomatic adults: implications for screening with CT virtual colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:1343–1347
Bond JH (1999) Screening guidelines for colorectal cancer. Am J Med 106(Suppl 1a):7S–10S
Johnson CD, Dachman AH (2000) CT colonography: the next colon screening examination? Radiology 216:331–341
Dukes CE (1932) The classification of cancer of the rectum. J Pathol 35:323–332
Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, O’Brien MJ et al (1993) Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med 328:901–906
van Dam J, Cotton P, Johnson CD et al (2004) AGA future trends report: CT colonography. Gastroenterology 127:970–984
Williams AR, Balasooriya BA, Day DW (1982) Polyps and cancer of the large bowel: a necropsy study in Liverpool. Gut 23:835–842
Koretz RL (1993) Malignant polyps: are they sheep in wolves’ clothing? Ann Intern Med 118:63–68
Eide TJ (1986) Risk of colorectal cancer in adenomabearing individuals within a defined population. Int J Cancer 38:173–176
Stryker SJ, Wolff BG, Culp CE et al (1987) Natural history of untreated colonic polyps. Gastroenterology 93:1009–1013
Yee J, Akerkar G, Hung R et al (2001) Colorectal neoplasia: performance characteristics of CT colonography for detection in 300 patients. Radiology 219:685–692
Macari M, Bini EJ, Jacobs SL et al (2004) Colorectal polyps and cancers in asymptomatic average-risk patients: evaluation with CT colonography. Radiology 230:629–636
Fenlon HM, Nunes DP, Schroy PC 3rd et al (1999) A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. N Engl J Med 341:1496–1503
Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT et al (1997) Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 112:24–28
Bond JH (2000) Polyp guideline: diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance for patients with colorectal polyps. Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Am J Gastroenterol 95:3053–3063
Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I et al (2004) Nonadenomatous polyps at CT colonography: prevalence, size distribution, and detection rates. Radiology 232:784–790
van Stolk RU, Beck GJ, Baron JA et al (1998) Adenoma characteristics at first colonoscopy as predictors of adenoma recurrence and characteristics at follow-up. The Polyp Prevention Study Group. Gastroenterology 115:13–18
Rex DK, Cummings OW, Helper DJ et al (1996) 5-year incidence of adenomas after negative colonoscopy in asymptomatic average-risk persons. Gastroenterology 111:1178–1181
Hofstad B, Vatn MH, Andersen SN et al (1996) Growth of colorectal polyps: redetection and evaluation of unresected polyps for a period of 3 years. Gut 39:449–456
Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC et al (2004) Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 291:1713–1719
Filippone A, Ambrosini R, Fuschi M et al (2004) Preoperative T and N staging of colorectal cancer: accuracy of contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT colonography-initial experience. Radiology 231:83–90
Hara AK, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL et al (2000) Incidental extracolonic findings at CT colonography. Radiology 215:353–357
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Neri, E., Turini, F., Bartolozzi, C. (2008). Refertazione. In: La colonscopia virtuale. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1067-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-1067-3_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Milano
Print ISBN: 978-88-470-1066-6
Online ISBN: 978-88-470-1067-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)