Skip to main content

Clinical Decision Making in Paediatric Anaesthesia

  • Conference paper
  • 932 Accesses

Abstract

Decision making is the cognitive process leading to the selection of a course of action among variations. Every decision-making process produces a final choice. Decision making is said to be a psychological construct. This means that although we can never “see” a decision, we can infer from observable behaviour that a decision has been made. Therefore, we conclude that a psychological event that we call “decision making” has occurred. It is a construction that imputes commitment to action: i.e. based on observable actions, we assume that people have made a commitment to perform the action. If the environment is predictable and routine, some decisions and actions can be relegated to an almost automatic level. In contrast, when there is uncertainty, a sustained level of vigilance and attention may be required. At the highest level of cognitive function we can make a decision to monitor our decision-making process: this is meta-cognition [1]. The spectrum of decision-making in medicine runs from simple to complex and is related to the level of uncertainty. There are a variety of tasks with varying degrees of certainty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Croskerry P (2005) The theory and practice of clinical decision making. Can J Anesth 52:R1–R8

    Google Scholar 

  2. Xiao Y, Mackenzie CF (1997) Uncertainty in trauma patient resuscitation. Proceedings of the 41st annual meeting of the human factors and ergonomic society. Santa Monica, CA.: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, pp 168–172

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dawson NV (1993) Physical judgment in clinical settings: methodological influences and cognitive performance. Clin Chem 39:1468–1480

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gaba DM (1994) Human error in dynamic medical domains. In: Bogner MS (ed). Human Error in Medicine. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate, pp 274–291

    Google Scholar 

  5. McDonald CJ (1996) Medical heuristic: the silent adjudicators of clinical practice. Ann Intern Med 124:56–62

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Roberts R, Rodriguez W, Murphy D et al (2003) Pediatric drug labeling: improving the safety and efficacy of pediatrie therapies. JAMA 290:905–911

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shirkey H (1968) Editorial comment: therapeutic orphans. Pediatrics 72:119–120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fisher QA (1991) Clear for surgery: current attitudes and practices of pediatricians. Clin Pediatr 30:35–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Brody DS (1980) The patient’s role in clinical decision-making. Ann Intern Med 93:718–722

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tait AR, Voepel-Lewis T, Munro HM et al (2001) Parents’ preference for participation in decisions made regarding their child’s anaesthetic care. Paed Anaesth 11:283–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kam PC, Voss TJ, Gold PD et al (1998) Behaviour of children associated with parental participation during induction and general anaesthesia. J Paediatr Child Health 34:29–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Vassey JA, Bogetz MS, Caserza LA et al (1994) Parental upset associated with participation in induction of anaesthesia in children. Can J Anaesth 41:276–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gopal Rao G, Crook M, Tillyer ML (2003) Pathology tests: is the time for demand management ripe at last? J Clin Pathol 56:243–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Munro J, Booth A, Nicholl J (1997) Routine pre-operative testing: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess 1:21–27

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hattersley PG (1971) The Activated Coagulation Time of Whole Blood as a Routine Pre-Operative Screening Test. Calif Med 114:15–18

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. McGill WA, Coveler LA, Epstein BS (1979) Subacute upper respiratory infections in small children. Anesth Analg 58:331–333

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tait AR, Knight PR (1987) Intraoperative respiratory complications in patients with upper respiratory tract infections. Can Anaesth Soc J (Now Can J Anaesth) 34:300–303

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this paper

Cite this paper

Busoni, P. (2008). Clinical Decision Making in Paediatric Anaesthesia. In: Gullo, A. (eds) Anaesthesia, Pain, Intensive Care and Emergency A.P.I.C.E.. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0773-4_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0773-4_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-0772-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-0773-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics