Skip to main content

Abstract

Most clinicians develop “routines”, “protocols”, “standards” or “configurations” for the evaluation and management of diseases they frequently encounter. Especially in anaesthesiology, doctors and nurses are used to working with those standards, dealing with such matters as venous access, spinal anaesthesia and airway management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC), sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, USA. URL: http://www.guideline.gov/

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agency for Quality in Medicine aqumed (Aerztliches Zentrum für Qualität in der Medizin aezq), Berlin, Germany, owned by the German Medical Association (BAEK) and the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (KBV), Germany. URL: http://www.aezq.de

    Google Scholar 

  3. Programma Nazionale Linee Guida, from Piano nazionale per le linee guida (PNLG), Italy URL: http://www.pnlg.it

    Google Scholar 

  4. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), England, UK. URL: http://www.nice.org.uk

    Google Scholar 

  5. Guidelines International Network — G.I.N., Scotland, UK. URL: http://www.g-i-n.net

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sackett DL, Straus ES, Richardson WS et al (2000) Evidence-based Medicine. How to practice and teach EBM. Churchill Livingstone, London

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grimshaw JM, Russell IT (1993) Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. Lancet 342:1317–1322

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Martin J, Schleppers A, Kastrup M et al (2003) Development of standard operating procedures in anaesthesiology and critical care medicine. Anästhesiol Intensivmed 44:871–876

    Google Scholar 

  9. Every NR, Hochman J, Becker R et al (2000) Critical pathways: a review. Circulation 101:461–465

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pelly JE, Newby L, Tito F et al (1998) Clinical practice guidelines before the law: sword or shield? Med J Aust 169: 330–333

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Busse T (1998) OP-Management. R. v. Decker’s Verlag, Hüthig, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wolters U, Schrappe M, Mohrs D et al (2000) Do guidelines bring an improvement in the preoperative course? A study of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis. Chirurg 71:702–706

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ely EW, Meade MO, Haponik EF et al (2001) Mechanical ventilator weaning protocols driven by nonphysician health-care professionals: evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 120:454S–463S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S et al (2001) Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 345:1368–1377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Grüne F (2004) Projektgruppenarbeit und Prozessanalyse: eine praxisorientierte Einführung. In: Lauterbach KW, Schrappe M (eds) Gesundheitsökonomie, Qualitätsmangement und Evidence-based Medicine. Schattauer, Stuttgart, pp 388–397

    Google Scholar 

  16. Arbous MS, Meursing AEE, van Kleef JW et al (2005) Impact of anesthesia management characteristics on serve morbidity and mortality. Anesthesiology 102:257–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kendell J Barthram C (1998) Revised checklist for anaesthetic machines. Anaesthesia 53:887–890

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Montasser AM (1998) A method for assessment of standards of care of anesthesia services in departments with different level of resources. J Clin Monit 14:465–470

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Field MJ, Lohr KN (1990) Clinical practice guidelines. National Academy Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  20. Field MJ, Lohr KN (1992) Guidelines for clinical practice. From development to use. National Academy Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pearson SD, Goulart-Fisher D, Lee TH (1995) Critical pathways as a strategy for improving care: problems and potential. Ann Intern Med 123:941–948

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bero LA, Grilli R, Grimshaw J et al (1998) Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. BMJ 317:465–468

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this paper

Cite this paper

Grüne, F., Ottens, T., Klimek, M. (2007). Standards of care in operating theatres. In: Gullo, A. (eds) Anaesthesia, Pain, Intensive Care and Emergency A.P.I.C.E.. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0571-6_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0571-6_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-0570-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-0571-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics