Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Osteoporosi: le nuove prospettive in ortopedia e traumatologia pp 207–220Cite as

La protesi monocompartimentale del ginocchio

  • Chapter

  • 376 Accesses

Part of the book series: Corsi di perfezionamento in ortopedia e traumatologia ((CORSI))

Estratto

In questi ultimi anni, si è assistito ad una riscoperta della protesi di ginocchio monocompartimentale (mono). Persino negli Stati Uniti si ha una nuova visione della protesizzazione monocompartimentale, grazie agli articoli di Andriacchi e Keblish [1, 2], che hanno permesso di riconsiderare il problema, dopo i primi report negativi.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliografia

  1. Andriacchi TP, Galante JO, Fermier RW (1998) The influence of TKR design on walking and stair-climbing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64:1328–1335

    Google Scholar 

  2. Keblish PA (1994) The cases for unicompartmental knee artroplasty. Orthopaedics 17:853–855

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Confalonieri N (1988) Le ragioni di una scelta. Atti del Convegno Internazionale The Uni Prosthesis of the knee. 27–28 Marzo, Milano, Libreria Cortina Milano, pp 55–62

    Google Scholar 

  4. Marmor L (1977) Results of single compartment arthroplasty with acrylic cement fixation: a rninimum follow-up of two years. Clin Orthop 122:181–189

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Marmor L (1973) The modular Knee. Clin Orthop 94:242–249

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Marmor L (1988) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: 10 to 13 years follow-up study for the treatment of femoral condylar articular defects. Clin Orthop 226:14–18

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Corpe RS, Engh GA (1990) A quantitative assessment of degenerative changes acceptable in the unoperated compartments of knees undergoing unicompartmental replacement. Orthopaedics 13:319–323

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dejour H, Neyret P (1991) Les differentes protheses du genou et leurs problems techniques. Revue du Praticien 41:1447–1455

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Levine WN, Ozuna RM, Scott RD, Thornhill TS (1996) Conversion of failed modern unicompartmental arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 11:797–801

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chassin EP, Mikosz RP, Andriacchi TP, Rosenberg AG (1996) Functional analysis of cemented medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 11:553–559

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mikosz RP, Rosemberg AG (1993) A comparison of postoperative function between unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasties Orthop. Research Society Meeting, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  12. Newman JH, Ackroyd CE, Shah NA (1998) Unicompartmental or total knee replacement? Five years results of a prospective, randomised trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with unicompartmental arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:862–865

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Robertsson O, Borgquist L, Knutson K et al (1999) Use of unicompartmental instead of tricompartmental prostheses for unicompartniental arthrosis in the knee is a cost-effective alternative. 15,437 primary tricompartmental prostheses were compared with 10,624 primary medial or lateral unicompartmental prostheses. Acta Orthop Scand 70:170–175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T et al (2000) Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27.372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Swedwn. Acta Orthop Scand 71:262–267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Squire MW, Callaghan JJ, Goetz DD et al (1999) Unicompartmental knee replacement. A minimum 15 year followup study. Clin Orthop 367:61–72

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Confalonieri N, Manzotti A, Pullen C (2004) Is closet-suction drain necessary in UKA? A prospective randomised study. Knee 11:399–402

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Confalonieri N, Manzotti A, Pullen C (2004) Comparison of a mobile with a fixed tibial bearing unicompartimental knee prosthesis: a prospective randomized trial using a dedicated outcome score. Knee 11:357–362

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Scott RD, Santore RF (1981) Unicondylar unicompartmental replacement for osteoarthrítis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 63:536–544

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kozinn SC, Scott R (1989) Current concepts review: Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71:145–153

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Goutallier D (1991) Indicationes des protheses dans les traitements des affections du genou. Revue du Praticien 41:1472–1475

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Stern SH, Becker MW, Insall JN (1993) Unicondylar Knee arthroplasty: An evaluation of selection criteria. Clinic Orthop 286:143–148

    Google Scholar 

  22. Insall JX (1993) Historical development, classification and caracteristics of knee prosthesis. Surgery of the Knee, Livingstone, pp 677–717

    Google Scholar 

  23. Voss F, Sheinkop MB, Galante JO et al (1995) Miller-Galante unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. 2 to 5 years follow-up evaluations. J Arthroplasty 10:764–771

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Grelsamer RP (1995) Current concepts review: unicompartmental osteoarthrosis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:278–292

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mc Keever DC (1960) Tibial plateau prosthesis. Clin Orthop 18:89–95

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ahlbak S (1968) Osteoathrosis of the knee: a radiographic investigation. Thesis of Karolinska Institute, Stockolm

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schai PA, Suh JT, Thornhill TS, Scott RD (1998) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in middle-aged patients: a 2-to 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 13:365–372

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Jackson DW, Simon TM (1996) Condrocyte transplantation. Arthroscopy 12:732–738

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hangody L, Kish G, Karpati Z et al (1997) Arthroscopic autogenous osteochondral mosaicplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5:262–267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Macintosh D, Hunter GA (1972) The use of hemiarthroplasty prosthesis for advanced osteoarthrosis and rheumatoid of arthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 54:244–255

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Cartier P, Chaib S (1987) Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. 2–10 year follow-up evaulation. J. Arthroplasty 2:157–162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Stockelman RE, Pohl KP (1991) The long efficacy of unicompartimental arthroplasty of the knee. Clin Orthop 271:88–95

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Christensen NO (1991) Unicompartimental prosthesis for gonarthrosis. A series of 575 knees from Swedish hospital. Clin Orthop 273:165–169

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Larsson SE, Larsson S, Lundkvist S (1988) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A prospective consecutive series followed for six to 11 years. Clin Orthop 232:177–181

    Google Scholar 

  35. Heck DA, Marmor L, Gibson A, Rougraff BT (1993) Unicompartniental knee arthroplasty. A multicenter investigation with long-term follow-up evaluation. Clin Orthop 286:157–159

    Google Scholar 

  36. Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ (1998) The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. A ten years survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:983–989

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Carr A, Keyes G, Miller R et al (1993) Medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. A survival study of the Oxford meniscal knee Clin Orthop 295:205–213

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Goodfellow JW, O’Connor J (1986) Clinical results of the Oxford knee. Surface arthroplasty of the tibio-femoral joint with a meniscal bearing prosthesis. Clin Orthop 205:21–42

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Goodfellow JW, Kershaw CJ, Benson MK, O’Connor JJ (1988) The Oxford knee for unicompartmental osteoarthritis. The first 103 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 70:692–701

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Mackinnon J, Young S, Baily RA (1988) The St. George sledge for unicompartmental replacement of the Knee. A prospective study of 115 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 70:217–223

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Scott RD, Cobb AG, McQueary FG, Thornhill TS (1991) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Eight to twelve year follow-up evaluation with survivorship analysis. Clin Orthop 271:96–100

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Witvoet J, Peyache MD (1993) Protheses unicompartmentaires du genou type Lotus dans le traitment des gonarthrosis lateralisees: resultats de 135 cas avec un recuil moyen de 4,6 ans. Rev Chir Orthop 79:565–579

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Mackenzie JR. Sullivan PM (1993) Ten year follow-up of unicompartmental knee replacement Orthrop Trans 17:1077–1082

    Google Scholar 

  44. Cameron HU, Jung YB (1988) A comparison of unicompartmental knee replacement with total knee replacement. Orthop Rev 17:983–988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Rougraff BT, Heck DA, Gibson AE (1991) A comparison of tricompartmental and unicompartmental arthroplasty for treatment of gonarthrosis. Clin Orthop 273:157–163

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Laurencin CT, Zelicof SB, Scott RD, Ewald FC (1991) Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient: a comparative study. Clin Orthop 273:151–156

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Tabor OB Jr, Tabor OB (1998) Uni arthroplasty: a long term follow up study. J Arthroplasty 13:373–379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Broughton NS, Newman JH, Baily RA (1986) Unicompartmental replacement and high tibial osteotomy for osteoarthrosis of the knee. A comparative study after 5–10 years follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 68:447–452

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Jackson M, Sarangi PP, Newman JH (1994) Revision total knee arthroplasty. Comparison of outcome following primary proximal tibial osteotomy or unicompartmental arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 9:539–539

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Mallory TI, Danyi J (1983) Unicompartmental total knee arthroplasty: a five to nine years follow-up study of 42 procedures. Clin Orthop 175:135–139

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Laskin RS (1978) Unicompartmental tibio-femoral resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60:182–186

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Insall J, Aglietti P (1980) A five to seven years follow-up, uni-condylar arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62:1329–1335

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Barrett WP, Scott RD (1987) Revision of failed unicondylar unicompartimental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:1328–1335

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Bert LM, Smith R (1997) Failures of metal-backed unicompartmental arthroplasty. Knee 4:41–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Mc Callum JD, Scott RD (1995) Duplication of medial erosion in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:726–728

    Google Scholar 

  56. Ottaviani C, Confalonieri N (1993) L’artroprotesi monocompartimentale Miller-Galante nel trattamento dell’artrosi del ginocchio. Minerva Ortop e Traumatol 44(3)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Romagnoli S (1998) La protesi mono nel compartimento esterno. Atti del Convegno Internazionale The Uni Prosthesis of the Knee. 27–28 Marzo, Milano, Libreria Cortina Milano, pp 75–79

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ulivi M, Benigni GA, Confalonieri N (1993) Tecnica chirurgica di impianto di artroprotesi monocompartimentale Miller-Galant C. Minerva Ortop e Traumatol 44(3)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Confalonieri N, Manzotti A (2004) Navigation and robots. J Orthop Trauma 5:137–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Confalonieri N, Manzotti A, Pullen C, Ragone V (2005) Computer assisted technique versus intra and extramedullary alignement systems in TKR: a radiological comparison. Acta Orthop Belg 71:703–709

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Fehring TK, Mason JB (2005) Catastrophic complications of MIS hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:711–714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Woolson ST, Mow CS, Syquia JF et al (2004) Comparison of primary THR performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:1353–1358

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Bonutti PM (2005) Pitfalls and complications of MIS and quad. sparing: top 10 mistakes. Syllabus International Course MIS meets CAOS, 19–21 May Indianapolis (Indiana) USA, pp 346–349

    Google Scholar 

  64. Howe DJ, Taunton OD Jr, Engh GA (2004) Retained cement after unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:2283–2286

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Mazzarello P, Calligaro AL, Calligaro A (2001) Giulio Bizzozero: a pioneer of cell biology. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2:776–781

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Bonutti PM, Mont MA, McMahon M et al (2004) Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86[Suppl 2]:26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Struttura Complessa di Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Istituti Clinici di Perfezionamento (CTO), Milano

    N. Confalonieri

Authors
  1. N. Confalonieri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Confalonieri, N. (2006). La protesi monocompartimentale del ginocchio. In: Osteoporosi: le nuove prospettive in ortopedia e traumatologia. Corsi di perfezionamento in ortopedia e traumatologia. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0546-4_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0546-4_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-0545-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-0546-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation