Abstract
There has been a growth in interest in schemes that involve “paying for pills by results” (Pollock, 2007) i.e. “paying for performance” rather than merely “paying for pills”. Hard-pressed health care payers want to know that they are getting what they are paying for — health and other benefits for patients. Pharmaceutical companies are not prepared to accept prices that they think do not reflect the innovative value that their expensive R&D investments are bringing to patients, the health care system and the broader economy. Paying for outcomes delivered is a way of “squaring the circle”. Payers know they are getting value. Companies get a return that incentivises future innovation.
Keywords
- National Health Service
- Expand Disability Status Scale
- Health Econ
- Evidence Collection
- Outcome Uncertainty
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Boggild M, Palace J, Barton P, Ben-Shlomo Y, Bregenzer T, Dobson C, et al. Multiple sclerosis risk sharing scheme: two year results of clinical cohort study with historical comparator. BMJ. 2009; 339: 4677.
Carlson JJ, Sullivan SD, Garrison LP, Neumann PJ, Veenstra DL. Linking payment to health outcomes: a taxonomy and examination of performance-based reimbursement schemes between healthcare payers and manufacturers. Health Policy. 2010;96(3):179–190.
Cook JP, Vernon JA, Manning R. Pharmaceutical risk-sharing agreements. Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(7):551–556.
de Pouvourville, G. “Risk-sharing agreements for innovative drugs: a new solution to old problems?” Eur J Health Econ. 2006; 7(3):155–157.
Eckermann S, Willan AR. Expected value of information and decision making in HTA. Health Econ. 2007;16:195–209.
Eckermann S, Willan AR. Globally optimal trial design for local decision making. Health Econ. 2009;18:203–216.
Lilford RJ. Response from chair of scientific advisory committee. BMJ. 2010;341:c3590.
McCabe C, Chilcott J, Claxton K, Tappenden P, Cooper C, Roberts J, et al. Continuing the multiple sclerosis risk sharing scheme is unjustified. BMJ. 2010;340:1786.
Moldrup C. No cure no pay. BMJ. 2005;330(7502):1262–1264.
Pollock A. Pricing Pills by the Results. New York Times; 14th July 2007.
Puig Peiró, R. Mestre-Ferrandiz J, Sussex J, Towse A. Literature review on Patient Access Schemes, Flexible Pricing Schemes and Risk Sharing Agreements for medicines. Podium presentation. ISPOR 14th Annual European Congress, Madrid, Spain: 5-8 November 2011. Available at: http://www.ispor.org/research_pdfs/39/pdffiles/RS1.pdf [Last accessed 28 November 2011]
Raftery J. Multiple sclerosis risk sharing scheme: a costly failure. BMJ. 2010; 40:1672.
Richards RG. MS risk sharing scheme. Some clarification needed. BMJ. 2010;341:3589.
Scolding N. The multiple sclerosis risk sharing scheme. BMJ. 2010;340:2882.
SCRIP. NICE set to recommend Stelara for psoriasis. SCRIP World Pharmaceutical News. August 17th 2009.
Sendi PP, Briggs AH. Affordability and cost-effectiveness: decision-making on the cost-effectiveness plane. Health Econ. 2001;10:675–680.
Towse A. Value-based pricing, research and development, and patient access schemes. Will the United Kingdom get it right or wrong? Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;70(3):360–366.
Towse A, Garrison LP Jr. Can’t get no satisfaction? Will pay-for-performance help? Toward an economic framework for understanding performance-based risk-sharing agreements for innovative medical products. Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(2):93–102.
Williamson S. Patient access schemes for high-cost cancer medicines. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(2):111–112.
Wlodarczyk JH, Cleland LG, Keogh AM, McNeil KD, Perl K, Weintraub RG, et al. Public funding of bosentan for the treatment of pulmonary artery hypertension in Australia: cost effectiveness and risk sharing. Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24(9):903–915.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Healthcare Ibérica SL.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Towse, A., Garrison, L., Puig-Peiró, R. (2011). The use of pay-for-performance for drugs: Can it improve incentives for innovation?. In: Incentives for Research, Development, and Innovation in Pharmaceuticals. Economía de la Salud y Gestión Sanitaria. Springer Healthcare, Madrid. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-84-938062-7-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-84-938062-7-9_6
Publisher Name: Springer Healthcare, Madrid
Print ISBN: 978-84-938062-1-7
Online ISBN: 978-84-938062-7-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)