Advertisement

Plant Tolerance to Combined Stress: An Overview

Chapter
  • 668 Downloads

Abstract

The demand for food is predicted to increase by 70% in 2050 due to increasing world population. Efforts are being made to increase food production. However, abiotic and biotic stresses, which tend to reduce crop yield and grain quality, are hindering these efforts. Significant improvement in crop productivity can be accomplished by developing plants tolerant to multiple abiotic and biotic stresses. Plants adapt and tolerate multiple stresses using sophisticated biochemical and molecular mechanisms. These are mediated by reactive oxygen species (ROS) and phytohormones such as abscisic acid, ethylene, jasmonic acid and salicylic acid which in turn regulate ion channels and kinase cascades. Several transcription factors (TFs) including WRKY, ERF, NAC, and MYB TFs are involved in this process. Understanding these known and novel mechanisms is an important step toward developing tolerance to multiple stresses. Future directions in this field for enhancing crop productivity are discussed.

Keywords

Biotic stress Abiotic stress Phytohormones Multiple stresses Cross-tolerance 

References

  1. AbuQamar S, Luo H, Laluk K, Mickelbart MV, Mengiste T (2009) Crosstalk between biotic and abiotic stress responses in tomato is mediated by the AIM1 transcription factor. Plant J 58(2):347–360CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed IM, Cao F, Zhang M, Chen X, Zhang G, Wu F (2013) Difference in yield and physiological features in response to drought and salinity combined stress during anthesis in Tibetan wild and cultivated barleys. PloS One 8(10):e77869CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Andreasson E, Ellis B (2010) Convergence and specificity in the Arabidopsis MAPK nexus. Trends Plant Sci 15:106–113CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Asselbergh B, De Vieesschauwer D, Hofte M (2008) Global switches and fine-tuning-ABA modulates plant pathogen defense. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 21:709–719CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Atkinson NJ, Urwin PE (2012) The interaction of plant biotic and abiotic stresses: from genes to the field. J Exp Bot 63:3523–3543. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers100 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Birchler JA (2015) Engineered minichromosomes in plants. Chromosom Res 23:77–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowler C, Fluhr R (2000) The role of calcium and activated oxygen as signals for controlling cross-tolerance. Trends Plant Sci 5:241–246CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Capiati DA, Pais SM, TellezIñon MT (2006) Wounding increases salt tolerance in tomato plants: evidence on the participation of calmodulin-like activities in cross tolerance signaling. J Exp Bot 57:2391–2400CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dhawi F, Datta R, Ramakrishna W (2015) Mycorrhiza and PGPB modulate maize biomass, nutrient uptake and metabolic pathways in maize grown in mining-impacted soil. Plant Physiol Biochem 97:390–399CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Duan L, Dietrich D, Ng CH, Chan PMY, Bhalerao R, Bennett MJ, Dinneny JR (2013) Endodermal ABA signaling promotes lateral root quiescence during salt stress in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant Cell 25(1):324–341CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Jalmi SK, Sinha AK (2015) ROS mediated MAPK signaling in abiotic and biotic stress – striking similarities and differences. Front Plant Sci 6:769CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Jan AT, Singhal P, Haq QMR (2013) Plant abiotic stress: deciphering remedial strategies for emerging problem. J Plant Interact 8(2):97–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kissoudis C, van de Wiel C, Visser RGF, van der Linden G (2014) Enhancing crop resilience to combined abiotic and biotic stress through the dissection of physiological and molecular crosstalk. Front Plant Sci 5:207CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Koga H, Dohi K, Mori M (2004) Abscisic acid and low temperatures suppress the whole plant-specific resistance reaction of rice plants to the infection of Magnaporthe grisea. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 65(1):3–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li K, Ramakrishna W (2011) Effect of multiple metal resistant bacteria from contaminated lake sediments on metal accumulation and plant growth. J Hazard Mater 189:531e539Google Scholar
  16. Li K, Pidatala VR, Shaik R, Datta R, Ramakrishna W (2014) Integrated metabolomics and proteomic approaches dissect the effect of metal-resistant bacteria on maize biomass and copper uptake. Environ Sci Technol 48:1184–1193CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Luo S, Li J, Stoddard TJ, Baltes NJ, Demorest ZL, Clasen BM, Coffman A, Retterath A, Mathis L, Voytas DF, Zhang F (2015) Non-transgenic plant genome editing using purified sequence-specific nucleases. Mol Plant 8(9):1425–1427Google Scholar
  18. Mauch-Mani B, Mauch F (2005) The role of abscisic acid in plant-pathogen interactions. Curr Opin Plant Biol 8:409–414CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Mittler R, Blumwald E (2010) Genetic engineering for modern agriculture: challenges and perspectives. Annu Rev Plant Biol 61:443–462CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. O’Brien JA, Benková E (2013) Cytokinin cross-talking during biotic and abiotic stress responses. Front Plant Sci 4:451PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Pandey P, Ramegowda V, Senthil-Kumar M (2015) Shared and unique responses of plants to multiple individual stresses and stress combinations: physiological and molecular mechanisms. Front Plant Sci 6:723CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Pantin F, Monnet F, Jannaud D, Costa JM, Renaud J, Muller B, Bhalerao R, Simonneau T, Genty B (2013). The dual effect of abscisic acid on stomata. New Phytol 197(1): 65–72. doi: 10.1111/nph.12013
  23. Rejeb IB, Pastor V, Mauch-Mani B (2014) Plant responses to simultaneous biotic and abiotic stress: molecular mechanisms. Plants 3(4):458–475CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Rivero RM, Mestre TC, Mittler R, Rubio F, Garcia-Sanchez F, Martinez V (2014) The combined effect of salinity and heat reveals a specific physiological, biochemical and molecular response in tomato plants. Plant Cell Environ 37(5):1059–1073CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Rizhsky L, Liang H, Mittler R (2002) The combined effect of drought stress and heat shock on gene expression in tobacco. Plant Physiol 130(3):1143–1151CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Saxena I, Srikanth S, Chen Z (2016) Cross talk between H2O2 and interacting signal molecules under plant stress response. Front Plant Sci 7:570CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Sewelam N, Kazan K, Schenk PM (2016) Global plant stress signaling: reactive oxygen species at the cross-road. Front Plant Sci 7:187CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Shaik R, Ramakrishna W (2012) Bioinformatic analysis of epigenetic and microRNA mediated regulation of drought responsive genes in rice. PloS One 7(11):e49331CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Shaik R, Ramakrishna W (2013) Genes and co-expression modules common to drought and bacterial stress responses in Arabidopsis and rice. PloS One 8(10):e77261CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Shaik R, Ramakrishna W (2014) Machine learning approaches distinguish multiple stress conditions using stress-responsive genes and identify candidate genes for broad resistance in rice. Plant Physiol 164:481–495CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Thaler JS, Bostock RM (2004) Interactions between abscisic acid mediated responses and plant resistance to pathogens and insects. Ecology 85:48–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ton J, Flors V, Mauch-Mani B (2009) The multifaceted role of ABA in disease resistance. Trends Plant Sci 14(6):310–317CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Verma V, Ravindran P, Kumar PP (2016) Plant hormone-mediated regulation of stress responses. BMC Plant Biol 16:86CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Vinocur B, Altman A (2005) Recent advances in engineering plant tolerance to abiotic stress: achievements and limitations. Curr Opin Biotechnol 16(2):123–132CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Vleesschauwer DD, Xu J, Höfte M (2014) Making sense of hormone-mediated defense networking: from rice to Arabidopsis. Front Plant Sci 5:611CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang H, Wang H, Shao H, Tang X (2016) Recent advances in utilizing transcription factors to improve plant abiotic stress tolerance by transgenic technology. Front Plant Sci 7:67PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Yasuda M, Ishikawa A, Jikumaru Y, Seki M, Umezawa T, Asami T, Nakashita AM, Kudo T, Shinozaki K, Yoshida S, Nakashita H (2008) Antagonistic interaction between systemic acquired resistance and the abscisic acid-mediated abiotic stress response in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 20:1678–1692CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer (India) Pvt. Ltd. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Biochemistry and Microbial SciencesCentral University of PunjabBathindaIndia

Personalised recommendations