Power and Leveraging in a Disability Context

  • Madhura NagchoudhuriEmail author
  • Srilatha Juvva
Part of the Dynamics of Asian Development book series (DAD)


This chapter explores the dynamic of use of power by subordinate groups particularly persons with disability, through leveraging their vulnerable status, and argues for a healthy use of power and agency. People with disability have often been viewed as “dependent”, a burden or victims of a “personal tragedy” and have remained marginalized and invisible in the society. Consequently, the notion of a person with an impairment having “agency” or having power in any shape or form including the most basic form of having power over oneself is difficult to imagine. This notion has led to persons with disability systematically being conditioned to become “helpless” and dependent. However, this paper argues through the use of illustrations and anecdotal evidence that developing an understanding of disability as “socially constructed” is essential to realize personal power for persons with disability. Persons with disability no matter how disenfranchised they are have the potential ability to exercise the “power within” to become empowered themselves and also work towards empowering others both disabled and non-disabled. This may be done by partnering with others in positive ways to co-create power rather than using power in negative ways by leveraging their disability.


Power Agency Leverage Disability Abilities Partnering 


  1. Bhambhani, M. (1999). The burden of women with disabilities. Actionaid Disability News, 10(1&2), 22–24.Google Scholar
  2. Buckingham, J. (2011). Writing histories of disability in India: Strategies of inclusion. Disability & Society, 26(4), 419–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Campbell, F. K. (2008). Exploring internalized ableism using critical race theory. Disability & Society, 23(2), 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chakravarti, U. (2008). Burden of caring: Families of the disabled in urban India. Indian Journal of Gender Studies, 15(2), 341–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dalyrymple, J., & Burke, B. (1995). Anti-oppressive practice: Social care and the law. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Dempsey, I., & Foreman, P. (1997). Toward a clarification of empowerment as an outcome of disability service provision. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 44(4), 287–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Douglas, D. (2004). Self-advocacy: Encouraging students to become partners in differentiation. Roeper Review, 26(4), 223–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elwan, A. (1999). Poverty and disability. A Background Paper for the World Development Report, Banque Mondiale, Washington.Google Scholar
  9. Fearon, J. D. (1999). What is identity (as we now use the word)? Retrieved from on September 17, 2012.
  10. Fine, M., & Asch, A. (1988). Disability beyond stigma: Social interaction, discrimination, and activism. Journal of Social Issues, 44, 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  12. Hardiman, R., & Jackson, B. W. (1997). Conceptual foundations for social justice courses. In M. Adams, L. A. Bell, & P. Griffin (Eds.), Teaching for diversity and social justice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Martin, R. (1971). The concept of power: A critical defence. The British Journal of Sociology, 22(3), 240–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rapp, C. A., & Goscha, R. J. (2006). The strengths model: Case management with people with psychiatric disabilities (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Reid-Cunningham, A. R., & Fleming, V. C. (2009). Theories of disability: Findings from an analysis of textbooks on human behavior and the social environment. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 19(1), 10–25. Retrieved September 5, 2011, from Taylor and Francis online database.Google Scholar
  16. Scotch, R. K. (2009). “Nothing About Us Without Us”: Disability rights in America. OAH Magazine of History, 23(3), 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Smith, S. R. (2008). Social justice and disability: Competing interpretations of the medical and social models. In Arguing about disability. Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Vago, S. (1989). Social change. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  19. Weber, L. (2001). Understanding race, class, gender and sexuality: A conceptual framework. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.Google Scholar
  20. Young, I. M. (2000). Five faces of oppression. In M. Adams, W. J. Blumenfeld, R. Castaneda, H. W. Hackman, M. L. Peters, & X. Zuniga (Eds.), Readings for diversity and social justice: An anthology on racism, antisemitism, sexism, heterosexism, ableism and classism (pp. 31–35). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Equity and Justice for Children and Families, School of Social WorkTata Institute of Social SciencesMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.Centre for Disability Studies and Action, School of Social WorkTata Institute of Social SciencesMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations