Skip to main content

Examining Equity in Spatial Distribution of Recreational and Social Infrastructure in Delhi

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

A significant indicator of marginalization in Indian cities is the mismatch between infrastructure demand and supply. Accessibility studies have demonstrated how different areas within the same city enjoy variable amounts of accessibility to social infrastructure like schools and parks. Core areas of Indian cities generally enjoy good levels of accessibility while newly developing peripheral areas suffer most from the lack of adequate social infrastructure. Planning processes have failed to keep pace with market-led development. Sub-optimal levels of accessibility to social infrastructure can have negative implications on human development leading to increased marginalization of communities. This paper examines the accessibility to parks enjoyed by residents of Delhi’s Zone-E bordering Ghaziabad and Noida. It claims that the master plan mechanism in Delhi has failed to ensure equitable access to parks. More specifically, it argues that the master plan mechanism has failed to recognize that actual densities on ground are far higher than those used while planning for social infrastructure. Additionally, the presence of physical barriers like expressways exacerbates the lack of accessibility since they discourage crossing by pedestrians and cyclists. The paper concludes by suggesting ways to arrive at a more equitable distribution of social infrastructure through preparation of local accessibility plans using participatory methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the case of physical infrastructure like water supply and sanitation, Central Public Health and Environmental Engineering Organization (CPHEEO) manuals are used.

  2. 2.

    Alternatively known as development plan in several Indian cities. A master plan is a long term perspective plan for guiding the sustainable planned development of the city. This document lays down the planning guidelines, policies, development codes and space requirements for various socio-economic activities supporting the city population during the plan period.

  3. 3.

    An administrative zone out of the fifteen that the National Capital Territory (NCT) of Delhi is divided into. A detailed discussion is presented later.

  4. 4.

    For more on town planning schemes, please refer Ballaney (2013) who writes extensively on the development planning-town planning scheme mechanism that has proved to be a popular method of land development in Gujarat.

  5. 5.

    It must be also mentioned that Lama-Rewal (2007) and Mahadevia et al. (2014b) warn about the problematic nature of residents welfare association led local governance mechanisms as they may sideline the voices of the marginalized.

References

  • Ballaney, S., (2013). Supply of land for development: Land readjustment experience in Gujarat, India. In M. Permezel & V. Quinlan (Eds.), Nairobi: United Nations Human Settlements Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batty, M., & Longley, P. (1994). Fractal cities: A geometry of form and function. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society: The information age: Economy, society and culture (Volume-1). New-Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, C. (2008). Planning for sustainable accessibility: The implementation challenge. Transport Policy, 15(2), 104–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delhi Development Authority. (2005). Master plan for Delhi 2021. New Delhi: Delhi Development Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitriou, H. T. (2006). Towards a generic sustainable urban transport strategy for middle-sized cities in Asia: Lessons from Ningbo. Kanpur and Solo. Habitat International, 30(4), 1082–1099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diwan, A., (2009). Planning for social infrastructure through accessibility for the city of Surat. Unpublished M. Plan Thesis, CEPT University Ahmedabad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geurs, K. T., & van Wee, B. (2006). Ex-post evaluation of thirty years of compact urban development in the Netherlands. Urban Studies, 43(1), 139–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilhamdaniah, Munshi, T., & Amer, S. (2005). Evaluating the planning of social infrastructures in Ahmedabad, India. In Computers in Urban Planning and Urban Management (CUPUM) 2005 Conference (pp. 1–11). London: University College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, R., Shah, K., Joseph, Y., Munshi, T., & Mahadevia, D. (2013). A case for local accessibility planning in Indian cities. Ahmedabad: Centre for Urban Equity, CEPT University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korsu, E., & Wenglenski, S. (2010). Job accessibility, residential segregation and risk of long-term unemployment in the Paris region. Urban Studies, 47(11), 2279–2324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lama-Rewal, S.T. (2007). Neighbourhood associations and local democracy: Delhi municipal elections 2007. Economic & Political Weekly, XLII(47), 51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahadevia, D., Munshi, T., Joshi, R., Shah, K., Joseph, Y., & Advani, D. (2014a). A methodology for local accessibility planning in Indian cities. Ahmedabad: Centre for Urban Equity, CEPT University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahadevia, D., Bhatia, N., & Bhatt, B. (2014b). Resident welfare associations (RWAs) in BSUP sites of Ahmedabad: Experiences of mahila housing SEWA trust. Ahmedabad: Centre for Urban Equity, CEPT University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matas, A., Raymond, J.-L., & Roig, J.-L. (2010). Job accessibility and female employment probability: The cases of Barcelona and Madrid. Urban Studies, 47(4), 769–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuo, M. (2011). US metropolitan spatial structure and labour accessibility. Urban Studies, 48(11), 2283–2302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Urban Affairs and Employment. (1996). Urban Development Plans Formulation and Implementation (UDPFI) Guidelines, New Delhi: Centre for Research, Documentation & Training—Institute of Town Planners, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Urban Development (2014a). Urban and regional development plan formulation and implementation (URDPFI) Guidelines (Vol. I). New Delhi: Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Urban Development. (2014b). Urban and regional development plan formulation and implementation (URDPFI) guidelines (Vols. II (A) and II (B)). New Delhi: Ministry of Urban Development, Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munshi, T. (2016). Built environment and mode choice relationship for commute travel in the City of Rajkot, India. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 44, 239–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munshi, T., Joshi, R., Adhvaryu, B., Shah, K., Joseph, Y., Christian, P., et al. (2015). Landuse transport integration for sustainable urbanism: Inputs for the development planning process. Ahmedabad [Forthcoming]: Centre for Urban Land Policy, CEPT University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munshi, T., Zuidgeest, M., Brussel, M., & van Maarseveen, M. (2014). Logistic regression and cellular automata-based modelling of retail, commercial and residential development in the city of Ahmedabad, India. Cities, 39, 68–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nath, V. (2007). Urbanization, urban development, and metropolitan cities in India. New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, S. (2001). Measuring the accessibility and equity of public parks: A case study using GIS. Managing Leisure, 6(4), 201–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Registrar General of India. (2011). Census of India: Population Enumeration Data (Final Population). Retrieved February 9, 2014, from http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011census/population_enumeration.aspx

  • Rudlin, D., & Falk, N. (2009). Sustainable urban neighbourhood: Building the 21st century home. Burlington: Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stantchev, D., & Merat, N. (2010). Equity and accessibility: thematic research summary. Delft: Transport Research Knowledge Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talen, E., & Anselin, L. (1998). Assessing spatial equity: An evaluation of measures of accessibility to public playgrounds. Environment and Planning A, 30(4), 595–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Talat Munshi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer India

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Munshi, T., Zia-ul-Haque, Joseph, Y. (2017). Examining Equity in Spatial Distribution of Recreational and Social Infrastructure in Delhi. In: Acharya, S., Sen, S., Punia, M., Reddy, S. (eds) Marginalization in Globalizing Delhi: Issues of Land, Livelihoods and Health. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3583-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3583-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi

  • Print ISBN: 978-81-322-3581-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-81-322-3583-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics