Abstract
This chapter looks into opportunity identification/recognition in the process of social value creation. Opportunity recognition emerged as a process rather than a one-time action, which in turn involved a series of actions. Considering the fact that the contextual factors play an important role in the process of social value creation, this chapter explores the values and beliefs of the social entrepreneurs, and their different contextual backgrounds. Then, it explores the influence of these contextual differences on identifying/recognising opportunities by social entrepreneurs. The cases showed that social entrepreneurs identified opportunities in different ways, yet many similar patterns emerged out of the cross-case analysis. Based on the findings, two propositions have been developed, and finally, opportunity recognition in social entrepreneurship has been presented in a figure. The study showed that social entrepreneurs pursued opportunities to achieve their social mission, that is, to solve social problems and create social value. The cases showed that opportunity recognition/identification and exploitation involved a series of actions. Hence, it emerged as a process rather than a one-time action. Considering the fact that the contextual factors play a very important role in the process of social value creation, this chapter focuses on the values and beliefs of social entrepreneurs, the different contextual backgrounds (their family and social backgrounds, relationships, educational and professional backgrounds, work experiences and past experiences). Then, it explores the influence of these contextual differences on identifying/recognising opportunities by social entrepreneurs. The cases showed that social entrepreneurs identified opportunities in different ways, yet many similar patterns emerged out of cross-case analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Notes
- 1.
Here, ‘social value’ is used in the context of the founders’ inculcated values towards society, not in the context of value creation for the beneficiaries.
- 2.
Bihar is one of the poorest and backward states of India. A large number of people of Bihar (Biharis) migrate to other states in search of livelihood. A large majority of these Bihari migrants are illiterate and employed in other states for performing unskilled tasks labourers, such as rickshaw pulling. Indians, in general, do not treat the natives of Bihar with respect and often abuse them.
References
Alter SK (2006) Social enterprise models and their mission and money relationships. In: Nicholls A (ed) Social entrepreneurship: new models of sustainable change. Oxford, New York, pp 205–232
Alvarez S, Barney JB (2007) Discovery and creation: alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strat Entrep J 1(1):11–26
Alvarez SA, Barney JB, Young SL (2010) Debates in entrepreneurship: opportunity formation and implications for the field of entrepreneurship. In: Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB (eds) Handbook of entrepreneurship research: international handbook series on entrepreneurship 5. Springer, LLC, pp 23–45. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1191-9_2
Austin JA, Stevenson H, Wei-Skillern J (2006) Social and commercial entrepreneurship: same, different, or both? Entrep Theory Pract 30(1):1–22
Bandura A (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall, NJ
Becker G (1993) Human capital: a theoretical and empirical analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Cope J (2005) Toward a dynamic learning perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrep Theory Pract 29:373–397
Corbett AC (2005) Experiential learning with the process of opportunity identification and exploitation. Entrep Theory Pract 29:473–491
Corner PD, Ho M (2010) How opportunities develop in social entrepreneurship. Entrep Theory Pract 34(4):635–659
Davidsson P, Honig B (2003) The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. J Bus Ventur 18:301–331
Dees JG (1998) The meaning of social entrepreneurship. http://www.fntc.info/files/documents/The%20meaning%20of%20Social%20Entreneurship.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2008
Dees JG (2007) Taking social entrepreneurship seriously. Society 44(3):24–31
DeTienne DR, Chandler GN (2007) The role of gender in opportunity identification. Entrep Theory Pract 31(3):365–386
Dew N, Sarasvathy SD (2007) Innovations, stakeholders and entrepreneurship. J Bus Ethics 74(3):267–283
Dimov D (2007) From opportunity insight to opportunity intention: the importance of person-situation learning match. Entrep Theory Pract 31(4):561–583. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00188.x
Dimov D, Shepard D (2005) Human capital theory and venture capital firms: exploring “home runs” and “strike outs”. J Bus Ventur 20:1–21
Dorado S (2006) Social entrepreneurial ventures: different values so different process of creation, no? J Dev Entrep 11(4):319–343
Elkington J, Hartigan P (2008) The power of unreasonable people: how social entrepreneurs create markets that change the world. Harvard Business Press, Boston
Farmer SM, Yao X, Kung-Mcintyre K (2011) The behavioural impact of entrepreneur identity, aspiration and prior entrepreneurial experience. Entrep Theory Pract 35(2):245–273
Gartner WB (1988) “Who is an entrepreneur?” is the wrong question. Entrep Theory Pract 13(4):47–68
Giddens A (1979) Central problems in social theory. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA
Giddens A (1984) The constitution of society. Polity Press, Cambridge
Hill TL, Kothari TH, Shea M (2010) Patterns of meaning in the social entrepreneurship literature: a research platform. J Social Entrep 1(1):5–31
Hockerts K (2006) Entrepreneurial opportunity in social purpose ventures. In: Mair J, Robinson J, Hockerts K (eds) Handbook of research in social entrepreneurship. Palgrave, London, pp 142–154
Jones R, Latham J, Betta M (2008) Narrative construction of the social entrepreneurial identity. Int J Entrep Behav Res 14(5):330–345
Kirzner IM (1997) Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: an Austrian approach. J Econ Lit 35(1):60–85
Kistruck GM, Beamish PW (2010) The interplay of form, structure, and embeddedness in social intrapreneurship. Entrep Theory Pract 735–761. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00371.x
Kwon S-W, Arenius P (2010) Nations of entrepreneurs: a social capital perspective. J Bus Ventur 25:315–330. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.10.008
Lehner OM, Kansikas J (2012) Opportunity recognition in social entrepreneurship: a thematic meta analysis. J Entrep 21(1):25–58
Lin N (2001) Social capital: a theory of social structure and action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
Madsen H, Neergaard H, Ulhøi JP (2003) Knowledge-intensive entrepreneurship and human capital. J Small Bus Enterp Dev 10(4):426–434
Maguire S, Hardy C, Lawrence TB (2004) Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Acad Manag J 47:657–680
Mair J, Marti I (2006) Social entrepreneurship research: a source of explanation, prediction and delight. J World Bus 41:36–44
Meek WR, Pacheco DF, York JF (2010) The impact of social norms on entrepreneurial action: evidence from the environmental entrepreneurship context. J Bus Ventur 25:493–509
Morris MH, Kuratko DF, Schindehutte M et al (2012) Framing the entrepreneurial experience. Entrep Theory Pract 36(1):11–40
Mort GS, Weerawardena J, Carnegie K (2003) Social entrepreneurship: towards conceptualisation. Int J Nonprofit Volunt Sector Mark 8(1):76–88
Neck H, Brush C, Allen E (2008) The landscape of social entrepreneurship. Bus Horiz 52:13–19
Nicholls A, Cho AH (2006) Social entrepreneurship: the structuration of a field. In: Nicholls A (ed) Social entrepreneurship: new models of sustainable change. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 99–118
Patzelt H, Shepherd DA (2010) Recognizing opportunities for sustainable development. Entrep Theory Pract 631–652. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00386.x
Peredo A, McLean M (2006) Social entrepreneurship: a critical review of the concept. J World Bus 41:56–65
Ramos-Rodríguez AR, Ramos-Rodríguez JA, Lorenzo-Gómez JD et al (2010) What you know or who you know? The role of intellectual and social capital in opportunity recognition. Int Small Bus J 28(6):566–582
Roberts E (1991) Entrepreneurs in high technology: lessons from MIT and beyond. Oxford University Press, New York
Sarason Y, Dean T, Dillard JF (2006) Entrepreneurship as the nexus of individual and opportunity: a structuration view. J Bus Ventur 21:286–305
Sarasvathy SD (2001) Causation and effectuation: toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Acad Manag Rev 26(2):243–263
Seelos C, Mair J (2005) Sustainable development: how social entrepreneurs make it happen. Working Paper No. 611, IESE Business School, University of Navarra, Spain. http://www.iese.edu/research/pdfs/DI-0611-E.pdf. Accessed 19 July 2011
Sengupta A (2009) Social capital and business venture: entrepreneurship in the ICT industry. A dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy in social sciences, Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS), Mumbai
Shane S (2000) Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organ Sci 11(4):448–469
Smith ML (2006) Social capital and intentional change: exploring the role of social networks on individual change efforts. J Manag Dev 25(7):718–731
Thompson J (2002) The world of the social entrepreneur. Int J Public Sector Manag 15(5):412–431
Urbano D, Toledano N, Soriano DR (2010) Analysing social entrepreneurship from an institutional perspective: evidence from Spain. J Social Entrep 1(1):54–69
Venkatarman S (1997) The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: an editor’s perspective. In: Katz J, Brockhaus R (eds) Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence, and growth. CT, JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 119–138
Weerawardena J, Mort G (2006) Investigating social entrepreneurship: a multi-dimensional model. J World Bus 41:21–35
Welter F (2011) Contextualizing entrepreneurship-conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrep Theory Pract 35(1):165–184
Westhead P, Ucbasaran D, Wright M (2009) Information search and opportunity identification: the importance of prior business ownership experience. Int Small Bus J 27(6):659–680
Yiu DW, Wan WP, Ng FW et al (2014) Sentimental drivers of social entrepreneurship: a study of China’s Guangcai (Glorious) Program. Manag Organ Rev 10(1):55–80
Zahra SA (2008) The virtuous cycle of discovery and creation of entrepreneurial opportunities. Strat Entrep J 2:243–257
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Singh, A. (2016). Opportunity Recognition/Identification. In: The Process of Social Value Creation. Contributions to Economics. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2827-1_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2827-1_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2825-7
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2827-1
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)