Abstract
This paper aim to conduct a pilot study in India process industry for sustainable machining process design. A survey questionnaire was framed at five point likert type scale. Respondents were asked to five elements related to sustainable machining process design (SMPD) Fifty responses was collected from various process industries. Simple statistics mean, standard deviation, correlation and t test is applied for the analyse survey responses. It is evident that the Energy efficiency during the process, Vegetable based cutting fluid and machining process utilisation are more emphasised by the companies and the other factors like Waste minimization and cryogenic machining require more focused on it. One sample t test it is evident that Energy efficiency during the process (SMPD5) (t = 6.194) is the most important factor which is highly adopted by the process industry in practice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Belluco, W., & De Chiffre, L. (2002). Surface integrity and part accuracy in reaming and tapping stainless steel with new vegetable based cutting oils. Tibology International, 35(12), 865–870.
Belluco, W., & De Chiffre, L. (2004). Performance evaluation of vegetable-based oils in drilling austenitic stainless steel. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 148(2), 171–176.
Gupta, S., Dangayach, G. S., & Singh, A. K. (2015a) Key determinants of sustainable product design and manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, 26, 99–102.
Gupta, S., Dangayach, G. S., Singh, A. K., & Rao, P. N. (2015b) Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Model for Evaluating Sustainable Manufacturing Practices in Indian Electrical Panel Industries. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 189, 208–216.
Khan, M. M. A., & Dhar, N. R. (2006). Performance evaluation of minimum quantity lubrication by vegetable oil in terms of cutting force, cutting zone temperature, tool wear, job dimension and surface finish in turning AISI-1060 steel. Journal of Zhejiang University: Science, 7, 11.
Konopka, J., & Trybula, W. (1996) Overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) and cost measurement semiconductor manufacturing. In Nineteenth IEEE/CPMT Electronics Manufacturing Technology Symposium, pp. 137–140.
Maleque, M. A., Masjuki, H. H., & Supuan, S. M. (2003). Vegetable-based biodegradable lubricating oil additives. Industrial lubrication and Tribology, 55, 137–143.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Quintana, G., & Ciurana, J. (2011). Chatter in machining processes: A review. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 51, 363–376.
Srinivasan, M., & Sheng, P. (1999). Feature-based process planning for environmentally conscious machining Part1: Micro planning. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 15.
Yildiz, Y., & Nalbant, M. (2008). A review of cryogenic cooling in machining processes. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 48(9), 947–964.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gupta, S., Dangayach, G.S., Singh, A.K., Rao, P.N. (2016). A Pilot Study of Sustainable Machining Process Design in Indian Process Industry. In: Mandal, D.K., Syan, C.S. (eds) CAD/CAM, Robotics and Factories of the Future. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2740-3_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2740-3_36
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2738-0
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2740-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)