Skip to main content

A Method of Defining Paraconsistent Tableaus

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
New Directions in Paraconsistent Logic

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics ((PROMS,volume 152))

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to show how to simply define paraconsistent tableau systems by liberalization of construction of complete tableaus. The presented notions allow us to list all tableau inconsistencies that appear in a complete tableau. Then we can easily choose these inconsistencies that are effects of interactions between premises and a conclusion, simultaneously excluding other inconsistencies. A general technique we describe is presented here for the case of Propositional Logic, as the simplest one, but it can be easily extended to more complex cases. In other words, a kind of paraconsistent consequence relation is being studied here, and a simple tableau system is shown to exist that captures that consequence relation.

This work was completed with the support of Polish National Center of Science NCN UMO-2012/05/E/HS1/03542.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We use a word inconsistent instead—for example—contradictory, since it enables us a direct transition between semantical and tableau notions.

  2. 2.

    We mean such logics that are logics of terms or propositions, and are two–valued.

  3. 3.

    The rules modified a little in a manner that is good for our paraconsistent aim are presented in the Sect. 14.3.

  4. 4.

    Generally, we divide complete branches into open and closed ones, since in our formal theory of tableau methods in [2] our aim is always to complete a branch, so a branch itself is just a technical concept. At the same time an occurrence of a t-inconsistency completes a branch. In the paper we change our point of view a bit: applying of rules is allowed as far as it is possible, ignoring any t-inconsistency—later we will come back to the idea, when explaining exactly what we mean by ‘blind rules’ (exactly in the Sect. 14.3).

References

  1. Priest, G.: An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jarmużek, T.: Formalizacja metod tablicowych dla logik zdań i logik nazw (Formalization of tableau methods for propositional logics and for logics of names). Wydawnictwo UMK, Toruń (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jarmużek, T.: Tableau Metatheorem for Modal Logics. In: Ciuni, R., Wansing, H., Willkommen, C. (eds.) Recent Trends in Philosophical Logic, pp. 105–123. Springer (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to an anonymous reviewer for helpful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomasz Jarmużek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer India

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jarmużek, T., Tkaczyk, M. (2015). A Method of Defining Paraconsistent Tableaus. In: Beziau, JY., Chakraborty, M., Dutta, S. (eds) New Directions in Paraconsistent Logic. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 152. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2719-9_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics