Abstract
This chapter presents a framework for understanding the factors responsible for collective violence. Structural conditions that serve as a predisposition to violence include poverty, economic and social stratification , racial inequality, strong authoritarian hierarchy, control by violence, and limited political opportunity. However, unless people are motivated to indulge in such acts, violence does not take place. Violence is also shaped by group characteristics: crowds can lead to de-individuation , which makes people less accountable; and groups seeking positive identity may become prejudiced against the outgroup. Competition for certain resources may create grounds for conflict between groups as well. Asymmetric power relations are a cause of backlash among groups. Individual characteristics such as locus of control , political efficacy , individualist/collectivist orientation , and social domination orientation provide some information about involvement in collective violence; but none of these factors alone is a strong predictor. Relative deprivation at the individual level or group level may also cause people to aggress towards others. The chapter ends by providing future directions for research, including the need to include both cross-level and single level explanations and the need to account for nesting of individuals within groups and groups within societal structures.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andrews, M. (1991). Lifetimes of commitment: Aging, politics, psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ansari, M. J. (1981). Fraternalistic relative deprivation and styles of conflict resolution. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Allahabad, Allahabad.
Barkan, S. E., & Snowden, L. L. (2001). Collective violence Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Bourhis, R. Y., Sachdev, I., & Gagnon, A. (1994). Intergroup research with the Tajfel matrices: Methodological notes. In M.P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The psychology of prejudice: The Ontario symposium, (Vo. 7, pp. 209–232). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Brewer, M. B. (1979). In group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307–324.
Brown, R. (1965). Social psychology. New York: Free Press.
Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (Vol. I). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3, 14–25.
Crocker, J., Major, B., & Steele, C. (1998). Social stigma. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 504–553). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Crosby, F. (1976). A model of egoistical relative deprivation. Psychological Review, 83, 85–113.
Eidelson, R. J., & Eidelson, J. I. (2003). Dangerous ideas: Five beliefs that propel groups toward conflict. American Psychologist, 58, 182–192.
Engineer, A. A. (1984). The causes of communal riots in the post-partition period in India. In A. A. Engineer (Ed.), Communal riots in post-independence India (pp. 33–41). Hyderabad: Sangam Books.
Folger, R., Rosenfield, D. D., & Robinson, T. (1983). Relative deprivation and procedural justifications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 268–273.
Ghosh, E. S. K., Kumar, R., & Tripathi, R. C. (1992). The communal cauldron: Relations between Hindus and Muslims in India and their reactions to norm violations. In R. DeRidder & R.C. Tripathi (Eds.), Norm violation and intergroup relations (pp. 70–89). Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press.
Grimshaw, A. D. (1970). Interpreting collective violence: An argument for the importance of social structure. In J. F. Short Jr & M. E. Wolfgang (Eds.), Collective violence (pp. 35–46). Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
Herek, G. M. (2000). The psychology of sexual prejudice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9, 19–22.
Hinkle, S. W., & Brown, R. J. (1990). Intergroup comparisons and social identity: Some links and lacunae. In D. Abrams & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Social identity theory: Constructive and critical advances (pp. 48–70). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Islam, M. R., & Hewstone, M. (1993). Dimensions of contact as predictors of intergroup anxiety, perceived out-group variability, and out-group attitude: An integrative model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 700–710.
Kelly, C., & Breinlinger, S. (1996). The social psychology of collective action: Identity, injustice and gender. London: Taylor & Francis.
Klandermans, P. G. (1983). Rotter-s IE-scale and socio-political action taking: The balance of 20 years of research. European Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 399–415.
Kumar, R. (1999). Intergroup relations among Hindus, Muslims, and Christians: Some perceptions. Paper Presented at the Convention of NAOP, University of Lucknow.
LeBon, G. (1895/1960). The crowd. New York: Viking.
Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York: Plenum.
Lickel, B., Schmader, T., & Hamilton, D. L. (2003). A Case of collective responsibility: Who else was to blame for the Columbine High School Shootings? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 194–204.
Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.
McAdam, D., McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1988). Social movements. In N. J. Smelser (Ed.), Handbook of sociology (pp. 695–737). Newbury Park, C.A.: Sage.
McDougal, W. (1921). Introduction to social psychology. London: Methuen.
McPhail, C. (1971). Civil disorder participation: A critical examination of recent research. American Sociological Review, 36, 1058–1073.
Murphy, G. (1953). In the minds of men: The study of human behavior and social tensions in India. New York: Basic Books.
Naqvi, N. (1980). Relative deprivation and attribution of blame in communal riots. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Allahabad, Allahabad.
Pettigrew, T. F. (1979). The ultimate attribution error: Extending Allport’s cognitive analysis of prejudice. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 461–476.
Plant, E. A., & Devine, P. G. (2003). The antecedents and implications of interracial anxiety. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 790–801.
Ruback, R. B., & Singh, P. (2007). Ingroup bias, intergroup contact, and the attribution of blame for riots. Psychology and Developing Societies, 19, 249–265.
Ruback, R. B., & Singh, P. (2008). Inequity in Hindu-Muslim riots: A test of two biases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4, 982–998.
Rule, J. (1988). Theories of civil violence. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Runciman, W. G. (1966). Relative deprivation and social justice. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Saxena, N. C. (1984). The nature and origin of communal riots in India. In A. A. Engineer (Ed.), Communal riots in post-independence India (pp. 51–67). Hyderabad: Sangam Books.
Sears, D. O., & Tomlinson, T. M. (1971). Riot ideology in Los Angeles: A study of Negro attitudes. In J.A. Geschwender (Ed.), The black revolt: The civil rights movement, ghetto uprisings, and separatism (pp. 375–388). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Sherif, M. (1966). The psychology of social norms. Oxford, England: Harper Torchbooks.
Sherif, M., Harvey, O. J., While, B. J., Hood, W. R., & Sherif, C. W. (1961). Intergroup conflict and cooperation: The Robbers Cave experiment. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Book Exchange.
Sidanium, J. (1993). The psychology of group conflict and the dynamics of oppression. In S. Iyengar & W. J. McGuire (Eds.), Explorations in Political psychology (pp. 183–219). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Singh, A. K. (1988). Intergroup relations and social tensions. In J. Pandey, (Ed.), Psychology in India: The state of the art (vol. 2, pp. 159–223). New Delhi: Sage.
Smelser, N. J. (1963). Theory of collective behavior. New York: Free Press.
Smith, P. B., & Bond, M. H. (1993). Social psychology across cultures: Analysis and perspectives. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Staub, E. (1989). The roots of evil: The origins of genocide and other group violence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Staub, E. (1999). Predicting collective violence: The psychological and cultural roots of turning against others. In C. Summers & Markusen (Eds.) Collective violence: Harmful behavior in groups and governments (pp. 196–209). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (1985). Intergroup anxiety. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 157–175.
Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. Oxford, England: Academic press.
Taylor, D. M., & Jaggi, V. (1974). Ethnocentrism and causal attribution in a South Indian context. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 5, 162–171.
Taylor, D. M., & McKirnan, D. J. (1984). Theoretical contributions: A five-stage model of intergroup relations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 291–300.
Tilly, C., Tilly, L., & Tilly, R. (1975). The rebellious century, 1830–1930. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Triandis, H. C., Bontempo, R., Villareal, M. J., Asai, M., & Lucca, N. (1988). Individualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self–in-group relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 323–338.
Tripathi, R. C., & Srivastava, R. (1981). Relative deprivation and intergroup attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 313–318.
Zimbardo, P. J. (1969). The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order versus deindividuation impulse, and chaos. In W. G. Arnold & D. Levine (Eds.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 17, pp. 237–307). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ruback, R.B., Singh, P. (2016). Group and Individual Level Determinants of Collective Violence: Socio-psychological Aspects of Hindu-Muslim Riots. In: Tripathi, R., Singh, P. (eds) Perspectives on Violence and Othering in India. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2613-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2613-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2612-3
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2613-0
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)