Advertisement

Between Revenge and Reconciliation: The Significance of Truth Commissions

Chapter

Abstract

The author, in this chapter, highlights the episode when Gandhi decided to live with a Muslim league leader post the communal riots of Calcutta in 1946, in order to bring about lasting peace. However, such an intervention may not always be possible in a society devoid of a Mahatma, nonetheless peace can be brought about by establishing a truth commission. According to the author, basic procedural justice makes possible a minimally decent life, which has a value independent of any wider conception of the good. In order to transform a barbaric society into a decent society, it is important to transit through certain stages. First, a highly frail and temporary truce prevails that may easily collapse generating a fresh burst of violence. With the help from appropriate institutions, such as the truth commissions, we move to stage two, to a minimally decent society. A sufficiently prolonged period of minimal decency may eventually create facilitating conditions for stage three, for forgiveness and reconciliation, and therefore, to a fully decent society. In order to break the cycle of revenge, former victims must be inducted into a system of basic procedural justice equipped with a mechanism of arbitration, Truth commission can help in the recovery of the submerged voice of the victim. It is important also for the brutalities to be spoken about rather than expect victims to forgive and forget since only an appropriate engagement with the past makes for a livable common future.

Keywords

Reconciliation Peace Justice Procedural justice Barbarism 

References

  1. Bhalla, A. (1994). Stories about partition of India. New Delhi: Indus.Google Scholar
  2. Bhargava, R. (1992). Individualism in social science. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  3. Dalton, D. (1970). Gandhi during partition: A case study in the nature of Satyagraha. In C.H. Phillips & Mary Wainright (Eds.), The partition of India: policies and perspectives 1935–1947. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  4. Das, V. (1990). Our work to cry: Your work to listen. In V. Das (Ed.), Mirrors of violence. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Gandhi, M. K. (1982). Collected works of Mahatma Gandhi (Vol. CXXXVI). New Delhi: Publications Division.Google Scholar
  6. Hampshire, S. (1989). Innocence and experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Hume, D. (1994). Political writings. Cambridge/Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  8. Ignatieff, M. (1994). Blood and belonging. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  9. Mackie, J. (1985). Persons and values. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  10. Mamdani, M. (1996). Reconciliation without Justice. South African Review of Books CIV.Google Scholar
  11. May, L. (1992). Sharing responsibility. Chicago and London: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Murphy, J., & Hampton, J. (1990). Forgiveness and mercy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Rosenburg, T. (1995). The haunted land. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  14. Waldron, J. (1992). Superseding historic injustice. Ethics, 103:4–28.Google Scholar
  15. Walzer, M. (1994). Thick and thin: Moral argument at home and abroad. London and Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Wolin, S. (1989). The presence of the past. Baltimore and London: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Parekh Institute of Indian ThoughtDelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations