Advertisement

Automated Segmentation Scheme Based on Probabilistic Method and Active Contour Model for Breast Cancer Detection

  • Biswajit Biswas
  • Ritamshirsa Choudhuri
  • Kashi Nath Dey
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 43)

Abstract

Mammography is one of the renowned techniques for detection of breast cancer in medical domain. The detection rate and accuracy of breast cancer in mammogram depend on the accuracy of image segmentation and the quality of mammogram images. Most of existing mammogram detection techniques suffer from exact continuous boundary detection and estimate amount of affected area. We propose an algorithm for the detection of deformities in mammographic images that using Gaussian probabilistic approach with Maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), statistical measures for the classify of image region, post processing by morphological operations and Freeman Chain Codes for contour detection. For these detected areas of abnormalities, compactness are evaluated on segmented mammographic images. The validation of the proposed method is established by using mammogram images from different databases. From experimental results of the proposed method we can claim the superiority over other usual methods.

Keywords

Mammographic images Segmentation Breast cancer 

References

  1. 1.
    W. Xu, S. Xia, et al., A Model based Algorithm for Mass Segmentation in Mammograms, IEEE, pp. 2543 – 2546 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cheng, H.D., Shi, X.J., Min, R., Hu, L.M., Cai, X.P., Du, H.N.: Approaches for automated detection and classification of masses in mammograms. Pattern Recogn. 39(4), 646–668 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mudigonda, N.R., Rangayyan, R.M., Desautels, J.E.L.: Segmentation and classification of mammographic masses. SPIE Med. Imag. Image Process. 3979, 55–67 (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    te Brake, G.M., Karssemeijer, N.: Single and multiscale detection of masses in digital mammograms. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 18, 628–639 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kass, M., Witkin, A., Terzopoulos, D.: Snakes: active contour models. Int. J. Comput. Vision 1(4), 321–331 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xu, C., Yezzi, A., Prince, J.: On the relationship between parametric and geometric active contours. Proc. Asilomar Conf. Sig. Syst. Comput. 1, 483–489 (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vese, L.A., Chan, T.F.: A multiphase level set framework for image segmentation using the Mumford and Shah model. Int. J. Comput. Vision 50(3), 271–293 (2002)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brox, T., Weickert, J.: Level set based image segmentation with multiple regions. Pattern Recognit. Springer LNCS 3175, 415–423 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen, W., Giger, M.L., Bick, U.: A fuzzy c-means (FCM)-based approach for computerized segmentation of breast lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images. Acad. Radiol. 13(1), 63–72 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li, H.D., Kallergi, M., Clarke, L.P., Jain, V.K., Clark, R.A.: Markov random field for tumor detection in digital mammography. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 14, 565–576 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shi, J., Malik, J.: Normalized cuts and image segmentation. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 22(8), 888–905 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fieguth, P.: Statistical image processing and multidimensional modeling. In: Information Science and Statistics. Springer, New York (2011). ISBN:978-1-4419-7293-4Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hamarneh, G., Li, X.: Watershed segmentation using prior shape and appearance knowledge. Image Vis. Comput. 27, 59–68 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lezoray, O., Cardot, H.: Cooperation of color pixel classification schemes and color watershed: a study for microscopic images. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 11(7), 783–789 (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nixon, M.S., AguadoFeature, A.S.: Extraction and Image Processing. British Library, UK (2002). ISBN:0-7506-5078-8Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Burger, W., Burge, M.J.: Principles of Digital Image Processing Core Algorithms. Springer, London (2009). ISSN:1863-7310Google Scholar
  17. 17.

Copyright information

© Springer India 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Biswajit Biswas
    • 1
  • Ritamshirsa Choudhuri
    • 1
  • Kashi Nath Dey
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringUniversity of CalcuttaKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations