Fuzzy Based Analysis of Energy Efficient Protocols in Heterogeneous Wireless Sensor Networks

Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 44)

Abstract

Recent technological advances in wireless sensor network (WSN) lead to many new applications where energy awareness consideration is essential. There are some constrained to use wireless sensor network like energy, environmental effect like temperature, pressure, sound. To overcome these issues many new protocols are developed where energy awareness consideration is important. Most of the work reputed deals with modification, design, development of new routing protocols; which works for different applications of wireless network architectures. This paper analyzes the energy efficient operation in wireless sensor nodes. For this purpose, Low Energy Adaptive Clustering Hierarchy (LEACH), Hierarchical Cluster based Routing (HCR), Stable Election Protocol (SEP) and Gateway Cluster Head Election–Fuzzy Logic (GCHE-FL) protocols were analyze and compare. Clustering algorithm has been used because it reduces the energy of the sensor network. In the present work, Fuzzy logic with three input parameters and single output parameter; is used in cluster head election and protocol gateway heterogeneous wireless sensor network. It has been observed that in GCHE-FL the sensor node being alive for much more time as compare to LEACH, SEP, HCR.

Keywords

Fuzzy logic Gateway Cluster head Energy Wireless sensor network area 

References

  1. 1.
    Akyildiz, I.F., Su, W., Sankarasubramaniam, Y., Cayirci E.: A survey on sensor networks. IEEE Commun. Mag. 102–114 (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chong, C.Y., Kumar, S.P.: Sensor networks: evolution opportunities, and challenges. Proc. IEEE 91(8), 1247–1256 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Haenggi, M.: Handbook of Sensor Networks: Compact Wireless and Wired Sensing Systems, (Chapter 1 Opportunities and Challenges in Wireless Sensor Networks, 1–11). CRC Press (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Estrin, D., Girod, L., Pottie, G., Srivastava, M.: Instrumenting the world with wire-less sensor networks. In: International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP 2001), pp. 2033–2036 (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Heinzelman, W.R., Chandrakasan, A.P., Balakrishnan, H.: An application-specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. 1(4), 660–670 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ben Alla, S., Ezzati, A., Beni Hssane, A., Hasnaoui, M.L.: Improved and Balanced LEACH for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Eng. 2(8), 2633–2640 (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Qing, L., Zhu, Q., Wang, M.: Design of a distributed energy efficient clustering algorithm for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Elsevier, Comput. Commun. 29, 2230–2237 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gupta, I., Riordanand, D., Sampalli, S.: Cluster-head election uses fuzzy logic for wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Communication Networks and Services Research Conference, pp. 255–260, May 2005Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Smaragdakis, G., Malta, I., Bestavros, A.: A stable election protocol for clustered heterogenous wireless sensor network. In: Second International Workshop on Sensor and Actor Network Protocols and Applications (SANPA 2004) (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tashtoush, Y.M., Okour, M.A.: Fuzzy self-clustering for wireless sensor network. In: IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Daliri, Z., et al.: Railway security through the use of wireless sensor networks based on fuzzy logic. Int. J. Phys. Sci. 6(3), 448–458 (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Heinzelman, W.R., Chandrakasan, A., Balakrishnan, H.: Energy efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In: Proceedings of the Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, January 2000Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Attea B.A., Khalil E.A.: A new evolutionary based routing protocol for clustered heterogeneous wireless sensor network. Elsevier, App. Soft Comput. 12, 1950–1957 (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hussain, S., Matin, A.W.: Hierarchical cluster-based routing in wireless sensor networks. IEEE/ACM International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN) Work-in-progress track, IEEE Computer Society, Nashville, TN, 19–21 April 2006Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Electronics and Communication Discipline, DPTIndian Institute of TechnologyRoorkeeIndia

Personalised recommendations