Advertisement

Intelligent Telecommunication System Using Semantic-Based Information Retrieval

  • E. Ajith Jubilson
  • P. Dhanavanthini
  • P. Victer Paul
  • V. Pravinpathi
  • M. RamCoumare
  • S. Paranidharan
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 381)

Abstract

Artificial intelligence refers to the ability by which a system studies human ideas and applies them in computerized machines. One of the advantages of a speech recognition system is to simultaneously convert the user’s voice into text. The current telephony system provides a feature of recording a voice call, but it has no processing capability to analyze a phone call. In our project, we introduce an intelligent agent into the telephony system. An unattended phone call is recorded and a recognizer converts the analog signal into a digital signal for speech processing. The analyzer consists of a database which holds some important preprocessed keywords and the intelligent agent can formulate the state of the situation. In case of urgency, the message is examined by the parser to identify the time of the incident and the sentiment analyzer has been used to avoid prank calls. Thus, an epistle would be sent to the user in case of exigency or the voice message is stored by default method.

Keywords

Ontology Semantic analyzer Speech processing Key word matching 

References

  1. 1.
    Salton, G.M., Wong, A.K.C., Yang, C.-S.: A vector space model for automatic indexing. Information Retrieval and Language Processing. Commun. ACM 18(11), 613–620 (1975)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gonzalo, J., Verdejo, F., Chugur, I., Cigarrin, J.: Indexing with wordnet synsets can improve text retrieval. Comput. Res. Repos. 98, 38–44 (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mihalcea, R., Moldovan, D.: Semantic indexing using wordnet senses. In: Proceedings of the ACL-2000 Workshop on Recent advances in Natural Language Processing and Information Retrieval, Association for Computational Linguistics, Morristown, pp. 35–45 (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Habernal, I., Konopík, M.: SWSNL: semantic web search using natural language. Expert Syst. Appl. 40(9), 3649–3664 (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Al-Jadir, L., Parent, C., Spaccapretra, S.: Reasoning with large ontologies stored in relational databases: the OntoMinD approach. Inf. Syst. Inst. Elsevier 69, 1158–1180 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lopez, V., Fernández, M., Motta, E., Stieler, N.: PowerAqua: Supporting users in querying and exploring the Semantic Web. Semant. Web 3(3), 2210–4968 (2012). doi: 10.3233/SW-2011-0030,249-265. (IOS Press)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cimiano, P., Haase, P., Heizmann, J., Mantel, M,. Studer, R.: Towards Portable natural language interfaces to knowledge bases—the case of the ORAKEL system. Data Knowl. Eng. (DKE) 65(2), 325–354 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Ajith Jubilson
    • 1
  • P. Dhanavanthini
    • 2
  • P. Victer Paul
    • 2
  • V. Pravinpathi
    • 2
  • M. RamCoumare
    • 2
  • S. Paranidharan
    • 2
  1. 1.RMD Engineering CollegeChennaiIndia
  2. 2.Sri Manakula Vinayagar Engineering CollegePuducherryIndia

Personalised recommendations