Advertisement

Hybrid Recommender System with Conceptualization and Temporal Preferences

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 380)

Abstract

From the last couple of decades, the web services on the Internet changed the perspectives of the usage of a normal user as well as the vendor. Recommender systems are the intelligent agents that provide suggestions regarding the navigation in the web site for a user, based on preferences mentioned by the user in the past usage. Although there were several hybrid recommenders available with content-based and collaborative strategies, they were unable to process semantics about temporal and conceptual aspects. This paper incorporates the domain knowledge of the web site and the semantics for the temporal constructs into the hybrid recommender system. The proposed recommender parse the personalized ontology constructed for a user based on temporal navigation patterns and suggests the pages. The effectiveness of this approach is demonstrated by the experiments varying the scale of the data set and analyzed with the user’s satisfaction toward the quality of recommendations.

Keywords

Hybrid recommender system Ontology Usage patterns Temporal concepts 

References

  1. 1.
    Baldonado, M., Chang, C.-C.K., Gravano, L., Paepcke, A.: The Stanford digital library metadata architecture. Int. J. Digit. Libr. 1, 108–1211 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mobasher, B., Cooley, R., Srivastava, J.: Automatic personalization based on web usage mining. Comm. ACM 43(8), 142–151 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schiaffino, S., Amandi, A.: Intelligent user profiling. Artificial Intelligence, pp. 193–216. Springer, Berlin (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Miao, C., Yang, Q., Fang, H., Goh, A.: A cognitive approach for agent-based personalized recommendation. Knowl. Based Syst. 20, 397–405 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mooney, R.J., Roy, L.: Content-based book recommending using learning for text categorization. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference Digital Libraries (DL 2000), pp. 195–204 (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Umyarov, A., Tuzhilin, A.: Improving collaborative filtering recommendations using external data. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 8th International Conference Data Mining (ICDM 2008), pp. 618–627 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Melville, P., Mooney, R.J.: Content-boosted collaborative filtering for improved recommendations. In: Proceedings of the 18th National Conference Artificial Intelligence, pp. 187–192 (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tuzhilin, A., Adomavicius, G.: Integrating user behavior and collaborative methods in recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the CHI 1999 Workshop “Interacting with recommender systems”, Pittsburgh, PA (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Baumann, S., Hummel, O.: Using cultural metadata for artist recommendations. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on WEB Delivering of Music (WEDELMUSIC03). Los Alamitos, CA, USA, pp. 138–141: IEEE Computer Society (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liang, T.P., Lai, H.-J.: Discovering user interests from web browsing behavior: an application to internet news services. In: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2002). Washington, DC, USA, pp. 2718–2727: IEEE Computer Society (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thakur, M., Jain, Y.K., Silakari, G.: Query based personalization in semantic web mining. In: IJACSA, vol. 2, no. 2 (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fong, A.C.M, Zhou, B., Hui, S.C., Hong, G.Y., Do, A.: Web content recommender system based on consumer behavior modeling. IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron. 57(2), 542–550 (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tang, J., Zhang, J., Yao, L., Li, J., Zhang, L., Su, Z.: Arnetminer: extraction and mining of academic social networks. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD 2008), pp. 990–998 (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    McGuinness, D.L., Van Harmelen, F.: OWL Web ontology language overview. W3C Recommendation. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-features/. Accessed Feb 2004
  15. 15.
    Venu Gopalachari, M., Sammulal, P.: Personalized web page recommender system using integrated usage and content knowledge. In: the Proceedings of 2014 IEEE ICACCCT, pp. 1066–1071 (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gerd Stumme, R., Taouil, Y., Bastide, N.Pasquier, Lakhal, L.: Computing iceberg concept lattices with TITANIC. Data Knowl. Eng. 42(2), 189–222 (2002)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chaitanya Bharathi Institute of TechnologyHyderabadIndia
  2. 2.Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Hyderabad College of EngineeringKarimnagarIndia

Personalised recommendations