Advertisement

Adaptive Filter Design for Extraction of Fetus ECG Signal

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 380)

Abstract

The fetal ECG is a useful tool in the assessment of condition of fetus heart before and during labor time and also contains more information than sonography. Early detection of fetal heart defect helps the selection of appropriate treatment before and during pregnancy. FECG signal obtained by non-invasive method is affected from the background noise and MECG interference as FECG signal is weak relative to MECG signal and competing noise. This interference produced by MECG signal and other artifacts can be canceled by application of adaptive filters using LMS and RLS algorithms. In this paper, we have purposed an adaptive filter algorithm which has shown better results than standard LMS algorithm for the detection of Fetus ECG Signal.

Keywords

FECG MECG RLS LMS 

References

  1. 1.
    De Lathauwer, L., et al.: Fetal electrocardiogram extraction by blind source separation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 47(5), 567–572 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Van Bemmel, J.H.: Detection of weak electro-cardiograms by autocorrelation and cross correlation envelopes. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 15, 17–23 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Callaerts, D., De Moor, B., Vandwalle, J., Sansen, W.: Comparison of SVD methods to extract the fetal ECG from coetaneous electrode signals. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 28, 217–224 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rizk, M.S., et al.: Virtues and Vices of Source Separation Using Linear Independent Component Analysis for Blind Source Separation of Nonlinearly Coupled and Synchronized Fetal and Mother ECGs. IEEE EMBS, USA (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Akay, M., Mulder, E.: Examining fetal heart-rate variability using matching pursuits. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 15(5), 64–67 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zgallai, W.: Non-invasive fetal heartbeat detection using bispectral contour matching. In: International Conference on Electronics, Biomedical Engineering and its Application, pp. 7–8. Dubai (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Agante, P.M., de Sá, J.P.M.: ECG noise filtering using wavelets with soft thresholding methods. In: Proceedings of the Computers in Cardiology’99, pp. 535–542 (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sameni, R.: Extraction of Fetal Cardiac Signals. PhD Thesis Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, IranGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schreiber, T., Kaplan, D.: Signal separation by nonlinear projections, The fetal electrocardiogram. Phys. Rev. E 53, R4326 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zgallai, W., et al.: Third-order cumulant signature matching technique for non-invasive fetal heart beat identification. IEEE ICASSP 5, 3781–3784. Germany (1997)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Widrow, B., et al.: Adaptive noise cancellation: principles and applications. Proc. IEEE 63(12), 1692–1716 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kholdi, E., et al.: A new GA-Based adaptive filter for fetal ECG extraction, Word academy of science engineering and technology 54, 2011. In: Prasanth, K., et al. (ed.) Fetal ECG Extraction Using Adaptive Filters, vol. 2, issue 4 April (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Larks, S.D.: Present status of fetal electrocardiography. IEEE Trans. Bio-med. Electron. 9(3), 176–180 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Drumright, T.: Adaptive Filtering. Spring, USA (1998)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zgallai, W.: Embedded volterra for prediction of electromyographic signals during labor. In: The 16th IEEE International Conference DSP, Greece (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysicsS.L.I.E.T.SangrurIndia
  2. 2.Department of Electronics and CommunicationG.N.D.U.AmritsarIndia
  3. 3.Department of Electronics and CommunicationG.N.D.U.AmritsarIndia

Personalised recommendations