A Monotonic Digitally Controlled Delay Element-Based Programmable Trigger Pulse Generator

  • Amit Krishna Dwivedi
  • Manisha Guduri
  • Rishab Mehra
  • Aminul Islam
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 379)

Abstract

This paper presents a resourceful utilization of a monotonic digitally controlled delay element (DCDE) to propose a programmable high frequency trigger pulse generator circuit (TPG). Performance evaluation of various analog and digital programmable delay elements (DEs) have been carried out to reach the conclusions presented. Further, this work exploits a monotonic DCDE along with an efficient XOR circuitry, to realize the proposed TPG. The proposed design generates a very high frequency ultra-thin pulses of pulse duration ranging from 56 to 170 ps for digital input vector ranging from ‘00000’ to ‘11111’, respectively. The proposed design has been extensively verified using SPICE @ 16-nm predictive technology model.

Keywords

Programmable delay circuits Trigger pulse generator Digitally controlled delay element 

References

  1. 1.
    Salameh, D., Linton, D.: Novel Wide Bandwidth GAAS Sampling MMIC using Microstrip Based Nonlinear Transmission Line (NLTL) and NLTL Shock Wave Generator Design, IEEE 28th European Microwave Conference, pp. 18–23 (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dwivedi, A.K, Urma, K.A., Islam, A.: Trigger pulse generator using proposed buffered delay model and its application. Act. Passive Electron. Compon. Article ID 920508, 9 p, 2015. doi: 10.1155/2015/920508
  3. 3.
    Dwivedi, A.K., Urma, K.A., Kumar, A., Islam, A.: Robust Design of CNFET Based Buffered Delay Model and Microwave Pulse Generator, In: IEEE International Conference on Devices, Circuits and Communications (ICDCCom—2014), BIT, Mesra, Ranchi, India, September 12–13, 2014Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mahapatra, N.R., Tareen, A., Garimella, S.V.: Comparison and analysis of delay elements, In: The 2002 45th Midwest Symposium on Circuits and Systems, IEEE press, vol. 02, pp. II-473- II-476, Aug (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rabaey, J.M.: Digital integrated circuits: A design perspective, Prentice-Hall Book Company, 1st edn, ISBN #0-13-178609-1. Upper Saddle River, NJ (1996)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mahapatra, N.R., Garimella, S.V., Tareen, A.: Efficient techniques based on gate triggering for designing static CMOS ICs with very low glitch power dissipation, In: Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, vol. 2, pp. 537–540, Geneva, Switzerland, May 28–31 (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Maymandi-Nejad, M., Sachdev, M.: A monotonic digitally controlled delay element. IEEE J. Solid-State Circ. 40(11), 2212–2219 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Srivastava, P., Dwivedi, A.K., Islam, A.: Power—and Variability-Aware Design of FinFET-Based XOR Circuit at Nanoscale Regime, In: IEEE International Conference on Advanced Communications, Control and Computing Technologies (ICACCCT), Ramanathapuram, Tamilnadu, India, May 08–10, 2014, pp. 440–444Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    [Online]. Available: http://ptm.asu.edu/
  10. 10.
    Pai, C.S., Diodato, P.W., Liu, R.: A case study of RC effects to circuit performance. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 1998 International Interconnect Technology Conference, IEEE press, 1998, pp. 244–246, doi: 10.1109/IITC.1998.704911

Copyright information

© Springer India 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amit Krishna Dwivedi
    • 1
  • Manisha Guduri
    • 1
  • Rishab Mehra
    • 1
  • Aminul Islam
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electronics and Communication EngineeringBirla Institute of TechnologyRanchiIndia

Personalised recommendations