Abstract
The growing number of disasters increases the requirements for transportation in humanitarian logistics above all in the last mile. As a result, fleet management of NGOs is recognized as very important for both quick response and long-term local development. Currently global fleet managers of NGOs have to choose mainly between high local availability and optimal capacity utilization to provide quick response. However, NGOs are also increasingly required to contribute to the long-term economic development according to the sustainable livelihood approach fostering social and economic growth especially in rural communities. This paper proposes an alternative humanitarian logistics model based on service-dominant logic. The model aims at both improving the response times of the fleets of NGOs and the long-term logistics connectivity in rural areas combining humanitarian logistics and local commercial mobility through a truck-sharing solution.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Balcik B, Beamon BM, Smilowitz K (2008) Last mile distribution in humanitarian relief. J Intell Transp Syst 12(2):51–63
Balcik B, Beamon BM, Krejci CC, Muramatsu KM, Ramirez M (2010) Coordination in humanitarian relief chains: practices, challenges and opportunities. Int J Prod Econ 126(1):22–34
Ballantyne D, Varey RJ (2006) Creating value-in-use through marketing interaction: the exchange logic of relating, communicating and knowing. Mark Theory 6(3):335–348
Barbarosoğlu G, Özdamar L, Çevik A (2002) An interactive approach for hierarchical analysis of helicopter logistics in disaster relief operations. Eur J Oper Res 140(1):118–133
Berger P, Luckmann T (1967) The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Penguin Publishers, London
Besiou M, Stapleton O, Van Wassenhove LN (2011) System dynamics for humanitarian operations. J Humanitarian Logist Supply Chain Manag 1(1):78–103
Carney D (2002) Sustainable livelihood approaches: progress and possibilities for change. DFID Department for International Development, Toronto
Edvardsson B, Tronvoll B, Gruber T (2011) Expanding understanding of service exchange and value co-creation: a social construction approach. J Acad Mark Sci 39(2):327–339
Esper TL, Jensen TD, Turnipseed FL, Burton S (2003) The last mile: an examination of effects of online retail delivery strategies on consumers. J Bus Logist 24(2):177–203
Giddens A (1984) The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press, Berkeley
Grönroos C (1979) An applied theory for marketing industrial services. Ind Mark Manag 8(1):45–50
Grönroos C, Ravald A (2011) Service as business logic: implications for value creation and marketing. J Serv Manag 22(1):5–22
Guha-Sapir D, Vos F, Below R, Ponserre S (2012) Annual disaster statistical review 2011: the numbers and trends. Ciaco Imprimerie, Louvain-la-Neuve
Gupta AK (2008) Linking vertical and horizontal markets for innovations at grassroots: sustainability imperative. Future of logistics conference. Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Hannover
HolguÃn-Veras J, Jaller M, Van Wassenhove LN, Pérez N, Wachtendorf T (2012) On the unique features of post-disaster humanitarian logistics. J Oper Manag 30(7/8):494–506
Kar K, Datta TK (2009) An overview of mobility and safety issues related to highway transportation in India. ITE J 79(8):40–45
Kilimann S (2011) Carsharing: Jeder will jetzt teilen. Available at: http://www.zeit.de/auto/2011-06/carsharing-konkurrenz. Accessed 15 June 2013
Kovács G, Spens K (2007) Humanitarian logistics in disaster relief operations. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 37(2):99–114
Kovács G, Spens K (2011) Trends and developments in humanitarian logistics – a gap analysis. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 41(1):32–45
Kunz N, Reiner G (2012) A meta-analysis of humanitarian logistics research. J Humanitarian Logist Supply Chain Manag 2(2):116–147
Lovelock C, Gummesson E (2004) Whither services marketing?: In search of a new paradigm and fresh perspectives. J Serv Res 7(1):20–41
Moeller S, Wittkowski K (2010) The burdens of ownership: reasons for preferring renting. Manag Serv Qual 20(2):176–191
Oloruntoba R, Gray R (2006) Humanitarian aid: an agile supply chain? Supply Chain Manag 11(2):115–120
Pedraza Martinez AJ, Van Wassenhove LN (2013) Vehicle replacement in the international committee of the red cross. Prod Oper Manag 22(2):365–376
Pedraza Martinez AJ, Stapleton O, Van Wassenhove LN (2011) Field vehicle fleet management in humanitarian operations: a case-based approach. J Oper Manag 29(5):404–421
Pettit S, Beresford A (2009) Critical success factors in the context of humanitarian aid supply chains. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 39(6):450–468
Ramachandran J, Pant A, Pani SK (2012) Building the BoP producer ecosystem: the evolving engagement of Fabindia with Indian handloom artisans. J Prod Innov Manag 29(1):33–51
Schaefers T, Moser R (2011) Non-ownership mobility services in rural India: a consumer-preference study. Strategic Management Society – Special Conference, San Diego
Scoones I (1998) Working paper 72: sustainable rural livelihoods: a framework for analysis. Institute for Development Studies, Brighton
Smith L, Maull R, Ng ICL (2011) Servitization and operations management: a service dominant logic approach. The University of Exeter Business School Discussion Papers in Management. The University of Exeter Business School, Exeter
TERI (2008) Mobility for development: Bangalore, India. The Energy and Resources Institute (TERI) & World Business Council for Sustainable Development, New Delhi
Thomas A, Kopczak L (2005) From logistics to supply chain management: the path forward for the humanitarian sector. The Fritz Institute, San Francisco. Available at: www.fritzinstitute.org/PDFs/WhitePaper/FromLogisticsto.pdf. Accessed 04 Jan 2013
Van Wassenhove LN (2006) Humanitarian aid logistics: supply chain management in high gear. J Oper Res Soc 57(5):475–489
Van Wassenhove LN, Pedraza Martinez AJ (2012) Using OR to adapt supply chain management best practices to humanitarian logistics. Int Trans Oper Res 19(1/2):307–322
Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2004) Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. J Mark 68(1):1–17
Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2008a) From goods to service(s): divergences and convergences of logics. Ind Mark Manag 37(3):254–259
Vargo SL, Lusch RF (2008b) Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution. J Acad Mark Sci 36(1):1–10
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hirschinger, M., Moser, R. (2016). Non-Ownership Commercial Mobility and Humanitarian Logistics: New Perspectives to Improve Response Times and Long-Term Impact. In: Sahay, B., Gupta, S., Menon, V. (eds) Managing Humanitarian Logistics. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2416-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2416-7_4
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2415-0
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2416-7
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)