Abstract
India has been characterized by wide regional variation in the level of human development across states. By constructing a human development index (HDI) using Euclidean distance, this chapter makes an attempt to evaluate the trend and level of inequality in human development across the states of India with respect to 11 socioeconomic indicators. The test of convergence of composite human development index (CHDI) as well as its indicators reveals that the Indian states are converging in terms of the level of human development. Interestingly, polarization in the level of human development shows a tendency to increase along with reducing trend in inequality especially during the period 1981–2001. It is expected that a targeted level of human development can reduce the extent of polarization and thus, can bring out a balanced human development in Indian states.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arrar A (2008) On the decomposition of polarization indices: illustration with Chinese and Nigerian Household Survey, Working Paper provided by CIRPEE in its series Cahiers de recherchér with number 0806
Barro RJ, Sala-i-Martin X (1992) Convergence. J Political Econ 100:223–251
Cashin P, Ratna S (1996) Regional economic growth and convergence in India. Finance Dev 33(1):49–52
Dasgupta P (1993) An inquiry into well being and destitution. Oxford Clarendon, Oxford
Dholakia RH (2003) Regional disparity in economic and human development in India. Econ Political Wkly 38(39):4166–4172
Dreze J, Sen A (1995) India: Economic Development and Social Opportunity, New Delhi: Oxford University Press
EPW Research Foundation (2009) Domestic product of states of India 1960–61 to 2006–07, April, Mumbai, India
Esteban J-M, Ray D (1994) On the measurement of polarization. Econometrica 62(4):819–851
Gaur AK (2010) Estimating deprivation and inequality in human well beings: a case study of Indian states, Paper presented for the 31st general conference of the International Association for Research in Income and Wealth August 22–28, 2010
Ghosh M (2006) Economic growth and human development in Indian States. Econ Political Wkly 41(30):3321–3329
Ghosh B, Marjit S, Neogi C (1998) Economic growth and regional divergence in India, 1960 to 1995. Econ Political Wkly 33(26):1623–1630
GoI (2002) National Human Development Report 2001, Planning Commission, Government of India, New Delhi
Green WH (2003) Econometric Analysis, Fifth Edition, Pearson Education (Singapore) Pvt. Ltd., Patparganj, Delhi, India
Gupta D (2009) Disparities in development, status of women and social opprtunities: Indian experience. J Altern Perspect Soc Sci 1(3):687–719
World Health Organisation (2000) Health systems: Improving performance. World Health Organisation
Marjit S, Mitra S (1996) Convergence in regional growth rates: Indian research agenda. Econ Political Wkly 31(33):2239–242
Majumdar R (2005) Human development in India: Regional pattern and policy issues. Indian J Appl Econ 2(1):1–24
Morris DM.(1979) Measuring the condition of the world’s poor. New York, Pergamon (published for the Overseas Development Council)
National Human Development Report (NHDR) (2001) Planning Commission, Government of India, New Delhi
Nayyar G (2008) Economic growth and regional inequality in India. Econ Political Wkly 43(6):58–67
Noorbakhsh F (2003) Human development and regional disparity in India, Working paper with number 2003_12 from Buisness School Economics, University of Glasgow
Rahman T, Mittelhammer RC (2004) Distribution in human development, child labour and poverty in India. Paper presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Denver, Colorado, August 1–4
Ram R (1982) Composite indices of PQLI, basic needs fulfilment and income: a principal component representation. J Dev Econ 11(2):227–47
Raman J (1997) Convergence or uneven development: a note on regional development in India. Indian Econ J 44(4):134–144
Rao SK (1973) A note on measuring economic distances between regions in India. Econ Political Wkly 8(17):793–800
Rao MG, Shand RT, Kalirajan KP (1999) Convergence of incomes across Indian states. Econ Political Wkly 34(13):769–778
Roy H, Bhattacharya K (2009) Convergence of human development across Indian States, IGIDR Proceeding Project Report Series, August 9–12
Sampath RK (1977) Inter-state inequalities in income in India: 1951–1971. Indian J Reg Sci 9(1):1–12
Sen A (1985) Commodities and capabilities, Hennipman lectures in Economics, Vol. 7. Elsevier Science Pub. Co., Amsterdam
Sen A (1997) On economic inequality. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Tsui K-yu, Wang Y (1998) Polarisation ordering and new classes of polarisation indices. Memo, the Chinese University of Hong Kong University
Wolfson MC (1994) When inequalities diverge. Am Econ Rev 84(2):353–358
Zhang X, Kanbur R (2001) What difference do polarisation measures make? An application to China. J Dev Stud 37(3):85–98
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
5A1: A note on Euclidean distance
The Euclidean distance is measured by the following index
where \({\sigma_i}\) is the standard deviation of the \({x_i}\) over the sample set. The distance function in Euclidean space is defined as follows:
Let point u be the n tuple (a1, a2, …., an) and point v be the n tuple (b1, b2, …, bn) then the Euclidean distance function is
where the square root is taken to be positive (Chiang 2004).
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Banerjee, A., Kuri, P. (2015). Regional Disparity and Convergence in Human Development in India. In: Development Disparities in India. India Studies in Business and Economics. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2331-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2331-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2330-6
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2331-3
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)