Skip to main content

Planning for Aseismic Buildings

  • Chapter
  • 1675 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter focuses on what constitutes a good configuration for a building structure and how to achieve it. Different types of irregularities are discussed together with their implications and methods to minimize their negative impact. The important question regarding evaluation of torsional moment in a multi-storey building is dealt with. This is followed by matters of concern to a designer such as pounding between buildings and effect of weakness in structural anatomy such as soft storeys and short columns. Measures to be taken to minimize the detrimental impact of these problems are also enumerated. Importance of load path integrity and the necessity to build in redundancy are emphasized. Some of the key factors in present day force-based design procedure are highlighted. Illustrative examples show how effect of soft storey and weak storey can be quantifiably gauged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arnold C, Reitherman R (1982) Building configuration and seismic design. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertero RD, Bertero VV (1999) Redundancy in earthquake resistant design. ASCE J Struct Eng 125:81–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BIS (2001) IS 4326- Ed 3.2, Earthquake resistant design and construction of buildings – code of practice

    Google Scholar 

  • BIS (2002a) IS 1893 (Part1), Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures – part 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Fardis MN (2009) Seismic design, assessment & retrofitting of concrete bldgs. Springer, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA 273 (1997) NEHRP guidelines for seismic rehabilitation of buildings. FEMA, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMA P 750 (2009) NEHRP recommended seismic provisions for new buildings and other structures. FEMA, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Goel RK, Chopra AK (1993) Seismic code analysis of buildings without locating centers of rigidity. ASCE, J Struct Eng 119(10)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain SK (2003) Review of Indian seismic code IS 1893(Part1):2002. ICJ 77:1414

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain SK, Ingle RK, Mondal G (2006) Proposed codal provisions for design and detailing of beam-column joints in seismic regions. ICJ 18:16–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith BS, Coull A (1991) Tall building structures: analysis and design. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tso WK (1990) Static eccentricity concept for torsional moment estimations. ASCE J Struct Eng 116(5):1199–1212

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer India

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Manohar, S., Madhekar, S. (2015). Planning for Aseismic Buildings. In: Seismic Design of RC Buildings. Springer Transactions in Civil and Environmental Engineering. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2319-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2319-1_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi

  • Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2318-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2319-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics