Abstract
Policy makers and city administrators are in a dilemma on to which strategies they should embark while planning their transportation systems. This chapter presents a case study-based approach to compare the advantages, by means of marginal abatement cost of carbon by choosing global emission mitigation strategies compared to the local emission mitigation strategies in transportation planning. It draws comparison among three strategies such as CO2 control strategies, total suspended particle control strategies, and hydrocarbon control strategies. By employing optimization model for the selection of vehicular mix with due consideration to the cleaner alternatives, for the future travel needs, this chapter presents the marginal abatement costs for various strategies that demonstrates the potential to support the cities financially.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Yedla S (2002) Environmentally sustainable urban transportation – comparative analysis of local mitigation strategies against GHG Mitigation Strategies, Post-doctoral fellowship report, AIT, Bangkok, Thailand
Yedla S, Shrestha RM, Anandrajah G (2005) Environmentally sustainable urban transportation – comparative analysis of local emission mitigation strategies vis-à-vis GHG mitigation strategies. Transp Policy, Elsevier 12(3):245–254
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yedla, S. (2015). Choosing Between Global Environmental Strategies Vis-à-Vis Local Mitigation Strategies: Application of Multi-criteria Analysis. In: Urban Transportation and the Environment. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2313-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2313-9_9
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2312-2
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2313-9
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)