Advertisement

Role of Team Leaders in Employee Faith in the Performance Appraisal Practices: An Exploratory Study on the Software Professionals in Some Selected IT Companies in West Bengal (India)

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 340)

Abstract

The organizations are in a continuous search of a bias free and an integrated performance measurement and management system for their employees in order to attain business excellence and achieve organizational goals to sustain in the long run in the market coping with the competitive environment. The research study is conducted on some selected IT companies operating at West Bengal, to get a comparative view of the factors affecting the concept of faith among the employee about the performance appraisal system practiced in these organizations. The exploratory study also aimed to examine the comparative influence of these appraisal based factors on the concept of faith in the appraisal process among the employees of the IT companies’ understudy. The study found a significant difference between the influences of the factors on the concept of faith among the employees.

Keywords

Faith Job derivative Growth latitude Innovation 

References

  1. 1.
    Adams, J.: Inequity in social exchange. In: Berkowitz, L. (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 2. Academic Press, New York (1965)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ankur, Bajpai, V.N.: Knowledge management and creative HRM. In: INDIAcom—2nd National Conference on Computing for Nation Development (p. 30). Bharati Vidyapee’s Institute of Computer Application and Management, New Delhi (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Armstrong, M., Boron, A.: Performance management. In: A strategic and integrated approach to achieve success. Jaico Publishing House, Mumbai (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benedict, M.E., Levine, E.L.: Delay and distortion: tacit influences on performance appraisal effectiveness. J. Appl. Psychol. 73(3), 507–514 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bhatnagar, D., Dixit, M.: Stages in multiple innovation in software firms: a model derived from Infosys and NIIT case studies. In: D’costa A.P., Sridharan, E. (eds.) India in the Global Software Industry: Innovation, Firm Strategies and Development, Chapter 10. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Byrne, Z.S.: Fairness reduces the negative effects of organizational politics on turnover intentions, citizenship behavior and job performance. J. Bus. Psychol. 20(2), 175–200 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Byrne, Z., Cropanzano, R.: The history of organizational justice: the founders speak. In: Cropanzano, R. (ed.) Justice in the Workplace: From Theory to Practice, pp. 3–26. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, Mahwah (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cardy, R.L., Dobbins, G.H.: Performance appraisal: alternative perspectives. South-Western Publishing, Cincinnati (1994)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Folger, R.: Distributive and procedural justice: combined impact of voice and improvement on experienced inequity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 35(2), 108–119 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Folger, R., Konovsky, M.A.: Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Acad. Manag. J. 32(1), 115–130 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Folger, R., Konovsky, M.A., Cropanzano, R.: A due process metaphor for performance appraisal. Res. Organ. Behav. 14, 129–177 (1992)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ilavarasan, V.: Is indian software workforce a case of uneven and combined development. Equal. Opportunities Int. 26, 802–822 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim, W.C., Mauborgne, R.: Fair process: managing in the knowledge economy. Harvard Bus. Rev. 75(4), 65–75 (1995)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Leventhal, G.S.: What should be done with equity theory. In: Gargen, K.J. (ed.) Social Exchange: Advances in Theory and Research, pp. 27–55. Plenum, New York (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Meyer, J.P., Allen, N.J.: A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Hum. Resour. Manage. Rev. 1(1), 61–89 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Malik, K.A., Bakhtawar, B.: Impact of appraisal system on employee performance: a comparison of permanent and contractual employees of Pakistan Telecommunications Company Limited (PTCL). Eur. Sci. J., 98–109Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Murphy, K.R., Cleveland, J.N.: Understanding Performance Appraisal: Social, Organizational, and Goal based Perspectives. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1995)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    NASSCOM: IT—BPO Sector in India: A strategic Review. NASSCOM, Delhi (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    NASSCOM: Members. Retrieved www.nasscom.org/members (2012)
  20. 20.
    Organ, D.W.: The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. Res. Organ. Behav. 12, 43–72 (1990)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pareek, U., Rao, T.V.: Designing and Managing Human Resource System. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co., Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi (2006)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Saks, A.: Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. J. Manag. Psychol. 21(7), 600–619 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Skarlicki, D.P., Folger, R.: Retaliation in the workplace: the roles of distributive, procedural and interactional justice. J. Appl. Psychol. 82, 434–443 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ulrich, D.: Human Resource Champions: The Next Agenda for Adding Value and Delivering Results. Harvard Business School, Boston (1997)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Upadhya, C., Vasavi, A.R.: Work Culture and Sociality in the Indian IT Industry: A Sociological Study. School of Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Campus, Bangalore (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Technology and ManagementUniversity of KalyaniKalyani, NadiaIndia
  2. 2.Department of Business AdministrationUniversity of KalyaniKalyani, NadiaIndia

Personalised recommendations