Health-System Evaluation: A Multi-attribute Decision Making Approach

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 340)


The aim of this paper is to present an evaluation approach based on multi-attribute group decision making (MAGDM) technique for helping the health-care department of a country to review the over-all health-system of a state over time. In the process of decision making, experts provide their opinions linguistically regarding the alternatives depending on a finite set of interrelated attributes. Subsequently suitable aggregation method is applied to determine the overall performance value to make a final decision. Finally, we present health-system evaluation of a state for the time periods, namely, \( \{ t_{1} ,t_{2} , \ldots ,t_{n} \} \) in order to judge whether the over-all health system of the state improves over time or not.


Bonferroni mean Multi-attribute decision making Health-system evaluation Linguistic 2-tuple 


  1. 1.
    Hiramani, A.B.: Health education: an Indian perspective. B.R. Publishing Corporation, Delhi (1996)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ibrahim, J.E.: Performance indicators from all perspectives. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 13, 431–432 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McLoughlin, V., Leatherman, S., Fletcher, M., Owen, J.W.: Improving performance using indicators: recent experiences in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 13, 455–462 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    World Health Organisation: Murray, J.L.C., Evans, D.B. (eds.) Health system performance assessment: debates, methods, empiricism. World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Arah, O.A., Westert, G.P.: Correlates of health and health care performance: applying the Canadian health indicators framework at the provincial territorial level. BMC Health Serv. Res. 5, 76 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Loeb, M.J.: The current state of performance measurement in health care. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 16(1), i5–i9 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Klassen, A., Miller, A., Anderson, N., Shen, J., Schiariti, V., et al.: Performance measurement and improvement frameworks in health, education and social services systems: a systematic review. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 22, 44–69 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Arah, O.A., Klazinga, N.S., Delnoij, D.M.J., Asbroek, A.H.A., Custers, T.: Conceptual frameworks for health systems performance: a quest for effectiveness, quality, and improvement. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 15, 377–398 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yager, R.R.: On generalized Bonferroni mean operators for multi-criteria aggregation. Int. J. Approx. Reasoning 50, 1279–1286 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dutta, B., Guha, D., Mesiar, R.: A model based on linguistic 2-tuples for dealing with heterogeneous relationship among attributes in multi-expert decision making. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Systs. (Accepted)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Koksalan, M., Ulu, C.: An interactive approach for placing alternatives in preference classes. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 144, 429–439 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Degani, R., Bortolan, G.: The problem of linguistic approximation in clinical decision making. Int. J. Approx. Reasoning 2, 143–162 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Delgado, M., Verdegay, J.L., Vila, M.A.: On aggregation operations of linguistic labels. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 8, 351–370 (1993)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Herrera, F., Martinez, L.: A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 8, 746–752 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Martinez, L., Herrera, F.: An overview on the 2-tuple linguistic model for computing with words in decision making: extensions, applications and challenges. Inform. Sci. 207, 1–18 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Peters, D.H., Yazbeck, A.S., Sharma, R.R., Ramana, G.N.V., Pritchett, L.H., Wagsta, A.: Better health system for India’s poor: funding analysis and options. The World Bank, Washington, D.C (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Adam, T., Hsu, J., Savigny, D., Lavis, J.N., Rttingen, J.-A., Bennett, S.: Evaluating health systems strengthening interventions in low-income and middle-income countries: are we asking the right questions? Health Policy Plan. 27(4), 9–19 (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Murray, C.J.L., Frenk, J.: A WHO framework for health system performance assessment. GPE discussion paper series: no. 6. World Health Organization, Geneva (1999)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rodriguez, R.M., Martinez, L.: An analysis of symbolic linguistic computing models in decision making. Int. J. Gen Syst. 42, 121–136 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsIndian Institute of TechnologyPatnaIndia

Personalised recommendations