Advertisement

Comparison of Indian and Central European Shape Contour Meaning Comprehension

  • Vanja ČokEmail author
  • Mihael Kline
  • Nikola Vukašinović
  • Jože Duhovnik
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 34)

Abstract

Since every culture has their own specifics, there is often the question, whether customers from diverse cultures perceive shape characteristics equally or differently? This study explore how two different cultural groups (Indian vs. Central European) of participants experience or response to predefined four types of product dimensions—aesthetic, functional, social and future. We assume that the Central-European and Indian students differ by their perception of different shapes. To gather the necessary statistical data, we prepared questionnaires wherein the samples were assessed using the semantic differential technique and a five-level Likert scale. The responses were then analyzed using Factor analysis. After conducting statistical analysis using Factor analysis, two main affective dimensions were gained, which show how differentiate Central-European and Indian participants. The methodology presented in this study can help designers to identify a pattern of consumer shape categorization.

Keywords

Central European South Asian (Indian) Shape contour Product characteristics 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to express gratitude to all the colleagues who were involved into this survey. Special thanks to Indian institute of Technology Madras (Prof. Dr. V. Raghu Prakash), Indian institute of Science, Bangalore (Prof. B. Gurumoorthy), Industrial Design Centre, IIT Bombay (Ms. Susmita Sharma), Budapest University of Technology and Economics (Prof. Balazs Vidovics), Mechanical Engineering Faculty in Slavonski Brod University of Osijek (Prof. Dr. Milan Kljajin), Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Ljubljana. This survey has been done with financial support of Ministry of Higher Education, Science and Technology.

References

  1. 1.
    Schütte, S.: Engineering emotional values in product design kansei engineering in development, Linköping, Linköping Studies in Science and Technology, Dissertation 951 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schmitt, B.H., Simonson, A.: Marketing Aesthetics: The Strategic Management of Brands, Identity and Image. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dumaine, B.: Design That Sells and Sells and …” Fortune, (March 11), pp. 86–94 (1991)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Desmet, P., Hekkert, P., Hillen, M., Desmet, P.M.A., Hekkert, P., Hillen, M.G.: Values and emotions; an empirical investigation in the relationship between emotional responses to products and human values. In: Proceedings of the Fifth European academy of design conference (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shukla, P., Purani, K.: Comparing the importance of luxury value perceptions in cross-national contexts. J. Bus. Res. 65(10), 1417–1424 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Matsumoto, D., Fazilet, K., Kooken, K.: American-Japanese cultural differences in judgements of expression intensity and subjective experience. Cogn. Emot. 13(2), 201–218 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ekman, P., Sorenson, E.R., Friesen, W.V.: Pan-cultural elements in facial displays of emotion. Science 164, 86–88 (1969)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Russell, P.: The aesthetics of rectangle proportion: effects of judgment scale and context. Am. J. Psychology. 113(1), 27–42 (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jordan P.W.: Designing Pleasurable Product. Taylor and Francis, United Kingdom (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hofstede, G.: Cultures and Organisations. Harper Collins, London (1994)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shukla, P., Purani, K.: Comparing the importance of luxury value perceptions in cross-national contexts. J. Bus. Res. 65(10), 1417–1424 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang, Y., Feick, L., Prince, L.J.: The Impact of self-construal on aesthetic preference for angular versus rounded shapes. Soc. Pers. Soc. Psychol. PSPB 32(6), 794–805 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nisbett, R.E.: The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently…and Why. Free Press, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bloch P.H., Brunel F.F., Arnold T.J.: Individual differences in the centrality of visual product aesthetics: concept and measurement. J. Consum. Res. 29(4), 551–565 (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Douglas, M., Isherwood, B.: The World Of Goods: Towards an Anthropology of Consumption. Routledge, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Diehl, J.C.: Globalization and cross cultural product design. In: International Design Conference-Design. Dubrovnik, Croatia (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Berlyne, D.E.: Aesthetics and Psychobiology. Appleton‐Century‐Crofts, New York (1971)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Crilly, N., Moultrie, J., Clarkson, P.J.: Seeing things: consumer response to the visual domain in product design. Des. Stud. 25(6) 547–577 (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Desmet, P.M.A., Hekkert, P.: Framework of product experience. Int. J. Des. 1(1), 13–23 (2007)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Russell, J.A., Caroll, J.M.: On the bipolarity of positive and negative affect. Psychol. Bull. 125(1), 3–30 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Russell, J.A.: A circumplex model of affect. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 39(6), 1161–1178 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Field, A.: Discovering statistics using SPSS, 3rd edn. SAGE Publications Ltd, Thousand Oaks (2009)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gordon, K.: Esthetics. Henry Holt, New York (1909), retrieved from https://archive.org/details/esthetics00gorduoft
  24. 24.
    Derné, S.: The (limited) effect of cultural globalization in India: implications of culture theory (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vanja Čok
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mihael Kline
    • 2
  • Nikola Vukašinović
    • 1
  • Jože Duhovnik
    • 1
  1. 1.LECAD Lab, Faculty of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia
  2. 2.Chair of Marketing Communications and Public Relation, Faculty of Social SciencesUniversity of LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations