Advertisement

Investigating Frequently Used Stroke Sequence, of Handwritten Devanagari Letters, by Observing Second Script Learners

  • Santosh KshirsagarEmail author
  • Ravi Poovaiah
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 34)

Abstract

Eleven scripts are used in multilingual India today. However, not enough research is found in the domain of handwriting acquisition. In this study, we investigate Devanagari handwriting activity by observing its second script learners. A text paragraph containing basic Devanagari letters, numbers and few consonant clusters, is given to a selection of students, who have learnt Devanagari as the second script. This activity is captured using a movie camera. A similar activity is conducted on a student who has learnt Devanagari as the first script. We separate key letters from the scanned manuscript for observation of shape and stroke sequence. To observe the direction and sequence of strokes, we separate video clips of key letters. In this paper, we present a detailed analysis of the key letter ‘Ka’. It is observed that second script learners exhibit a variety in the types of stroke sequences used to produce the letter. Cross-checking the stroke sequence in a prescribed school book, provides us insights on the ideal stroke sequence.

Keywords

Handwriting acquisition Second script Stroke sequence Devanagari 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Thanks to K.C. Matunga Municipal Tamil School and K.D. Gayakwad Municipal Telugu School, Mumbai for allowing us to conduct this experiment in their schools. Thanks to Noopur Datye for making and adding finishing touches to the images. Thanks to Lavanya Varadrajan for proofreading the text.

References

  1. 1.
    Sassoon, R.: The Acquisition of a Second Writing System. Oxford: Intellect (1995)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eighth Schedule occurs in articles 344(1), Constitution of Government of India 2004Google Scholar
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Eighth Schedule occurs in articles 351, Constitution of Government of India 2004Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jayaram, K.: Building Foundations for Reading and Writing. Paper presented at the USRN, JNU Seminar, 02. 30–31 Oct 2009Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Menon, D.S.: Historical and Theoretical Approaches to Early Literacy. Report of the Consultation on Early Literacy, 25–28 Apr 2011. Submitted to SRTT-NRTT, 27. (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gupta, D.R.: Teaching the indic scripts: tradition and innovation. Language in India, strength for today and bright hope for tomorrow 12(2), 425–441, (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nag, S., Snowling, M.J.: Reading in an alphasyllabary: implications for a language-universal theory of learning to read. 16th January 2014 (Pre-print version)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Walker, S.: Handwriting skills, models and methods. In: Edwards, V. (ed.) Encyclopaedia of Language and Education, vol. 2, pp. 97–105. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1997)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Koziatek, S.M., Powell, N.J.: Pencil grips, legibility, and speed of fourth-graders’ writing in cursive. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 57(03), 284–288 (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yakimishyn, J.E., Magill-Evans, J.: Comparisons among tools, surface orientation, and pencil grasp for children 23 months of age. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 56(5), 564–572 (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Clayton, E.: A history of learning to write, p. 13. http://www.ejf.org.uk/Resources/ejhandw.pdf
  13. 13.
    Greer, T., Lockman, J.: Using writing instruments: in variances in young children and adults. Soc. Res. Child. Dev. Child. Dev. 69(4), 888–902, (1998) (Blackwell Publishing)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    John, J.J.: Latin Palaeography, Medieval Studies, 2nd edn., p. 8. As sited in—Reimer Stephen, R., Manuscript Studies Medieval and Early Modern IV. iv. Palaeography: Letter Formation, University of Alberta; Edmonton, Canada, http://www.ualberta.ca/~sreimer/ms-course/course/pal-ltrs.htm (1998)
  15. 15.
    Sassoon, R.: Joins in children’s handwriting, and the effects of different models of teaching methods. Department of typography and graphic communication, University of Reading. Doctoral thesis, University of Reading, Department of Typography and Graphic Communication, UK, May 1988Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Joshi, R.K.: Calligraphy the Art of Writing, CALTIS-84, p. 129, Special Issue on Calligraphy, Lettering and Typography of Indian Script, CALTIS-84 Seminar held on 11, 12, 13 February at Pragati Maidan, New Delhi, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Palande, B.D.: Marathi First Book. Government Central Book Depot, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India (1867–1870)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    LeH, T.: Smith, Six Basic Factors in Handwriting Classification. J. Crim. Law, Criminol., Police Sci. 44(6), 810–816, (1954) (North-western University). Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1139934
  19. 19.
    Vinter, A., Chartrel, E.: Effects of different types of learning on handwriting movements in young children. Learn. Instr. 20, 476–486 (2010). www.elsevier.com/locate/learninstruc. (University of Bourgogne, Laboratoire d’Etude de l’Apprentissage et du De´veloppement (LEAD), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) UMR 5022 Poˆ le AAFE, Esplanade Erasme, BP 26513, 21065 Dijon Cedex, France)
  20. 20.
    Share, L.: On the anglo centricities of current reading research and practice-the perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychol. Bull. 134(4), 584–615 (2008)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Smith, P.: Handwriting in the United Kingdom. Reading Teach. 41(01), 27–31 (1987)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sir J.J. Institute of Applied Art, IDCIndian Institute of TechnologyMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.Industrial Design CentreIndian Institute of TechnologyMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations