Advertisement

A Case Study in Participatory Service Design for Rural Healthcare System in India Using a Pattern Language

  • Pramod KhambeteEmail author
  • Uday Athavankar
  • Pankaj Doke
  • Ratnendra Shinde
  • Debjani Roy
  • Sujit Devkar
  • Sanjay Kimbahune
  • Sujata Chaudhary
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 34)

Abstract

Application of a Service and Touch Point design pattern language for a rural healthcare service in India with the participation of a multidisciplinary team comprising designers, IT professionals, business analysts and doctors was studied. We discuss the process followed, and the benefits of using a service design pattern language. Specifically: the participants could start with a few patterns and progressively acquire an understanding of the patterns through mutual assistance; the patterns and associated sharable artefacts facilitated communication and continuity of thought process among the team members; the team could dynamically refine a set of appropriate patterns and were guided to rich, comprehensive and innovative solutions. The real life constraints neither hindered the progress nor the quality of the solutions. The potential of embedding the pattern language in a socio-technical system to mediate the process was demonstrated. The study provides several theoretical and practical insight concerning the use of pattern languages.

Keywords

Service design Participatory design Multidisciplinary design Design patterns Pattern language Healthcare 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was carried out under the aegis of TCS—IIT Bombay Research Cell funded by Tata Consultancy Services. We thank doctors from SGS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, notably Dr. Sunita Shanbhag, Dr. Mrudula Solanki and Dr. Pawan Sable for sharing their rich experience and participation, and the staff and doctors associated with the chosen Public Healthcare Centre who helped in the data collection stage.

References

  1. 1.
    Sangiorgi, D.: Building up a framework for service design research. In: Proceedings of 8th European Academy of Design Conference, pp. 415–420, Aberdeen, Scotland (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kimbell, L.: Designing for service as one way of designing services. Int. J. Des. 5(2), 41–52 (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Prahalad, C., Ramaswamy, V.: Co-creating unique value with customers. Strategy Leaders. 32(3), 4–9 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mamykina, L., Candy, L., Edmonds, E.: Collaborative creativity. Commun. ACM 45(10), 96–99 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fischer, G., Shipman, F.: Collaborative design rationale and social creativity in cultures of participation. Hum. Technol. 7(2), 164–187 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., Silverstein, M., Jecobson, M., Fiksdahl-King, I., Angel, S.: A pattern language. Oxford University Press, New York (1977)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Giaccardi, E., Fischer, G.: Creativity and evolution: a metadesign perspective. Dig. Creativity 19(1), 19–32 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thomas, J., Lee, A., Danis, C.: Enhancing creative design via software tools. Commun. ACM 45(10), 112–115 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Erickson, T.: Lingua Francas for design: sacred places and pattern languages. In: Proceedings of DIS ‘00, pp. 357–368, Brooklyn, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bowen, S., McSeveny, K., Lockley, E., Wolstenholme, D., Cobb, M., Dearden, A.: How was it for you? Experiences of participatory design in the UK health service. CoDesign: Int. J. CoCreation Des. Arts 9(4), 230–246 (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Khambete, P.: Designing desirable service experience: a pattern language framework for designing touch point ecosystems. PhD Thesis, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai, India (May 2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Khambete, P.: Pattern language for touch point ecosystem: a potent framework for multidisciplinary design. In: CADMC 2011 Cambridge Academic Design Management Conference, Cambridge, UK (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Park, K.: Park’s Textbook of Preventive and Social Medicine, 21st edn. Banarasidas Bhanot, Jabalpur (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bate, P., Robert, G.: Experience-based design: from redesigning the system around the patient to co-designing services with the patient. Qual. Saf. Health Care 15(5), 307–310 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brown, T., Wyatt, J.: Design thinking for social innovation. Stanford Soc. Innov. Rev., 31–35 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bessant, J., Maher, L.: Developing radical service innovations in healthcare—the role of design methods. Int. J. Innov. Manag. 13(4), 555–568 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Banerjee, A., Duflo, E., Glennerster, R., Kothari, D.: Improving immunisation coverage in rural India: clustered randomised controlled evaluation of immunisation campaigns with and without incentives. BMJ: Br. Med. J. 340 (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ramachandran, D., Canny, J., Das, P., Cutrell, E.: Mobile-izing health workers in rural India. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1889–1898 (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Herzlinger, R.: Why innovation in health care is so hard. Harvard Bus. Rev., 58–67 (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Coiera, E.: Four rules for the reinvention of health care. BMJ. Br. Med. J. 328, 1197–1199 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bondale, N., Kimbahune, S., Pande, A.: mHEALTH-PHC: an ICT tool for primary healthcare in India. IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag. 32(3), 31–38 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gremler, D.: The critical incident technique in service research. J. Serv. Res. 7(1), 65–89 (2004)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fincher, S., Windsor, P.: Why patterns are not enough: some suggestions concerning an organising principle for patterns of UI design. (2000)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Maher, M., Poon, J., Boulanger, S.: Formalising design exploration as co-evolution, pp. 3–30 (1996)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dorst, K., Cross, N.: Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution. Des. Stud. 22(5), 425–437 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Goel, A., Bhatta, S.: Use of design patterns in analogy-based design. Adv. Eng. Inform. 18, 85–94 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pramod Khambete
    • 1
    Email author
  • Uday Athavankar
    • 1
  • Pankaj Doke
    • 2
  • Ratnendra Shinde
    • 3
  • Debjani Roy
    • 1
  • Sujit Devkar
    • 2
  • Sanjay Kimbahune
    • 2
  • Sujata Chaudhary
    • 1
  1. 1.Industrial Design CenterIndian Institute of Technology BombayMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.Tata Consultancy ServicesMumbaiIndia
  3. 3.Seth G. S. Medical College and KEM HospitalMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations