Advertisement

Comparative Study of On-Demand and Table-Driven Routing Protocols in MANET

  • G. Kumar Pallai
  • S. Meenakshi
  • A. Kumar Rath
  • B. Majhi
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 32)

Abstract

In this paper, we have studied a comparative analysis on three MANET routing protocols namely AODV, DSR and DSDV. The performances of protocols are evaluated with respect to packet delivery ratio, throughput, average end-to-end delay, routing overhead, normalized routing load, and packet drop and loss metrics. Experiments has been conducted with 80 numbers of nodes using random waypoint mobility model for constant bit rate traffic using NS-2.35 simulator as a function of varying speed. Simulation results conclude that the throughput performance of both the on-demand routing protocols is fairly comparable. However, DSR protocol outperforms in terms of routing overhead, normalized routing load and packet drop metrics than AODV. Overall, AODV protocol exhibits superior performance in terms of packet delivery ratio and packet loss.

Keywords

AODV CBR DSR DSDV Mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs) Routing protocols Routing table (RT) 

References

  1. 1.
    Chlamtac, I., Conti, M., Liu, J.: Mobile ad hoc networking: imperatives and challenges. Ad-Hoc Netw. J. 1, 13–64 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Royer, E.M., Toh, C.K.: A review of current routing protocols for ad-hoc mobile wireless networks. IEEE Pers. Commun. Mag. 6, 46–55 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Taneja, S., Kush, A., Makkar, A.: Experimental analysis of DSR, AODV using speed and pause time. Int. J. Innov. Manage. Technol. 1, 453–458 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tonk, G., Kashyap, I., Tyagi, S.S.: Performance comparison of ad-hoc network routing protocols using NS-2. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Exploring Eng. (IJITEE) 1 (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huang, R., Zhuang, Y., Cao, Q.: Simulation and analysis of protocols in ad hoc network. In: International Conference on Electronic Computer Technology, pp. 169–173 (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baraković, S., Kasapović, S., Baraković, J.: Comparison of MANET routing protocols in different traffic and mobility models. Telfor J. 2, 8–12 (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Malhotra, R., Sachdeva, B.: Multilingual evaluation of the DSR, DSDV and AODV routing protocols in mobile ad hoc networks. SIJ Trans. Comput. Netw. Commun. Eng. (CNCE) 1 (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Raju, J., Garcia-Luna-Aceves, J.J.: A comparison of on demand and table driven routing for ad hoc wireless networks. In: Proceedings of IEEE ICC (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Perkins, E., Royer, E.M.: Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, vol. 3, pp. 90–100 (1999)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Perkins, C.E., Royer, E.M., Das, S.R., Marina, M.K.: Performance comparison of two on demand routing protocols for ad hoc networks. IEEE Pers. Commun. Mag. 8, 16–29 (2001). (Special Issue on Mobile Ad Hoc Networks)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Johnson, D.B., Maltz, D.A.: Dynamic source routing in ad hoc wireless networks. In: Imielinski, T., Korth, H.F. (eds.) Mobile Computing, pp. 153–181. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Berlin (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Perkins, C.E., Begat, P.: Highly dynamic destination-sequenced distance-vector routing (DSDV) for mobile computers. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM‘94 Conference on Communications Architectures, Protocols, and Applications, pp. 234–244, London (1994)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Greis, M.: Tutorial for the UCB/LBNL/VINT Network Simulator “ns”. http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/tutorial/
  14. 14.
    Camp, T., Boleng, J., Davies, V.: A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research. Wireless Commun. Mobile Comput. (WCMC) 2, 483–502 (2002). (Special Issue on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking. Research, Trends and Applications)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Kumar Pallai
    • 1
  • S. Meenakshi
    • 2
  • A. Kumar Rath
    • 3
  • B. Majhi
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringNM Institute of Engineering and TechnologyBhubaneswarIndia
  2. 2.Department of Humanities and Social SciencesNational Institute of Technology, RourkelaRourkelaIndia
  3. 3.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringVeer Surendra Sai University of TechnologyBurlaIndia
  4. 4.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringNational Institute of Technology, RourkelaRourkelaIndia

Personalised recommendations