A Progressive Failure Study of E-glass/Epoxy Composite in Case of Low Velocity Impact

  • Harpreet Singh
  • Puneet Mahajan
  • K. K. Namala
Conference paper


To predict the behavior of composites in case of low velocity impact, there are various material models available in literature. Either the complex implementation or determination of large number of required material parameters is proving a common major limitation among all these. In the present study, low velocity Impact experiments are performed on E-glass/epoxy composite and numerically simulated using a continuum damage mechanics based material model. The damage observed as back face signature on the laminate, contact forces and displacement plots with respect to time are studied and compared with FE results to demonstrate the effectiveness of the model. The digital image correlation (DIC) technique is used for experimentation to obtain displacement on the surface of the plate.


Epoxy composite Low velocity impact Progressive failure study VUMAT subroutine 


  1. 1.
    Abrate Serge (1998) Impact on composite structures. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Caprino G et al (1999) Influence of material thickness on the response of carbonfabric/ epoxy panels to low velocity impact. Compos Sci Technol 59:2279–2286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mili F, Necib B (2001) Impact behavior of cross-ply laminated composite plates under low velocities. Compos Struct 51(3):237–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Belingardi G, Vadori R (2002) Low velocity impact tests of laminate glass-fiberepoxy matrix composite material plates. Int J Impact Eng 27:213–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aslan R, Karakuzu Z, Okutan B (2003) The response of laminated composite plates under low velocity impact loading. Compos Struct 59:119–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mitrevski T, Marshall IH, Thomson R (2006) The influence of impactor shape on the damage to composite laminates. Compos Struct 76:116–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schoeppner GA, Abrate S (2000) Delamination threshold loads for low-velocity impact on composite laminates. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 31:903–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ambur DR, Starnes JH, Prasad CB (1995) Low-speed impact damage-initiation characteristics of selected laminated composite plates. AIAA J 33(10):1919–1925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dumont JP et al. (1987) Damage mechanics for 3-D composites. Compos Struct 8(2):119–141Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Iannucci L, Ankersen J (2006) An energy based damage model for thin laminated composites. Compos Sci Technol 66(7-8):934–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Donadon MV et al (2008) A progressive failure model for composite laminates subjected to low velocity impact damage. Comput Struct 86(11–12):1232–1252Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Raimondo et al L (2012) A progressive failure model for mesh-size-independent FE analysis of composite laminates subject to low-velocity impact damage. Compos Sci Technol 72(5):624–632Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shi Y, Swait T, Soutis C (2012) Modelling damage evolution in composite laminates subjected to low velocity impact. Compos Struct 94(9):2902–2913Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Matzenmiller A, Lubliner J, Taylor RL (1995) A constitutive model for anisotropic damage in fiber-composites. Mech Mater 20(2):125–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Puck A, Schurmann H (1998) Failure analysis of FRP laminates by means of physically based phenomenological models. Compos Sci Technol 3538(96):1045–1067CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Harpreet Singh
    • 1
  • Puneet Mahajan
    • 1
  • K. K. Namala
    • 1
  1. 1.Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IITD)Hauz Khas, New DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations