Advertisement

Nonlinear Finite Element Bending Analysis of Composite Shell Panels

  • S. N. PatelEmail author
Conference paper

Abstract

This paper deals with the geometric nonlinear bending response of laminated composite shell panels subjected to transverse loading. The eight-noded degenerated shell element with five degrees of freedom per node is adopted in the present analysis to model the composite shell panels. The Green-Lagrange strain displacement relationship is adopted to formulate the matrices. The total Lagrangian approach is taken in the formulation. The arc-length method of solution is adopted in tracing the equilibrium path. The results by this method are compared with the available results and the conclusions are made.

Keywords

Degenerated shell element Nonlinear analysis Green-Lagrange nonlinearity Cylindrical panels Arc-length method Laminated composite 

References

  1. 1.
    Ahmad S, Irons BM, Zienkiewicz OC (1970) Analysis of thick and thin shell structures by curved finite elements. Int J Numer Meth Eng 3:419–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chang TY, Sawamiphakdi K (1981) Large deformation analysis of laminated shells by finite element method. Comput Struct 13(1–3):331–340CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Crisfield MA (1981) A fast incremental/iterative solution procedure that handles ‘snap-through’. Comput Struct 13(1–3):55–62CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fafard M, Massicotte (1993) Geometrical interpretation of the arc-length method. Comput Struct 46(4):603–615CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim K, Voyiadjis GZ (1999) Nonlinear finite element analysis of composite panels. Compos B 30:365–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kundu CK, Sinha PK (2007) Post buckling analysis of laminated composite shells. Compos Struct 78:316–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rao JS (1999) Dynamics of plates. Narosa Publishing House, New DelhizbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Riks E (1979) An incremental approach to the solution of snapping and buckling problems. Int J Solids Struct 15:529–551CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sabir AB, Lock AC (1972) The applications of finite elements to large deflection geometrically nonlinear behaviour of cylindrical shells. In: Brebbia CA, Tottenham H (eds) Variational methods in engineering: proceedings on an international conference held at the University of Southampto. Southampton University Press, Southampton, pp 7/54–7/65Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sabir AB, Djoudi MS (1995) Shallow shell finite element for the large deformation geometrically nonlinear analysis of shells and plates. Thin-Walled Struct 21:253–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sze KY, Liu XH, Lo SH (2004) Popular benchmark problems for geometric nonlinear analysis of shells. Finite Elem Anal Des 40:1551–1569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wood RD, Schrefler B (1978) Geometrically nonlinear analysis-a correlation of finite element methods. Int J Numer Meth Eng 12(4):635–642CrossRefMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zienkiewicz OC (1977) The finite element method. Tata Mc-Graw Hill Publishing Company Limited, New DelhizbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringBITS PilaniPilaniIndia

Personalised recommendations