Skip to main content

Ductility of Concrete Members Partially Prestressed with Unbonded and External Tendons

  • Conference paper
Advances in Structural Engineering
  • 4295 Accesses

Abstract

Partial prestressing is basically a prestressed concrete approach in which prestressed reinforcement or prestressed and non prestressed reinforcement is used such that tension and cracking in concrete is allowed under service loads. Although there were studies on ductility in partial prestressing available in literature, it is necessary to take up further studies on ductility by applying different types of experiment data for better understanding. Curvature ductility is chosen for the present study and the same is evaluated using the data published in literature. Curvature ductility μ is defined as the ratio of curvature at ultimate ϕu to that of yield ϕy. Totally the data of 45 specimens were used for the study. Shape of the specimens consists of rectangular section and T-beam section. There is a strong opinion among researchers and practicing engineers that compressive reinforcing steel would enormously improve the ductility of concrete members. In view of this, data of specimens with and without compressive reinforcement was also studied. Parametric studies by taking into account of different parameters on ductility namely, reinforcement index, yield curvature, deflection curvature, Mult/Myld and Partial Prestressing Ratio (PPR) in partially prestressed concrete members of unbonded post tensioning tendons have been carried out. There are many criteria reported in literature regarding curvature at yield. However, criteria namely: (i) yielding of reinforcing steel; (ii) 0.75 Mn, where Mn corresponds to 0.003 strain; and (iii) intersection point of two lines of moment-curvature curve have been studied. It is observed that Reinforcement index is the influencing parameter in evaluating ductility for partially prestressed concrete beams with unbonded and external tendons. Partial Prestressing Ratio (PPR) is not an influencing parameter for evaluating ductility. There is a proportional decrease in Mult/Myld and a proportional increase in the yield moment and ultimate moment according to the ascending order of reinforcement index. Curvature ductility is linearly proportional to the deflection ductility, if the reinforcement index is in ascending order. Curvature ductility is the better index for evaluating ductility of unbonded partially prestressed concrete members rather than displacement ductility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. ACI Committee 318 (2002) Building code requirements for reinforced concrete (ACI 318-02). American Concrete Institute, Detroit

    Google Scholar 

  2. Au FTK, Du JS (2004) Partially prestressed concrete. Prog Struct Eng Mater 6:127–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Au FTK, Su RKL, Tso K, Chan KHE (2008) Behaviour of partially prestressed beams with external tendons. Mag Concr Res 60(6):455–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Campbell TI, Chouinard KL (1991) Influence of non-prestressed reinforcement on the strength of unbonded partially prestressed concrete members. ACI Struct J 88(5):546–551

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chakrabarti PR, Whang TP, Brown W, Arsad KM, Amezeua E (1994) Unbonded post-tensioning tendons and partially prestressed beams. ACI Struct J 91(5):616–625

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cohn MZ, Bartlett M (1982) Nonlinear flexural response of partially prestressed concrete sections. J Struct Div ASCE 108(ST12):2747–2765

    Google Scholar 

  7. Du G, Tao X (1985) Ultimate stress of unbonded tendons in partially prestressed concrete beams. PCI J 30(6):72–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Harajli MH, Naaman AE (1984) Deformation and cracking of partially prestressed concrete beams under static and fatigue loading. Report No UNMEE 84R1, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigon, pp 1–178

    Google Scholar 

  9. Naaman AE (1985) Partially prestressed concrete: review and recommendations. PCI J 30(5):31–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Park R (1988) Ductility evaluation from laboratory and analytical testing. In: Proceedings of the 9th world conference on earthquake engineering, vol VIII, Tokyo-Kyoto, pp 605–616

    Google Scholar 

  11. Park R, Folconer TJ (1983) Ductility of prestressed concrete piles subjected to simulated seismic loading. PCI J 28:112–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Thompson KJ, Park R (1980) Ductility of prestressed and partially prestressed concrete beam sections. PCI J 25(2):46–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful to the Director, CSIR-SERC Chennai for encouraging the research pertaining to this paper and for permitting the paper for publication. The author sincerely thanks Dr. K. Ramanjaneyulu, Head (ACTEL), for his suggestions in improving the quality of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Manisekar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer India

About this paper

Cite this paper

Manisekar, R. (2015). Ductility of Concrete Members Partially Prestressed with Unbonded and External Tendons. In: Matsagar, V. (eds) Advances in Structural Engineering. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2187-6_170

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2187-6_170

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi

  • Print ISBN: 978-81-322-2186-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-81-322-2187-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics